Sharing Clinical Notes and Electronic Health Records With People Affected by Mental Health Conditions: Scoping Review
BackgroundElectronic health records (EHRs) are increasingly implemented internationally, whereas digital sharing of EHRs with service users (SUs) is a relatively new practice. Studies of patient-accessible EHRs (PAEHRs)—often referred to as open notes—have revealed promising...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2021-12-01
|
| Series: | JMIR Mental Health |
| Online Access: | https://mental.jmir.org/2021/12/e34170 |
| _version_ | 1797735499129946112 |
|---|---|
| author | Julian Schwarz Annika Bärkås Charlotte Blease Lorna Collins Maria Hägglund Sarah Markham Stefan Hochwarter |
| author_facet | Julian Schwarz Annika Bärkås Charlotte Blease Lorna Collins Maria Hägglund Sarah Markham Stefan Hochwarter |
| author_sort | Julian Schwarz |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundElectronic health records (EHRs) are increasingly implemented internationally, whereas digital sharing of EHRs with service users (SUs) is a relatively new practice. Studies of patient-accessible EHRs (PAEHRs)—often referred to as open notes—have revealed promising results within general medicine settings. However, studies carried out in mental health care (MHC) settings highlight several ethical and practical challenges that require further exploration.
ObjectiveThis scoping review aims to map available evidence on PAEHRs in MHC. We seek to relate findings with research from other health contexts, to compare different stakeholders’ perspectives, expectations, actual experiences with PAEHRs, and identify potential research gaps.
MethodsA systematic scoping review was performed using 6 electronic databases. Studies that focused on the digital sharing of clinical notes or EHRs with people affected by mental health conditions up to September 2021 were included. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess the quality of the studies. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) Extension for Scoping Reviews guided narrative synthesis and reporting of findings.
ResultsOf the 1034 papers screened, 31 were included in this review. The studies used mostly qualitative methods or surveys and were predominantly published after 2018 in the United States. PAEHRs were examined in outpatient (n=29) and inpatient settings (n=11), and a third of all research was conducted in Veterans Affairs Mental Health. Narrative synthesis allowed the integration of findings according to the different stakeholders. First, SUs reported mainly positive experiences with PAEHRs, such as increased trust in their clinician, health literacy, and empowerment. Negative experiences were related to inaccurate notes, disrespectful language use, or uncovering of undiscussed diagnoses. Second, for health care professionals, concerns outweigh the benefits of sharing EHRs, including an increased clinical burden owing to more documentation efforts and possible harm triggered by reading the notes. Third, care partners gained a better understanding of their family members’ mental problems and were able to better support them when they had access to their EHR. Finally, policy stakeholders and experts addressed ethical challenges and recommended the development of guidelines and trainings to better prepare both clinicians and SUs on how to write and read notes.
ConclusionsPAEHRs in MHC may strengthen user involvement, patients’ autonomy, and shift medical treatment to a coproduced process. Acceptance issues among health care professionals align with the findings from general health settings. However, the corpus of evidence on digital sharing of EHRs with people affected by mental health conditions is limited. Above all, further research is needed to examine the clinical effectiveness, efficiency, and implementation of this sociotechnical intervention. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T12:59:56Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d9d6e08c468e40a9aa1a9e13d6e5a04f |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2368-7959 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T12:59:56Z |
| publishDate | 2021-12-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JMIR Mental Health |
| spelling | doaj.art-d9d6e08c468e40a9aa1a9e13d6e5a04f2023-08-28T20:00:58ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Mental Health2368-79592021-12-01812e3417010.2196/34170Sharing Clinical Notes and Electronic Health Records With People Affected by Mental Health Conditions: Scoping ReviewJulian Schwarzhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7306-7909Annika Bärkåshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1209-7714Charlotte Bleasehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0205-1165Lorna Collinshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0901-4033Maria Hägglundhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6839-3651Sarah Markhamhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8755-5935Stefan Hochwarterhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2652-135X