Engagement of intrinsic disordered proteins in protein–protein interaction

Proteins from the intrinsically disordered group (IDP) focus the attention of many researchers engaged in protein structure analysis. The main criteria used in their identification are lack of secondary structure and significant structural variability. This variability takes forms that cannot be ide...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Irena Roterman, Katarzyna Stapor, Leszek Konieczny
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2023.1230922/full
_version_ 1797768793792970752
author Irena Roterman
Katarzyna Stapor
Leszek Konieczny
author_facet Irena Roterman
Katarzyna Stapor
Leszek Konieczny
author_sort Irena Roterman
collection DOAJ
description Proteins from the intrinsically disordered group (IDP) focus the attention of many researchers engaged in protein structure analysis. The main criteria used in their identification are lack of secondary structure and significant structural variability. This variability takes forms that cannot be identified in the X-ray technique. In the present study, different criteria were used to assess the status of IDP proteins and their fragments recognized as intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). The status of the hydrophobic core in proteins identified as IDPs and in their complexes was assessed. The status of IDRs as components of the ordering structure resulting from the construction of the hydrophobic core was also assessed. The hydrophobic core is understood as a structure encompassing the entire molecule in the form of a centrally located high concentration of hydrophobicity and a shell with a gradually decreasing level of hydrophobicity until it reaches a level close to zero on the protein surface. It is a model assuming that the protein folding process follows a micellization pattern aiming at exposing polar residues on the surface, with the simultaneous isolation of hydrophobic amino acids from the polar aquatic environment. The use of the model of hydrophobicity distribution in proteins in the form of the 3D Gaussian distribution described on the protein particle introduces the possibility of assessing the degree of similarity to the assumed micelle-like distribution and also enables the identification of deviations and mismatch between the actual distribution and the idealized distribution. The FOD (fuzzy oil drop) model and its modified FOD-M version allow for the quantitative assessment of these differences and the assessment of the relationship of these areas to the protein function. In the present work, the sections of IDRs in protein complexes classified as IDPs are analyzed. The classification “disordered” in the structural sense (lack of secondary structure or high flexibility) does not always entail a mismatch with the structure of the hydrophobic core. Particularly, the interface area, often consisting of IDRs, in many analyzed complexes shows the compliance of the hydrophobicity distribution with the idealized distribution, which proves that matching to the structure of the hydrophobic core does not require secondary structure ordering.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T20:58:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d9e9f4798e364824b370d99f58874c1d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-889X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T20:58:29Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
spelling doaj.art-d9e9f4798e364824b370d99f58874c1d2023-07-31T11:31:28ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences2296-889X2023-07-011010.3389/fmolb.2023.12309221230922Engagement of intrinsic disordered proteins in protein–protein interactionIrena Roterman0Katarzyna Stapor1Leszek Konieczny2Department of Bioinformatics and Telemedicine, Jagiellonian University—Medical College, Kraków, PolandDepartment of Applied Informatics, Faculty of Automatic, Electronics and Computer Science, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, PolandChair of Medical Biochemistry, Medical College, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, PolandProteins from the intrinsically disordered group (IDP) focus the attention of many researchers engaged in protein structure analysis. The main criteria used in their identification are lack of secondary structure and significant structural variability. This variability takes forms that cannot be identified in the X-ray technique. In the present study, different criteria were used to assess the status of IDP proteins and their fragments recognized as intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). The status of the hydrophobic core in proteins identified as IDPs and in their complexes was assessed. The status of IDRs as components of the ordering structure resulting from the construction of the hydrophobic core was also assessed. The hydrophobic core is understood as a structure encompassing the entire molecule in the form of a centrally located high concentration of hydrophobicity and a shell with a gradually decreasing level of hydrophobicity until it reaches a level close to zero on the protein surface. It is a model assuming that the protein folding process follows a micellization pattern aiming at exposing polar residues on the surface, with the simultaneous isolation of hydrophobic amino acids from the polar aquatic environment. The use of the model of hydrophobicity distribution in proteins in the form of the 3D Gaussian distribution described on the protein particle introduces the possibility of assessing the degree of similarity to the assumed micelle-like distribution and also enables the identification of deviations and mismatch between the actual distribution and the idealized distribution. The FOD (fuzzy oil drop) model and its modified FOD-M version allow for the quantitative assessment of these differences and the assessment of the relationship of these areas to the protein function. In the present work, the sections of IDRs in protein complexes classified as IDPs are analyzed. The classification “disordered” in the structural sense (lack of secondary structure or high flexibility) does not always entail a mismatch with the structure of the hydrophobic core. Particularly, the interface area, often consisting of IDRs, in many analyzed complexes shows the compliance of the hydrophobicity distribution with the idealized distribution, which proves that matching to the structure of the hydrophobic core does not require secondary structure ordering.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2023.1230922/fullintrinsically disordered proteinsdisporthydrophobicityprotein complexfunction-related structural changesorder-to-disorder
spellingShingle Irena Roterman
Katarzyna Stapor
Leszek Konieczny
Engagement of intrinsic disordered proteins in protein–protein interaction
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
intrinsically disordered proteins
disport
hydrophobicity
protein complex
function-related structural changes
order-to-disorder
title Engagement of intrinsic disordered proteins in protein–protein interaction
title_full Engagement of intrinsic disordered proteins in protein–protein interaction
title_fullStr Engagement of intrinsic disordered proteins in protein–protein interaction
title_full_unstemmed Engagement of intrinsic disordered proteins in protein–protein interaction
title_short Engagement of intrinsic disordered proteins in protein–protein interaction
title_sort engagement of intrinsic disordered proteins in protein protein interaction
topic intrinsically disordered proteins
disport
hydrophobicity
protein complex
function-related structural changes
order-to-disorder
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2023.1230922/full
work_keys_str_mv AT irenaroterman engagementofintrinsicdisorderedproteinsinproteinproteininteraction
AT katarzynastapor engagementofintrinsicdisorderedproteinsinproteinproteininteraction
AT leszekkonieczny engagementofintrinsicdisorderedproteinsinproteinproteininteraction