A comparison of doctoral training in biomedicine and medicine for some UK and Scandinavian graduate programmes: learning from each other
Although the historical bases for graduate training in the United Kingdom (UK) and Scandinavia both stem from the original concept developed by von Humboldt, and both award a ‘PhD degree', their paths have diverged. There are thus significant differences in the manner in which graduate training...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2019-05-01
|
| Series: | FEBS Open Bio |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.12629 |
| _version_ | 1811221029472698368 |
|---|---|
| author | Anwen Williams Meriel G. Jones Roland Jonsson Robert A. Harris Michael J. Mulvany |
| author_facet | Anwen Williams Meriel G. Jones Roland Jonsson Robert A. Harris Michael J. Mulvany |
| author_sort | Anwen Williams |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Although the historical bases for graduate training in the United Kingdom (UK) and Scandinavia both stem from the original concept developed by von Humboldt, and both award a ‘PhD degree', their paths have diverged. There are thus significant differences in the manner in which graduate training is organised. To analyse these differences, two UK graduate programmes (School of Medicine, Cardiff University; Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool) and two Scandinavian graduate schools (Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm) completed a Self‐evaluation questionnaire developed by Organisation of PhD Education in Biomedicine and Health Sciences in the European System (ORPHEUS)). Analysis of the completed questionnaires shows differences concerning requirements for admission, the training content of PhD programmes, the format of the PhD thesis, how the thesis is assessed and the financial model. All programmes recognise that PhD training should prepare for employment both inside and outside of academia, with emphasis on transferable skills training. However, the analysis reveals some fundamental differences in the direction of graduate programmes in the UK and Scandinavia. In the UK, graduate programmes are directed primarily towards teaching PhD students to do research, with considerable focus on practical techniques. In Scandinavia, the focus is on managing projects and publishing papers. To some extent, the differences lead to a lack of full recognition of each other's theses as a basis for doing a postdoc. This paper describes the basis for these differences and compares the two approaches and points to areas in which there is, or might be, convergence. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T07:52:42Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d9ce8597a1ac4cf3a688a0bd2f59f707 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2211-5463 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T07:52:42Z |
| publishDate | 2019-05-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | FEBS Open Bio |
| spelling | doaj.art-d9ce8597a1ac4cf3a688a0bd2f59f7072022-12-22T03:41:34ZengWileyFEBS Open Bio2211-54632019-05-019583083910.1002/2211-5463.12629A comparison of doctoral training in biomedicine and medicine for some UK and Scandinavian graduate programmes: learning from each otherAnwen Williams0Meriel G. Jones1Roland Jonsson2Robert A. Harris3Michael J. Mulvany4School of Medicine Cardiff University UKInstitute of Integrative Biology University of Liverpool UKFaculty of Medicine University of Bergen NorwayDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Sjukhuset Karolinska Institutet Stockholm SwedenDepartment of Biomedicine Aarhus University Aarhus DenmarkAlthough the historical bases for graduate training in the United Kingdom (UK) and Scandinavia both stem from the original concept developed by von Humboldt, and both award a ‘PhD degree', their paths have diverged. There are thus significant differences in the manner in which graduate training is organised. To analyse these differences, two UK graduate programmes (School of Medicine, Cardiff University; Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool) and two Scandinavian graduate schools (Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm) completed a Self‐evaluation questionnaire developed by Organisation of PhD Education in Biomedicine and Health Sciences in the European System (ORPHEUS)). Analysis of the completed questionnaires shows differences concerning requirements for admission, the training content of PhD programmes, the format of the PhD thesis, how the thesis is assessed and the financial model. All programmes recognise that PhD training should prepare for employment both inside and outside of academia, with emphasis on transferable skills training. However, the analysis reveals some fundamental differences in the direction of graduate programmes in the UK and Scandinavia. In the UK, graduate programmes are directed primarily towards teaching PhD students to do research, with considerable focus on practical techniques. In Scandinavia, the focus is on managing projects and publishing papers. To some extent, the differences lead to a lack of full recognition of each other's theses as a basis for doing a postdoc. This paper describes the basis for these differences and compares the two approaches and points to areas in which there is, or might be, convergence.https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.12629PhD admissionPhD outcomesPhD supervisionPhD thesisPhD training |
| spellingShingle | Anwen Williams Meriel G. Jones Roland Jonsson Robert A. Harris Michael J. Mulvany A comparison of doctoral training in biomedicine and medicine for some UK and Scandinavian graduate programmes: learning from each other FEBS Open Bio PhD admission PhD outcomes PhD supervision PhD thesis PhD training |
| title | A comparison of doctoral training in biomedicine and medicine for some UK and Scandinavian graduate programmes: learning from each other |
| title_full | A comparison of doctoral training in biomedicine and medicine for some UK and Scandinavian graduate programmes: learning from each other |
| title_fullStr | A comparison of doctoral training in biomedicine and medicine for some UK and Scandinavian graduate programmes: learning from each other |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of doctoral training in biomedicine and medicine for some UK and Scandinavian graduate programmes: learning from each other |
| title_short | A comparison of doctoral training in biomedicine and medicine for some UK and Scandinavian graduate programmes: learning from each other |
| title_sort | comparison of doctoral training in biomedicine and medicine for some uk and scandinavian graduate programmes learning from each other |
| topic | PhD admission PhD outcomes PhD supervision PhD thesis PhD training |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.12629 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT anwenwilliams acomparisonofdoctoraltraininginbiomedicineandmedicineforsomeukandscandinaviangraduateprogrammeslearningfromeachother AT merielgjones acomparisonofdoctoraltraininginbiomedicineandmedicineforsomeukandscandinaviangraduateprogrammeslearningfromeachother AT rolandjonsson acomparisonofdoctoraltraininginbiomedicineandmedicineforsomeukandscandinaviangraduateprogrammeslearningfromeachother AT robertaharris acomparisonofdoctoraltraininginbiomedicineandmedicineforsomeukandscandinaviangraduateprogrammeslearningfromeachother AT michaeljmulvany acomparisonofdoctoraltraininginbiomedicineandmedicineforsomeukandscandinaviangraduateprogrammeslearningfromeachother AT anwenwilliams comparisonofdoctoraltraininginbiomedicineandmedicineforsomeukandscandinaviangraduateprogrammeslearningfromeachother AT merielgjones comparisonofdoctoraltraininginbiomedicineandmedicineforsomeukandscandinaviangraduateprogrammeslearningfromeachother AT rolandjonsson comparisonofdoctoraltraininginbiomedicineandmedicineforsomeukandscandinaviangraduateprogrammeslearningfromeachother AT robertaharris comparisonofdoctoraltraininginbiomedicineandmedicineforsomeukandscandinaviangraduateprogrammeslearningfromeachother AT michaeljmulvany comparisonofdoctoraltraininginbiomedicineandmedicineforsomeukandscandinaviangraduateprogrammeslearningfromeachother |