BackgroundElectronic health records (EHRs) are increasingly implemented internationally, whereas digital sharing of EHRs with service users (SUs) is a relatively new practice. Studies of patient-accessible EHRs (PAEHRs)—often referred to as open notes—have revealed promising results within general medicine settings. However, studies carried out in mental health care (MHC) settings highlight several ethical and practical challenges that require further exploration. ObjectiveThis scoping review aims to map available evidence on PAEHRs in MHC. We seek to relate findings with research from other health contexts, to compare different stakeholders’ perspectives, expectations, actual experiences with PAEHRs, and identify potential research gaps. MethodsA systematic scoping review was performed using 6 electronic databases. Studies that focused on the digital sharing of clinical notes or EHRs with people affected by mental health conditions up to September 2021 were included. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess the quality of the studies. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) Extension for Scoping Reviews guided narrative synthesis and reporting of findings. ResultsOf the 1034 papers screened, 31 were included in this review. The studies used mostly qualitative methods or surveys and were predominantly published after 2018 in the United States. PAEHRs were examined in outpatient (n=29) and inpatient settings (n=11), and a third of all research was conducted in Veterans Affairs Mental Health. Narrative synthesis allowed the integration of findings according to the different stakeholders. First, SUs reported mainly positive experiences with PAEHRs, such as increased trust in their clinician, health literacy, and empowerment. Negative experiences were related to inaccurate notes, disrespectful language use, or uncovering of undiscussed diagnoses. Second, for health care professionals, concerns outweigh the benefits of sharing EHRs, including an increased clinical burden owing to more documentation efforts and possible harm triggered by reading the notes. Third, care partners gained a better understanding of their family members’ mental problems and were able to better support them when they had access to their EHR. Finally, policy stakeholders and experts addressed ethical challenges and recommended the development of guidelines and trainings to better prepare both clinicians and SUs on how to write and read notes. ConclusionsPAEHRs in MHC may strengthen user involvement, patients’ autonomy, and shift medical treatment to a coproduced process. Acceptance issues among health care professionals align with the findings from general health settings. However, the corpus of evidence on digital sharing of EHRs with people affected by mental health conditions is limited. Above all, further research is needed to examine the clinical effectiveness, efficiency, and implementation of this sociotechnical intervention.https://mental.jmir.org/2021/12/e34170 |
| spellingShingle | Julian Schwarz Annika Bärkås Charlotte Blease Lorna Collins Maria Hägglund Sarah Markham Stefan Hochwarter Sharing Clinical Notes and Electronic Health Records With People Affected by Mental Health Conditions: Scoping Review JMIR Mental Health |
| title | Sharing Clinical Notes and Electronic Health Records With People Affected by Mental Health Conditions: Scoping Review |
| title_full | Sharing Clinical Notes and Electronic Health Records With People Affected by Mental Health Conditions: Scoping Review |
| title_fullStr | Sharing Clinical Notes and Electronic Health Records With People Affected by Mental Health Conditions: Scoping Review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Sharing Clinical Notes and Electronic Health Records With People Affected by Mental Health Conditions: Scoping Review |
| title_short | Sharing Clinical Notes and Electronic Health Records With People Affected by Mental Health Conditions: Scoping Review |
| title_sort | sharing clinical notes and electronic health records with people affected by mental health conditions scoping review |
| url | https://mental.jmir.org/2021/12/e34170 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT julianschwarz sharingclinicalnotesandelectronichealthrecordswithpeopleaffectedbymentalhealthconditionsscopingreview AT annikabarkas sharingclinicalnotesandelectronichealthrecordswithpeopleaffectedbymentalhealthconditionsscopingreview AT charlotteblease sharingclinicalnotesandelectronichealthrecordswithpeopleaffectedbymentalhealthconditionsscopingreview AT lornacollins sharingclinicalnotesandelectronichealthrecordswithpeopleaffectedbymentalhealthconditionsscopingreview AT mariahagglund sharingclinicalnotesandelectronichealthrecordswithpeopleaffectedbymentalhealthconditionsscopingreview AT sarahmarkham sharingclinicalnotesandelectronichealthrecordswithpeopleaffectedbymentalhealthconditionsscopingreview AT stefanhochwarter sharingclinicalnotesandelectronichealthrecordswithpeopleaffectedbymentalhealthconditionsscopingreview |