Eddy covariance emission and deposition flux measurements using proton transfer reaction – time of flight – mass spectrometry (PTR-TOF-MS): comparison with PTR-MS measured vertical gradients and fluxes

During summer 2010, a proton transfer reaction – time of flight – mass spectrometer (PTR-TOF-MS) and a quadrupole proton transfer reaction mass spectrometer (PTR-MS) were deployed simultaneously for one month in an orange orchard in the Central Valley of California to collect continuous data suitabl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. Weber, J. Karlik, S. Fares, J. Timkovsky, A. H. Goldstein, J.-H. Park, R. Holzinger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2013-02-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/13/1439/2013/acp-13-1439-2013.pdf
_version_ 1818033845381890048
author R. Weber
J. Karlik
S. Fares
J. Timkovsky
A. H. Goldstein
J.-H. Park
R. Holzinger
author_facet R. Weber
J. Karlik
S. Fares
J. Timkovsky
A. H. Goldstein
J.-H. Park
R. Holzinger
author_sort R. Weber
collection DOAJ
description During summer 2010, a proton transfer reaction – time of flight – mass spectrometer (PTR-TOF-MS) and a quadrupole proton transfer reaction mass spectrometer (PTR-MS) were deployed simultaneously for one month in an orange orchard in the Central Valley of California to collect continuous data suitable for eddy covariance (EC) flux calculations. The high time resolution (5 Hz) and high mass resolution (up to 5000 m/&Delta;m) data from the PTR-TOF-MS provided the basis for calculating the concentration and flux for a wide range of volatile organic compounds (VOC). Throughout the campaign, 664 mass peaks were detected in mass-to-charge ratios between 10 and 1278. Here we present PTR-TOF-MS EC fluxes of the 27 ion species for which the vertical gradient was simultaneously measured by PTR-MS. These EC flux data were validated through spectral analysis (i.e., co-spectrum, normalized co-spectrum, and ogive). Based on inter-comparison of the two PTR instruments, no significant instrumental biases were found in either mixing ratios or fluxes, and the data showed agreement within 5% on average for methanol and acetone. For the measured biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOC), the EC fluxes from PTR-TOF-MS were in agreement with the qualitatively inferred flux directions from vertical gradient measurements by PTR-MS. For the 27 selected ion species reported here, the PTR-TOF-MS measured total (24 h) mean net flux of 299 μg C m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>. The dominant BVOC emissions from this site were monoterpenes (<i>m/z</i> 81.070 + <i>m/z</i> 137.131 + <i>m/z</i> 95.086, 34%, 102 μg C m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>) and methanol (<i>m/z</i> 33.032, 18%, 72 μg C m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>). The next largest fluxes were detected at the following masses (attribution in parenthesis): <i>m/z</i> 59.048 (mostly acetone, 12.2%, 36.5 μg C m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>), <i>m/z</i> 61.027 (mostly acetic acid, 11.9%, 35.7 μg C m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>), <i>m/z</i> 93.069 (para-cymene + toluene, 4.1%, 12.2 μg C m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>), <i>m/z</i> 45.033 (acetaldehyde, 3.8%, 11.5 μg C m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>), <i>m/z</i> 71.048 (methylvinylketone + methacrolein, 2.4%, 7.1 μg C m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>), and <i>m/z</i> 69.071 (isoprene + 2-methyl-3-butene-2-ol, 1.8%, 5.3 μg C m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>). Low levels of emission and/or deposition (<1.6% for each, 5.8% in total flux) were observed for the additional reported masses. Overall, our results show that EC flux measurements using PTR-TOF-MS is a powerful new tool for characterizing the biosphere-atmosphere exchange including both emission and deposition for a large range of BVOC and their oxidation products.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T06:29:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d9f4a428315b4da5af6b8c7da7afe6e5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T06:29:44Z
publishDate 2013-02-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-d9f4a428315b4da5af6b8c7da7afe6e52022-12-22T01:59:08ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242013-02-011331439145610.5194/acp-13-1439-2013Eddy covariance emission and deposition flux measurements using proton transfer reaction &ndash; time of flight &ndash; mass spectrometry (PTR-TOF-MS): comparison with PTR-MS measured vertical gradients and fluxesR. WeberJ. KarlikS. FaresJ. TimkovskyA. H. GoldsteinJ.