A Life Cycle-Cost Analysis of Li-ion and Lead-Acid BESSs and Their Actively Hybridized ESSs With Supercapacitors for Islanded Microgrid Applications

The combination of supercapacitors (SCs) with Li-ion Batteries (LIBs) and Lead-Acid Batteries (LABs) as hybrid ESSs (HESSs) have widely been proposed for Microgrid (MG) applications. The SCs of HESSs eliminate the stress of surge currents on LIBs and LABs, which increases their life cycles, and decr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maryam Torkashvand, Abolfazl Khodadadi, Mehrdad Bagheri Sanjareh, Muhammad H. Nazary
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2020-01-01
Series:IEEE Access
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9170563/
_version_ 1818349847022927872
author Maryam Torkashvand
Abolfazl Khodadadi
Mehrdad Bagheri Sanjareh
Muhammad H. Nazary
author_facet Maryam Torkashvand
Abolfazl Khodadadi
Mehrdad Bagheri Sanjareh
Muhammad H. Nazary
author_sort Maryam Torkashvand
collection DOAJ
description The combination of supercapacitors (SCs) with Li-ion Batteries (LIBs) and Lead-Acid Batteries (LABs) as hybrid ESSs (HESSs) have widely been proposed for Microgrid (MG) applications. The SCs of HESSs eliminate the stress of surge currents on LIBs and LABs, which increases their life cycles, and decreases their life cycle costs and hence decreases the HESSs operational costs. However, the active topology of HESS, which is the most commonly used configuration, requires an extra SC and an extra DC/DC converter in comparison to the Battery Energy Storage (BESS) topology, which increases the HESS capital cost. This paper tries to investigate that the hybridization of LABs and LIBs with SCs is economically effective or not for applications in islanded MG. In this regard, an energy management and frequency control (EMFC) scheme is proposed for the operation of MG in islanded mode. Using the simulations of the proposed EMFC scheme for islanded MG, the size of main components of LIB ESS (LIBESS), LAB ESS (LABESS), LIB-SC HESS (LISHESS) and LAB-SC HESS (LASHESS) are calculated. The numerical results show that for a 10-year period operation in islanded MG, the LISHESS and LASHESS impose less cost than LIBESS and LABESS. Also, the LISHESS is cheaper (almost 11%) than LASHESS.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T18:12:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-da0868657b0c428e81aa7e664f9d9cc6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2169-3536
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T18:12:27Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher IEEE
record_format Article
series IEEE Access
spelling doaj.art-da0868657b0c428e81aa7e664f9d9cc62022-12-21T23:35:55ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362020-01-01815321515322510.1109/ACCESS.2020.30174589170563A Life Cycle-Cost Analysis of Li-ion and Lead-Acid BESSs and Their Actively Hybridized ESSs With Supercapacitors for Islanded Microgrid ApplicationsMaryam Torkashvand0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2290-1227Abolfazl Khodadadi1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4791-8380Mehrdad Bagheri Sanjareh2Muhammad H. Nazary3Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch, Tehran, IranDivision of Electric Power and Energy Systems, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, SwedenDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, IranDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Center of Excellence in Power Systems, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, IranThe combination of supercapacitors (SCs) with Li-ion Batteries (LIBs) and Lead-Acid Batteries (LABs) as hybrid ESSs (HESSs) have widely been proposed for Microgrid (MG) applications. The SCs of HESSs eliminate the stress of surge currents on LIBs and LABs, which increases their life cycles, and decreases their life cycle costs and hence decreases the HESSs operational costs. However, the active topology of HESS, which is the most commonly used configuration, requires an extra SC and an extra DC/DC converter in comparison to the Battery Energy Storage (BESS) topology, which increases the HESS capital cost. This paper tries to investigate that the hybridization of LABs and LIBs with SCs is economically effective or not for applications in islanded MG. In this regard, an energy management and frequency control (EMFC) scheme is proposed for the operation of MG in islanded mode. Using the simulations of the proposed EMFC scheme for islanded MG, the size of main components of LIB ESS (LIBESS), LAB ESS (LABESS), LIB-SC HESS (LISHESS) and LAB-SC HESS (LASHESS) are calculated. The numerical results show that for a 10-year period operation in islanded MG, the LISHESS and LASHESS impose less cost than LIBESS and LABESS. Also, the LISHESS is cheaper (almost 11%) than LASHESS.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9170563/Microgridli-ion batterylead-acid batterysupercapacitor
spellingShingle Maryam Torkashvand
Abolfazl Khodadadi
Mehrdad Bagheri Sanjareh
Muhammad H. Nazary
A Life Cycle-Cost Analysis of Li-ion and Lead-Acid BESSs and Their Actively Hybridized ESSs With Supercapacitors for Islanded Microgrid Applications
IEEE Access
Microgrid
li-ion battery
lead-acid battery
supercapacitor
title A Life Cycle-Cost Analysis of Li-ion and Lead-Acid BESSs and Their Actively Hybridized ESSs With Supercapacitors for Islanded Microgrid Applications
title_full A Life Cycle-Cost Analysis of Li-ion and Lead-Acid BESSs and Their Actively Hybridized ESSs With Supercapacitors for Islanded Microgrid Applications
title_fullStr A Life Cycle-Cost Analysis of Li-ion and Lead-Acid BESSs and Their Actively Hybridized ESSs With Supercapacitors for Islanded Microgrid Applications
title_full_unstemmed A Life Cycle-Cost Analysis of Li-ion and Lead-Acid BESSs and Their Actively Hybridized ESSs With Supercapacitors for Islanded Microgrid Applications
title_short A Life Cycle-Cost Analysis of Li-ion and Lead-Acid BESSs and Their Actively Hybridized ESSs With Supercapacitors for Islanded Microgrid Applications
title_sort life cycle cost analysis of li ion and lead acid besss and their actively hybridized esss with supercapacitors for islanded microgrid applications
topic Microgrid
li-ion battery
lead-acid battery
supercapacitor
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9170563/
work_keys_str_mv AT maryamtorkashvand alifecyclecostanalysisofliionandleadacidbesssandtheiractivelyhybridizedessswithsupercapacitorsforislandedmicrogridapplications
AT abolfazlkhodadadi alifecyclecostanalysisofliionandleadacidbesssandtheiractivelyhybridizedessswithsupercapacitorsforislandedmicrogridapplications
AT mehrdadbagherisanjareh alifecyclecostanalysisofliionandleadacidbesssandtheiractivelyhybridizedessswithsupercapacitorsforislandedmicrogridapplications
AT muhammadhnazary alifecyclecostanalysisofliionandleadacidbesssandtheiractivelyhybridizedessswithsupercapacitorsforislandedmicrogridapplications
AT maryamtorkashvand lifecyclecostanalysisofliionandleadacidbesssandtheiractivelyhybridizedessswithsupercapacitorsforislandedmicrogridapplications
AT abolfazlkhodadadi lifecyclecostanalysisofliionandleadacidbesssandtheiractivelyhybridizedessswithsupercapacitorsforislandedmicrogridapplications
AT mehrdadbagherisanjareh lifecyclecostanalysisofliionandleadacidbesssandtheiractivelyhybridizedessswithsupercapacitorsforislandedmicrogridapplications
AT muhammadhnazary lifecyclecostanalysisofliionandleadacidbesssandtheiractivelyhybridizedessswithsupercapacitorsforislandedmicrogridapplications