Dose Land Negotiation Policy Promote or Suppress Hidden Debts of Local Governments?

Using panel data from 275 prefecture-level cities in China spanning from 2003 to 2019, this paper employs the multiperiod difference-in-differences method to empirically analyze the policy effect of land negotiation policy on local governments’ hidden debt. The paper also investigates the influence...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yinglan Zhao, Jingwen Xu, Chen Feng, Chi Gong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-04-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/5/985
_version_ 1797599473608687616
author Yinglan Zhao
Jingwen Xu
Chen Feng
Chi Gong
author_facet Yinglan Zhao
Jingwen Xu
Chen Feng
Chi Gong
author_sort Yinglan Zhao
collection DOAJ
description Using panel data from 275 prefecture-level cities in China spanning from 2003 to 2019, this paper employs the multiperiod difference-in-differences method to empirically analyze the policy effect of land negotiation policy on local governments’ hidden debt. The paper also investigates the influence mechanisms of land finance, budget soft constraints, fiscal decentralization and government competition. The empirical results reveal that: (1) Land negotiations promote the expansion of local governments’ hidden debt, which is counterproductive to the sustainable development of government finances. (2) The impact of land negotiation policy on local government’s hidden debt is transmitted via its effects on land finance. (3) The greater the degree of soft budget constraint and the degree of government competition, the less the expansion effect of land negotiations on the hidden debt of the government. The greater the degree of fiscal decentralization, the greater the expansion effect of land negotiations on the government’s hidden debt. (4) Land negotiation promotes the expansion of hidden debt in eastern China and inhibits it in central China, with no significant effect observed in western China. (5) Cities with larger urban scale and higher economic development levels experience stronger effects from land negotiation policies. Therefore, it is imperative to deepen the land negotiation system further, develop policy indicators and feedback mechanisms tailored to local conditions, and introduce a multiparty supervision system to enhance implementation of the land negotiation system.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T03:34:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-da3142f6ae8c458c816d88dd13cdab36
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-445X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T03:34:53Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Land
spelling doaj.art-da3142f6ae8c458c816d88dd13cdab362023-11-18T02:06:11ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2023-04-0112598510.3390/land12050985Dose Land Negotiation Policy Promote or Suppress Hidden Debts of Local Governments?Yinglan Zhao0Jingwen Xu1Chen Feng2Chi Gong3School of Economics, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610000, ChinaSchool of Economics, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610000, ChinaSchool of Economics, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610000, ChinaBusiness School, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130000, ChinaUsing panel data from 275 prefecture-level cities in China spanning from 2003 to 2019, this paper employs the multiperiod difference-in-differences method to empirically analyze the policy effect of land negotiation policy on local governments’ hidden debt. The paper also investigates the influence mechanisms of land finance, budget soft constraints, fiscal decentralization and government competition. The empirical results reveal that: (1) Land negotiations promote the expansion of local governments’ hidden debt, which is counterproductive to the sustainable development of government finances. (2) The impact of land negotiation policy on local government’s hidden debt is transmitted via its effects on land finance. (3) The greater the degree of soft budget constraint and the degree of government competition, the less the expansion effect of land negotiations on the hidden debt of the government. The greater the degree of fiscal decentralization, the greater the expansion effect of land negotiations on the government’s hidden debt. (4) Land negotiation promotes the expansion of hidden debt in eastern China and inhibits it in central China, with no significant effect observed in western China. (5) Cities with larger urban scale and higher economic development levels experience stronger effects from land negotiation policies. Therefore, it is imperative to deepen the land negotiation system further, develop policy indicators and feedback mechanisms tailored to local conditions, and introduce a multiparty supervision system to enhance implementation of the land negotiation system.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/5/985land negotiation policylocal government hidden debtmultiperiod difference-in-differences model
spellingShingle Yinglan Zhao
Jingwen Xu
Chen Feng
Chi Gong
Dose Land Negotiation Policy Promote or Suppress Hidden Debts of Local Governments?
Land
land negotiation policy
local government hidden debt
multiperiod difference-in-differences model
title Dose Land Negotiation Policy Promote or Suppress Hidden Debts of Local Governments?
title_full Dose Land Negotiation Policy Promote or Suppress Hidden Debts of Local Governments?
title_fullStr Dose Land Negotiation Policy Promote or Suppress Hidden Debts of Local Governments?
title_full_unstemmed Dose Land Negotiation Policy Promote or Suppress Hidden Debts of Local Governments?
title_short Dose Land Negotiation Policy Promote or Suppress Hidden Debts of Local Governments?
title_sort dose land negotiation policy promote or suppress hidden debts of local governments
topic land negotiation policy
local government hidden debt
multiperiod difference-in-differences model
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/5/985
work_keys_str_mv AT yinglanzhao doselandnegotiationpolicypromoteorsuppresshiddendebtsoflocalgovernments
AT jingwenxu doselandnegotiationpolicypromoteorsuppresshiddendebtsoflocalgovernments
AT chenfeng doselandnegotiationpolicypromoteorsuppresshiddendebtsoflocalgovernments
AT chigong doselandnegotiationpolicypromoteorsuppresshiddendebtsoflocalgovernments