-H. ParkR. HolzingerDuring summer 2010, a proton transfer reaction – time of flight – mass spectrometer (PTR-TOF-MS) and a quadrupole proton transfer reaction mass spectrometer (PTR-MS) were deployed simultaneously for one month in an orange orchard in the Central Valley of California to collect continuous data suitable for eddy covariance (EC) flux calculations. The high time resolution (5 Hz) and high mass resolution (up to 5000 m/&Delta;m) data from the PTR-TOF-MS provided the basis for calculating the concentration and flux for a wide range of volatile organic compounds (VOC). Throughout the campaign, 664 mass peaks were detected in mass-to-charge ratios between 10 and 1278. Here we present PTR-TOF-MS EC fluxes of the 27 ion species for which the vertical gradient was simultaneously measured by PTR-MS. These EC flux data were validated through spectral analysis (i.e., co-spectrum, normalized co-spectrum, and ogive). Based on inter-comparison of the two PTR instruments, no significant instrumental biases were found in either mixing ratios or fluxes, and the data showed agreement within 5% on average for methanol and acetone. For the measured biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOC), the EC fluxes from PTR-TOF-MS were in agreement with the qualitatively inferred flux directions from vertical gradient measurements by PTR-MS. For the 27 selected ion species reported here, the PTR-TOF-MS measured total (24 h) mean net flux of 299 μg C m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>. The dominant BVOC emissions from this site were monoterpenes (<i>m/z</i> 81.070 + <i>m/z</i> 137.131 + <i>m/z</i> 95.086, 34%, 102 μg C m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>) and methanol (<i>m/z</i> 33.032, 18%, 72 μg C m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>). The next largest fluxes were detected at the following masses (attribution in parenthesis): <i>m/z</i> 59.048 (mostly acetone, 12.2%, 36.5 μg C m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>), <i>m/z</i> 61.027 (mostly acetic acid, 11.9%, 35.7 μg C m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>), <i>m/z</i> 93.069 (para-cymene + toluene, 4.1%, 12.2 μg C m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>), <i>m/z</i> 45.033 (acetaldehyde, 3.8%, 11.5 μg C m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>), <i>m/z</i> 71.048 (methylvinylketone + methacrolein, 2.4%, 7.1 μg C m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>), and <i>m/z</i> 69.071 (isoprene + 2-methyl-3-butene-2-ol, 1.8%, 5.3 μg C m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>). Low levels of emission and/or deposition (<1.6% for each, 5.8% in total flux) were observed for the additional reported masses. Overall, our results show that EC flux measurements using PTR-TOF-MS is a powerful new tool for characterizing the biosphere-atmosphere exchange including both emission and deposition for a large range of BVOC and their oxidation products.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/13/1439/2013/acp-13-1439-2013.pdf
spellingShingle R. Weber
J. Karlik
S. Fares
J. Timkovsky
A. H. Goldstein
J.-H. Park
R. Holzinger
Eddy covariance emission and deposition flux measurements using proton transfer reaction &ndash; time of flight &ndash; mass spectrometry (PTR-TOF-MS): comparison with PTR-MS measured vertical gradients and fluxes
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Eddy covariance emission and deposition flux measurements using proton transfer reaction &ndash; time of flight &ndash; mass spectrometry (PTR-TOF-MS): comparison with PTR-MS measured vertical gradients and fluxes
title_full Eddy covariance emission and deposition flux measurements using proton transfer reaction &ndash; time of flight &ndash; mass spectrometry (PTR-TOF-MS): comparison with PTR-MS measured vertical gradients and fluxes
title_fullStr Eddy covariance emission and deposition flux measurements using proton transfer reaction &ndash; time of flight &ndash; mass spectrometry (PTR-TOF-MS): comparison with PTR-MS measured vertical gradients and fluxes
title_full_unstemmed Eddy covariance emission and deposition flux measurements using proton transfer reaction &ndash; time of flight &ndash; mass spectrometry (PTR-TOF-MS): comparison with PTR-MS measured vertical gradients and fluxes
title_short Eddy covariance emission and deposition flux measurements using proton transfer reaction &ndash; time of flight &ndash; mass spectrometry (PTR-TOF-MS): comparison with PTR-MS measured vertical gradients and fluxes
title_sort eddy covariance emission and deposition flux measurements using proton transfer reaction ndash time of flight ndash mass spectrometry ptr tof ms comparison with ptr ms measured vertical gradients and fluxes
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/13/1439/2013/acp-13-1439-2013.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rweber eddycovarianceemissionanddepositionfluxmeasurementsusingprotontransferreactionndashtimeofflightndashmassspectrometryptrtofmscomparisonwithptrmsmeasuredverticalgradientsandfluxes
AT jkarlik eddycovarianceemissionanddepositionfluxmeasurementsusingprotontransferreactionndashtimeofflightndashmassspectrometryptrtofmscomparisonwithptrmsmeasuredverticalgradientsandfluxes
AT sfares eddycovarianceemissionanddepositionfluxmeasurementsusingprotontransferreactionndashtimeofflightndashmassspectrometryptrtofmscomparisonwithptrmsmeasuredverticalgradientsandfluxes
AT jtimkovsky eddycovarianceemissionanddepositionfluxmeasurementsusingprotontransferreactionndashtimeofflightndashmassspectrometryptrtofmscomparisonwithptrmsmeasuredverticalgradientsandfluxes
AT ahgoldstein eddycovarianceemissionanddepositionfluxmeasurementsusingprotontransferreactionndashtimeofflightndashmassspectrometryptrtofmscomparisonwithptrmsmeasuredverticalgradientsandfluxes
AT jhpark eddycovarianceemissionanddepositionfluxmeasurementsusingprotontransferreactionndashtimeofflightndashmassspectrometryptrtofmscomparisonwithptrmsmeasuredverticalgradientsandfluxes
AT rholzinger eddycovarianceemissionanddepositionfluxmeasurementsusingprotontransferreactionndashtimeofflightndashmassspectrometryptrtofmscomparisonwithptrmsmeasuredverticalgradientsandfluxes