The interactions between soil–biosphere–atmosphere (ISBA) land surface model multi-energy balance (MEB) option in SURFEXv8 – Part 2: Introduction of a litter formulation and model evaluation for local-scale forest sites

Land surface models (LSMs) need to balance a complicated trade-off between computational cost and complexity in order to adequately represent the exchanges of energy, water and matter with the atmosphere and the ocean. Some current generation LSMs use a simplified or composite canopy approach that g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Napoly, A. Boone, P. Samuelsson, S. Gollvik, E. Martin, R. Seferian, D. Carrer, B. Decharme, L. Jarlan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2017-04-01
Series:Geoscientific Model Development
Online Access:http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/10/1621/2017/gmd-10-1621-2017.pdf
_version_ 1818449055426019328
author A. Napoly
A. Boone
P. Samuelsson
S. Gollvik
E. Martin
R. Seferian
D. Carrer
B. Decharme
L. Jarlan
author_facet A. Napoly
A. Boone
P. Samuelsson
S. Gollvik
E. Martin
R. Seferian
D. Carrer
B. Decharme
L. Jarlan
author_sort A. Napoly
collection DOAJ
description Land surface models (LSMs) need to balance a complicated trade-off between computational cost and complexity in order to adequately represent the exchanges of energy, water and matter with the atmosphere and the ocean. Some current generation LSMs use a simplified or composite canopy approach that generates recurrent errors in simulated soil temperature and turbulent fluxes. In response to these issues, a new version of the interactions between soil–biosphere–atmosphere (ISBA) land surface model has recently been developed that explicitly solves the transfer of energy and water from the upper canopy and the forest floor, which is characterized as a litter layer. The multi-energy balance (MEB) version of ISBA is first evaluated for three well-instrumented contrasting local-scale sites, and sensitivity tests are performed to explore the behavior of new model parameters. Second, ISBA-MEB is benchmarked against observations from 42 forested sites from the global micro-meteorological network (FLUXNET) for multiple annual cycles.<br><br>It is shown that ISBA-MEB outperforms the composite version of ISBA in improving the representation of soil temperature, ground, sensible and, to a lesser extent, latent heat fluxes. Both versions of ISBA give comparable results in terms of simulated latent heat flux because of the similar formulations of the water uptake and the stomatal resistance. However, MEB produces a better agreement with the observations of sensible heat flux than the previous version of ISBA for 87.5 % of the simulated years across the 42 forested FLUXNET sites. Most of this improvement arises owing to the improved simulation of the ground conduction flux, which is greatly improved using MEB, especially owing to the forest litter parameterization. It is also shown that certain processes are also modeled more realistically (such as the partitioning of evapotranspiration into transpiration and ground evaporation), even if certain statistical performances are neutral. The analyses demonstrate that the shading effect of the vegetation, the explicit treatment of turbulent transfer for the canopy and ground, and the insulating thermal and hydrological effects of the forest floor litter turn out to be essential for simulating the exchange of energy, water and matter across a large range of forest types and climates.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T20:29:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-da08a67ff94143b2aab0d3eb89e0aa82
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1991-959X
1991-9603
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T20:29:19Z
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Geoscientific Model Development
