Modification of the Peck Formula for a Double-Track Shield Tunnel under Expressway Subgrade
In practice, asymmetric formation disturbance occurs due to the sequence of excavation though parallel double-track tunnel is a typical symmetrical engineering. Based on a shield tunneling project of a section of the Suzhou Rail Transit under the subgrade of the Shanghai–Nanjing Expressway, a finite...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-09-01
|
Series: | Symmetry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/9/1904 |
_version_ | 1797481929047539712 |
---|---|
author | Yuxiang Li Juncen Lin Songhong Yan Jiaxuan Du |
author_facet | Yuxiang Li Juncen Lin Songhong Yan Jiaxuan Du |
author_sort | Yuxiang Li |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In practice, asymmetric formation disturbance occurs due to the sequence of excavation though parallel double-track tunnel is a typical symmetrical engineering. Based on a shield tunneling project of a section of the Suzhou Rail Transit under the subgrade of the Shanghai–Nanjing Expressway, a finite element model was established to obtain a numerical solution that was validated by the measured data to guarantee reliability. According to the construction characteristics of the shield method, two correction coefficients—namely the soil loss rate correction coefficient <i>α</i> and the settlement trough width correction coefficient <i>β</i>—were introduced. A modified Peck formula suitable for the preceding tunnel and the subsequent tunnel was proposed. The applicability of the modified Peck formula was verified by another similar project. The results showed that the numerical solution can better reflect the actual settlement of the highway subgrade under shield tunneling. The results calculated by the classic Peck formula had a large error in comparison with the measured data. The modified empirical formula could more accurately predict the settlement of the expressway subgrade caused by the shield method when <i>α</i><sub>1</sub> = 0.38 and <i>β</i><sub>1</sub> = 2.08 for the preceding tunnel and <i>α</i><sub>2</sub> = 0.29 and <i>β</i><sub>2</sub> = 1.99 for the subsequent tunnel. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T22:22:36Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d9eb5ae18ad146eab014fb16f1bf6e9e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2073-8994 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T22:22:36Z |
publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Symmetry |
spelling | doaj.art-d9eb5ae18ad146eab014fb16f1bf6e9e2023-11-23T19:12:54ZengMDPI AGSymmetry2073-89942022-09-01149190410.3390/sym14091904Modification of the Peck Formula for a Double-Track Shield Tunnel under Expressway SubgradeYuxiang Li0Juncen Lin1Songhong Yan2Jiaxuan Du3School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, ChinaIn practice, asymmetric formation disturbance occurs due to the sequence of excavation though parallel double-track tunnel is a typical symmetrical engineering. Based on a shield tunneling project of a section of the Suzhou Rail Transit under the subgrade of the Shanghai–Nanjing Expressway, a finite element model was established to obtain a numerical solution that was validated by the measured data to guarantee reliability. According to the construction characteristics of the shield method, two correction coefficients—namely the soil loss rate correction coefficient <i>α</i> and the settlement trough width correction coefficient <i>β</i>—were introduced. A modified Peck formula suitable for the preceding tunnel and the subsequent tunnel was proposed. The applicability of the modified Peck formula was verified by another similar project. The results showed that the numerical solution can better reflect the actual settlement of the highway subgrade under shield tunneling. The results calculated by the classic Peck formula had a large error in comparison with the measured data. The modified empirical formula could more accurately predict the settlement of the expressway subgrade caused by the shield method when <i>α</i><sub>1</sub> = 0.38 and <i>β</i><sub>1</sub> = 2.08 for the preceding tunnel and <i>α</i><sub>2</sub> = 0.29 and <i>β</i><sub>2</sub> = 1.99 for the subsequent tunnel.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/9/1904shield tunnelroad subgradeformation deformationsettlement predictionPeck formula |
spellingShingle | Yuxiang Li Juncen Lin Songhong Yan Jiaxuan Du Modification of the Peck Formula for a Double-Track Shield Tunnel under Expressway Subgrade Symmetry shield tunnel road subgrade formation deformation settlement prediction Peck formula |
title | Modification of the Peck Formula for a Double-Track Shield Tunnel under Expressway Subgrade |
title_full | Modification of the Peck Formula for a Double-Track Shield Tunnel under Expressway Subgrade |
title_fullStr | Modification of the Peck Formula for a Double-Track Shield Tunnel under Expressway Subgrade |
title_full_unstemmed | Modification of the Peck Formula for a Double-Track Shield Tunnel under Expressway Subgrade |
title_short | Modification of the Peck Formula for a Double-Track Shield Tunnel under Expressway Subgrade |
title_sort | modification of the peck formula for a double track shield tunnel under expressway subgrade |
topic | shield tunnel road subgrade formation deformation settlement prediction Peck formula |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/9/1904 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuxiangli modificationofthepeckformulaforadoubletrackshieldtunnelunderexpresswaysubgrade AT juncenlin modificationofthepeckformulaforadoubletrackshieldtunnelunderexpresswaysubgrade AT songhongyan modificationofthepeckformulaforadoubletrackshieldtunnelunderexpresswaysubgrade AT jiaxuandu modificationofthepeckformulaforadoubletrackshieldtunnelunderexpresswaysubgrade |