Modification of the Peck Formula for a Double-Track Shield Tunnel under Expressway Subgrade

In practice, asymmetric formation disturbance occurs due to the sequence of excavation though parallel double-track tunnel is a typical symmetrical engineering. Based on a shield tunneling project of a section of the Suzhou Rail Transit under the subgrade of the Shanghai–Nanjing Expressway, a finite...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuxiang Li, Juncen Lin, Songhong Yan, Jiaxuan Du
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-09-01
Series:Symmetry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/9/1904
_version_ 1797481929047539712
author Yuxiang Li
Juncen Lin
Songhong Yan
Jiaxuan Du
author_facet Yuxiang Li
Juncen Lin
Songhong Yan
Jiaxuan Du
author_sort Yuxiang Li
collection DOAJ
description In practice, asymmetric formation disturbance occurs due to the sequence of excavation though parallel double-track tunnel is a typical symmetrical engineering. Based on a shield tunneling project of a section of the Suzhou Rail Transit under the subgrade of the Shanghai–Nanjing Expressway, a finite element model was established to obtain a numerical solution that was validated by the measured data to guarantee reliability. According to the construction characteristics of the shield method, two correction coefficients—namely the soil loss rate correction coefficient <i>α</i> and the settlement trough width correction coefficient <i>β</i>—were introduced. A modified Peck formula suitable for the preceding tunnel and the subsequent tunnel was proposed. The applicability of the modified Peck formula was verified by another similar project. The results showed that the numerical solution can better reflect the actual settlement of the highway subgrade under shield tunneling. The results calculated by the classic Peck formula had a large error in comparison with the measured data. The modified empirical formula could more accurately predict the settlement of the expressway subgrade caused by the shield method when <i>α</i><sub>1</sub> = 0.38 and <i>β</i><sub>1</sub> = 2.08 for the preceding tunnel and <i>α</i><sub>2</sub> = 0.29 and <i>β</i><sub>2</sub> = 1.99 for the subsequent tunnel.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T22:22:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d9eb5ae18ad146eab014fb16f1bf6e9e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-8994
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T22:22:36Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Symmetry
spelling doaj.art-d9eb5ae18ad146eab014fb16f1bf6e9e2023-11-23T19:12:54ZengMDPI AGSymmetry2073-89942022-09-01149190410.3390/sym14091904Modification of the Peck Formula for a Double-Track Shield Tunnel under Expressway SubgradeYuxiang Li0Juncen Lin1Songhong Yan2Jiaxuan Du3School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, ChinaIn practice, asymmetric formation disturbance occurs due to the sequence of excavation though parallel double-track tunnel is a typical symmetrical engineering. Based on a shield tunneling project of a section of the Suzhou Rail Transit under the subgrade of the Shanghai–Nanjing Expressway, a finite element model was established to obtain a numerical solution that was validated by the measured data to guarantee reliability. According to the construction characteristics of the shield method, two correction coefficients—namely the soil loss rate correction coefficient <i>α</i> and the settlement trough width correction coefficient <i>β</i>—were introduced. A modified Peck formula suitable for the preceding tunnel and the subsequent tunnel was proposed. The applicability of the modified Peck formula was verified by another similar project. The results showed that the numerical solution can better reflect the actual settlement of the highway subgrade under shield tunneling. The results calculated by the classic Peck formula had a large error in comparison with the measured data. The modified empirical formula could more accurately predict the settlement of the expressway subgrade caused by the shield method when <i>α</i><sub>1</sub> = 0.38 and <i>β</i><sub>1</sub> = 2.08 for the preceding tunnel and <i>α</i><sub>2</sub> = 0.29 and <i>β</i><sub>2</sub> = 1.99 for the subsequent tunnel.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/9/1904shield tunnelroad subgradeformation deformationsettlement predictionPeck formula
spellingShingle Yuxiang Li
Juncen Lin
Songhong Yan
Jiaxuan Du
Modification of the Peck Formula for a Double-Track Shield Tunnel under Expressway Subgrade
Symmetry
shield tunnel
road subgrade
formation deformation
settlement prediction
Peck formula
title Modification of the Peck Formula for a Double-Track Shield Tunnel under Expressway Subgrade
title_full Modification of the Peck Formula for a Double-Track Shield Tunnel under Expressway Subgrade
title_fullStr Modification of the Peck Formula for a Double-Track Shield Tunnel under Expressway Subgrade
title_full_unstemmed Modification of the Peck Formula for a Double-Track Shield Tunnel under Expressway Subgrade
title_short Modification of the Peck Formula for a Double-Track Shield Tunnel under Expressway Subgrade
title_sort modification of the peck formula for a double track shield tunnel under expressway subgrade
topic shield tunnel
road subgrade
formation deformation
settlement prediction
Peck formula
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/9/1904
work_keys_str_mv AT yuxiangli modificationofthepeckformulaforadoubletrackshieldtunnelunderexpresswaysubgrade
AT juncenlin modificationofthepeckformulaforadoubletrackshieldtunnelunderexpresswaysubgrade
AT songhongyan modificationofthepeckformulaforadoubletrackshieldtunnelunderexpresswaysubgrade
AT jiaxuandu modificationofthepeckformulaforadoubletrackshieldtunnelunderexpresswaysubgrade