spelling doaj.art-da08a67ff94143b2aab0d3eb89e0aa822022-12-21T22:48:33ZengCopernicus PublicationsGeoscientific Model Development1991-959X1991-96032017-04-011041621164410.5194/gmd-10-1621-2017The interactions between soil–biosphere–atmosphere (ISBA) land surface model multi-energy balance (MEB) option in SURFEXv8 – Part 2: Introduction of a litter formulation and model evaluation for local-scale forest sitesA. Napoly0A. Boone1P. Samuelsson2S. Gollvik3E. Martin4R. Seferian5D. Carrer6B. Decharme7L. Jarlan8CNRM UMR 3589, Météo-France/CNRS, Toulouse, FranceCNRM UMR 3589, Météo-France/CNRS, Toulouse, FranceSwedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping, SwedenSwedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping, SwedenIRSTEA, U-R RECOVER, Aix en Provence, FranceCNRM UMR 3589, Météo-France/CNRS, Toulouse, FranceCNRM UMR 3589, Météo-France/CNRS, Toulouse, FranceCNRM UMR 3589, Météo-France/CNRS, Toulouse, FranceCentre d'études Spatiales de la Biosphère (CESBIO), Toulouse, FranceLand surface models (LSMs) need to balance a complicated trade-off between computational cost and complexity in order to adequately represent the exchanges of energy, water and matter with the atmosphere and the ocean. Some current generation LSMs use a simplified or composite canopy approach that generates recurrent errors in simulated soil temperature and turbulent fluxes. In response to these issues, a new version of the interactions between soil–biosphere–atmosphere (ISBA) land surface model has recently been developed that explicitly solves the transfer of energy and water from the upper canopy and the forest floor, which is characterized as a litter layer. The multi-energy balance (MEB) version of ISBA is first evaluated for three well-instrumented contrasting local-scale sites, and sensitivity tests are performed to explore the behavior of new model parameters. Second, ISBA-MEB is benchmarked against observations from 42 forested sites from the global micro-meteorological network (FLUXNET) for multiple annual cycles.<br><br>It is shown that ISBA-MEB outperforms the composite version of ISBA in improving the representation of soil temperature, ground, sensible and, to a lesser extent, latent heat fluxes. Both versions of ISBA give comparable results in terms of simulated latent heat flux because of the similar formulations of the water uptake and the stomatal resistance. However, MEB produces a better agreement with the observations of sensible heat flux than the previous version of ISBA for 87.5 % of the simulated years across the 42 forested FLUXNET sites. Most of this improvement arises owing to the improved simulation of the ground conduction flux, which is greatly improved using MEB, especially owing to the forest litter parameterization. It is also shown that certain processes are also modeled more realistically (such as the partitioning of evapotranspiration into transpiration and ground evaporation), even if certain statistical performances are neutral. The analyses demonstrate that the shading effect of the vegetation, the explicit treatment of turbulent transfer for the canopy and ground, and the insulating thermal and hydrological effects of the forest floor litter turn out to be essential for simulating the exchange of energy, water and matter across a large range of forest types and climates.http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/10/1621/2017/gmd-10-1621-2017.pdf
spellingShingle A. Napoly
A. Boone
P. Samuelsson
S. Gollvik
E. Martin
R. Seferian
D. Carrer
B. Decharme
L. Jarlan
The interactions between soil–biosphere–atmosphere (ISBA) land surface model multi-energy balance (MEB) option in SURFEXv8 – Part 2: Introduction of a litter formulation and model evaluation for local-scale forest sites
Geoscientific Model Development
title The interactions between soil–biosphere–atmosphere (ISBA) land surface model multi-energy balance (MEB) option in SURFEXv8 – Part 2: Introduction of a litter formulation and model evaluation for local-scale forest sites
title_full The interactions between soil–biosphere–atmosphere (ISBA) land surface model multi-energy balance (MEB) option in SURFEXv8 – Part 2: Introduction of a litter formulation and model evaluation for local-scale forest sites
title_fullStr The interactions between soil–biosphere–atmosphere (ISBA) land surface model multi-energy balance (MEB) option in SURFEXv8 – Part 2: Introduction of a litter formulation and model evaluation for local-scale forest sites
