Minimally invasive spinal surgery in spinal infections – A review

The incidence of hematogenous vertebral osteomyelitis is increasing parallel to longer life expectancies, chronic disease, better diagnostic techniques, indwelling intravascular catheters and immunosuppressive therapy. In Sub-Saharan African countries the number of reported spinal tuberculosis cases...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adrian Kelly, Aftab Younus
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-09-01
Series:Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751919303949
_version_ 1818162036992901120
author Adrian Kelly
Aftab Younus
author_facet Adrian Kelly
Aftab Younus
author_sort Adrian Kelly
collection DOAJ
description The incidence of hematogenous vertebral osteomyelitis is increasing parallel to longer life expectancies, chronic disease, better diagnostic techniques, indwelling intravascular catheters and immunosuppressive therapy. In Sub-Saharan African countries the number of reported spinal tuberculosis cases has tripled secondary to the Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome pandemic. Most patients with spinal infections can be successfully treated non-operatively. Medical management is particularly successful before significant bony destruction has taken place. In patients that require surgical intervention several recent studies have shown that MISS, applied to the treatment of spinal infections, demonstrates significant advantages over the open approaches. In the thoracic spine the exact site of the focus of infection and the extent of kyphosis determines the ideal surgical approach. The following MISS approaches to the thoracic spine are currently utilized 1. Mini-thoracotomy; 2. Mini-open thoracoscopically assisted thoracotomy (MOTA); 3. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS); 4. Video assisted telescopic operating microscope assisted thoracotomy (VITOM thoracotomy); and 5. Percutaneous thoracic fixation. Regarding infections of the lumbar spine neurological complications are uncommon as compared to infection of the thoracic spine. Newer MISS approaches to the lumbar spine utilized in the context of lumbar tuberculosis are the MISS Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, MISS Extreme lateral lumbar body interbody fusion and the MISS anterior lumbar interbody fusion. The use of endoscopic spinal decompression in the management of infections of the lumbar spine is a relatively new technique and incurs inherently minimal tissue damage. Minimally invasive anterior approaches to the cervical spine are not commonly performed. MISS-microsurgical anterior approach in the context of cervical spine infection have however been reported. MISS posterior approaches to the cervical spine are also being performed. We aimed to provide a review of the MISS approaches currently in use to treat spinal infections to assist spinal surgeons whom manage this problem.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T16:27:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-da396023a97a4442b22c0b2ace7b43b8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2214-7519
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T16:27:17Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery
spelling doaj.art-da396023a97a4442b22c0b2ace7b43b82022-12-22T00:58:41ZengElsevierInterdisciplinary Neurosurgery2214-75192020-09-0121100749Minimally invasive spinal surgery in spinal infections – A reviewAdrian Kelly0Aftab Younus1Department of Neurosurgery, Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa; Corresponding author.Department of Orthopedics, Helen Joseph Hospital, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaThe incidence of hematogenous vertebral osteomyelitis is increasing parallel to longer life expectancies, chronic disease, better diagnostic techniques, indwelling intravascular catheters and immunosuppressive therapy. In Sub-Saharan African countries the number of reported spinal tuberculosis cases has tripled secondary to the Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome pandemic. Most patients with spinal infections can be successfully treated non-operatively. Medical management is particularly successful before significant bony destruction has taken place. In patients that require surgical intervention several recent studies have shown that MISS, applied to the treatment of spinal infections, demonstrates significant advantages over the open approaches. In the thoracic spine the exact site of the focus of infection and the extent of kyphosis determines the ideal surgical approach. The following MISS approaches to the thoracic spine are currently utilized 1. Mini-thoracotomy; 2. Mini-open thoracoscopically assisted thoracotomy (MOTA); 3. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS); 4. Video assisted telescopic operating microscope assisted thoracotomy (VITOM thoracotomy); and 5. Percutaneous thoracic fixation. Regarding infections of the lumbar spine neurological complications are uncommon as compared to infection of the thoracic spine. Newer MISS approaches to the lumbar spine utilized in the context of lumbar tuberculosis are the MISS Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, MISS Extreme lateral lumbar body interbody fusion and the MISS anterior lumbar interbody fusion. The use of endoscopic spinal decompression in the management of infections of the lumbar spine is a relatively new technique and incurs inherently minimal tissue damage. Minimally invasive anterior approaches to the cervical spine are not commonly performed. MISS-microsurgical anterior approach in the context of cervical spine infection have however been reported. MISS posterior approaches to the cervical spine are also being performed. We aimed to provide a review of the MISS approaches currently in use to treat spinal infections to assist spinal surgeons whom manage this problem.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751919303949Minimally invasive spinal infectionsSpinal tuberculosis
spellingShingle Adrian Kelly
Aftab Younus
Minimally invasive spinal surgery in spinal infections – A review
Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery
Minimally invasive spinal infections
Spinal tuberculosis
title Minimally invasive spinal surgery in spinal infections – A review
title_full Minimally invasive spinal surgery in spinal infections – A review
title_fullStr Minimally invasive spinal surgery in spinal infections – A review
title_full_unstemmed Minimally invasive spinal surgery in spinal infections – A review
title_short Minimally invasive spinal surgery in spinal infections – A review
title_sort minimally invasive spinal surgery in spinal infections a review
topic Minimally invasive spinal infections
Spinal tuberculosis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751919303949
work_keys_str_mv AT adriankelly minimallyinvasivespinalsurgeryinspinalinfectionsareview
AT aftabyounus minimallyinvasivespinalsurgeryinspinalinfectionsareview