Pauci ex tanto numero: reduce redundancy in multi-model ensembles

We explicitly address the fundamental issue of member diversity in multi-model ensembles. To date, no attempts in this direction have been documented within the air quality (AQ) community despite the extensive use of ensembles in this field. <i>Common biases</i> and <i>redundancy&l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. Solazzo, A. Riccio, I. Kioutsioukis, S. Galmarini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2013-08-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/13/8315/2013/acp-13-8315-2013.pdf
_version_ 1818033845072560128
author E. Solazzo
A. Riccio
I. Kioutsioukis
S. Galmarini
author_facet E. Solazzo
A. Riccio
I. Kioutsioukis
S. Galmarini
author_sort E. Solazzo
collection DOAJ
description We explicitly address the fundamental issue of member diversity in multi-model ensembles. To date, no attempts in this direction have been documented within the air quality (AQ) community despite the extensive use of ensembles in this field. <i>Common biases</i> and <i>redundancy</i> are the two issues directly deriving from lack of independence, undermining the significance of a multi-model ensemble, and are the subject of this study. Shared, dependant biases among models do not cancel out but will instead determine a biased ensemble. Redundancy derives from having too large a portion of common variance among the members of the ensemble, producing overconfidence in the predictions and underestimation of the uncertainty. The two issues of common biases and redundancy are analysed in detail using the AQMEII ensemble of AQ model results for four air pollutants in two European regions. We show that models share large portions of bias and variance, extending well beyond those induced by common inputs. We make use of several techniques to further show that subsets of models can explain the same amount of variance as the full ensemble with the advantage of being poorly correlated. Selecting the members for generating skilful, non-redundant ensembles from such subsets proved, however, non-trivial. We propose and discuss various methods of member selection and rate the ensemble performance they produce. In most cases, the full ensemble is outscored by the reduced ones. We conclude that, although independence of outputs may not always guarantee enhancement of scores (but this depends upon the skill being investigated), we discourage selecting the members of the ensemble simply on the basis of scores; that is, independence and skills need to be considered disjointly.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T06:29:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d9cc99075cd244148f060956b331dd19
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T06:29:44Z
publishDate 2013-08-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-d9cc99075cd244148f060956b331dd192022-12-22T01:59:08ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242013-08-0113168315833310.5194/acp-13-8315-2013Pauci ex tanto numero: reduce redundancy in multi-model ensemblesE. SolazzoA. RiccioI. KioutsioukisS. GalmariniWe explicitly address the fundamental issue of member diversity in multi-model ensembles. To date, no attempts in this direction have been documented within the air quality (AQ) community despite the extensive use of ensembles in this field. <i>Common biases</i> and <i>redundancy</i> are the two issues directly deriving from lack of independence, undermining the significance of a multi-model ensemble, and are the subject of this study. Shared, dependant biases among models do not cancel out but will instead determine a biased ensemble. Redundancy derives from having too large a portion of common variance among the members of the ensemble, producing overconfidence in the predictions and underestimation of the uncertainty. The two issues of common biases and redundancy are analysed in detail using the AQMEII ensemble of AQ model results for four air pollutants in two European regions. We show that models share large portions of bias and variance, extending well beyond those induced by common inputs. We make use of several techniques to further show that subsets of models can explain the same amount of variance as the full ensemble with the advantage of being poorly correlated. Selecting the members for generating skilful, non-redundant ensembles from such subsets proved, however, non-trivial. We propose and discuss various methods of member selection and rate the ensemble performance they produce. In most cases, the full ensemble is outscored by the reduced ones. We conclude that, although independence of outputs may not always guarantee enhancement of scores (but this depends upon the skill being investigated), we discourage selecting the members of the ensemble simply on the basis of scores; that is, independence and skills need to be considered disjointly.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/13/8315/2013/acp-13-8315-2013.pdf
spellingShingle E. Solazzo
A. Riccio
I. Kioutsioukis
S. Galmarini
Pauci ex tanto numero: reduce redundancy in multi-model ensembles
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Pauci ex tanto numero: reduce redundancy in multi-model ensembles
title_full Pauci ex tanto numero: reduce redundancy in multi-model ensembles
title_fullStr Pauci ex tanto numero: reduce redundancy in multi-model ensembles
title_full_unstemmed Pauci ex tanto numero: reduce redundancy in multi-model ensembles
title_short Pauci ex tanto numero: reduce redundancy in multi-model ensembles
title_sort pauci ex tanto numero reduce redundancy in multi model ensembles
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/13/8315/2013/acp-13-8315-2013.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT esolazzo pauciextantonumeroreduceredundancyinmultimodelensembles
AT ariccio pauciextantonumeroreduceredundancyinmultimodelensembles
AT ikioutsioukis pauciextantonumeroreduceredundancyinmultimodelensembles
AT sgalmarini pauciextantonumeroreduceredundancyinmultimodelensembles