title_full_unstemmed The interactions between soil–biosphere–atmosphere (ISBA) land surface model multi-energy balance (MEB) option in SURFEXv8 – Part 2: Introduction of a litter formulation and model evaluation for local-scale forest sites
title_short The interactions between soil–biosphere–atmosphere (ISBA) land surface model multi-energy balance (MEB) option in SURFEXv8 – Part 2: Introduction of a litter formulation and model evaluation for local-scale forest sites
title_sort interactions between soil biosphere atmosphere isba land surface model multi energy balance meb option in surfexv8 part 2 introduction of a litter formulation and model evaluation for local scale forest sites
url http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/10/1621/2017/gmd-10-1621-2017.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT anapoly theinteractionsbetweensoilbiosphereatmosphereisbalandsurfacemodelmultienergybalancemeboptioninsurfexv8part2introductionofalitterformulationandmodelevaluationforlocalscaleforestsites
AT aboone theinteractionsbetweensoilbiosphereatmosphereisbalandsurfacemodelmultienergybalancemeboptioninsurfexv8part2introductionofalitterformulationandmodelevaluationforlocalscaleforestsites
AT psamuelsson theinteractionsbetweensoilbiosphereatmosphereisbalandsurfacemodelmultienergybalancemeboptioninsurfexv8part2introductionofalitterformulationandmodelevaluationforlocalscaleforestsites
AT sgollvik theinteractionsbetweensoilbiosphereatmosphereisbalandsurfacemodelmultienergybalancemeboptioninsurfexv8part2introductionofalitterformulationandmodelevaluationforlocalscaleforestsites
AT emartin theinteractionsbetweensoilbiosphereatmosphereisbalandsurfacemodelmultienergybalancemeboptioninsurfexv8part2introductionofalitterformulationandmodelevaluationforlocalscaleforestsites
AT rseferian theinteractionsbetweensoilbiosphereatmosphereisbalandsurfacemodelmultienergybalancemeboptioninsurfexv8part2introductionofalitterformulationandmodelevaluationforlocalscaleforestsites
AT dcarrer theinteractionsbetweensoilbiosphereatmosphereisbalandsurfacemodelmultienergybalancemeboptioninsurfexv8part2introductionofalitterformulationandmodelevaluationforlocalscaleforestsites
AT bdecharme theinteractionsbetweensoilbiosphereatmosphereisbalandsurfacemodelmultienergybalancemeboptioninsurfexv8part2introductionofalitterformulationandmodelevaluationforlocalscaleforestsites
AT ljarlan theinteractionsbetweensoilbiosphereatmosphereisbalandsurfacemodelmultienergybalancemeboptioninsurfexv8part2introductionofalitterformulationandmodelevaluationforlocalscaleforestsites
AT anapoly interactionsbetweensoilbiosphereatmosphereisbalandsurfacemodelmultienergybalancemeboptioninsurfexv8part2introductionofalitterformulationandmodelevaluationforlocalscaleforestsites
AT aboone interactionsbetweensoilbiosphereatmosphereisbalandsurfacemodelmultienergybalancemeboptioninsurfexv8part2introductionofalitterformulationandmodelevaluationforlocalscaleforestsites
AT psamuelsson interactionsbetweensoilbiosphereatmosphereisbalandsurfacemodelmultienergybalancemeboptioninsurfexv8part2introductionofalitterformulationandmodelevaluationforlocalscaleforestsites
AT sgollvik interactionsbetweensoilbiosphereatmosphereisbalandsurfacemodelmultienergybalancemeboptioninsurfexv8part2introductionofalitterformulationandmodelevaluationforlocalscaleforestsites
AT emartin interactionsbetweensoilbiosphereatmosphereisbalandsurfacemodelmultienergybalancemeboptioninsurfexv8part2introductionofalitterformulationandmodelevaluationforlocalscaleforestsites
AT rseferian interactionsbetweensoilbiosphereatmosphereisbalandsurfacemodelmultienergybalancemeboptioninsurfexv8part2introductionofalitterformulationandmodelevaluationforlocalscaleforestsites
AT dcarrer interactionsbetweensoilbiosphereatmosphereisbalandsurfacemodelmultienergybalancemeboptioninsurfexv8part2introductionofalitterformulationandmodelevaluationforlocalscaleforestsites
AT bdecharme interactionsbetweensoilbiosphereatmosphereisbalandsurfacemodelmultienergybalancemeboptioninsurfexv8part2introductionofalitterformulationandmodelevaluationforlocalscaleforestsites
AT ljarlan interactionsbetweensoilbiosphereatmosphereisbalandsurfacemodelmultienergybalancemeboptioninsurfexv8part2introductionofalitterformulationandmodelevaluationforlocalscaleforestsites