Stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could enhance the terrestrial photosynthesis rate

Stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could impact the terrestrial carbon cycle by enhancing the carbon sink. With an 8 Tg yr<sup>−1</sup> injection of SO<sub>2</sub> to produce a stratospheric aerosol cloud to balance anthropogenic radiative forcing from the Representative...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. Xia, A. Robock, S. Tilmes, R. R. Neely III
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2016-02-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/16/1479/2016/acp-16-1479-2016.pdf
_version_ 1819085381288591360
author L. Xia
A. Robock
S. Tilmes
R. R. Neely III
R. R. Neely III
author_facet L. Xia
A. Robock
S. Tilmes
R. R. Neely III
R. R. Neely III
author_sort L. Xia
collection DOAJ
description Stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could impact the terrestrial carbon cycle by enhancing the carbon sink. With an 8 Tg yr<sup>−1</sup> injection of SO<sub>2</sub> to produce a stratospheric aerosol cloud to balance anthropogenic radiative forcing from the Representative Concentration Pathway 6.0 (RCP6.0) scenario, we conducted climate model simulations with the Community Earth System Model – the Community Atmospheric Model 4 fully coupled to tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry (CAM4–chem). During the geoengineering period, as compared to RCP6.0, land-averaged downward visible (300–700 nm) diffuse radiation increased 3.2 W m<sup>−2</sup> (11 %). The enhanced diffuse radiation combined with the cooling increased plant photosynthesis by 0.07 ± 0.02 µmol C m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>, which could contribute to an additional 3.8 ± 1.1 Gt C yr<sup>−1</sup> global gross primary productivity without explicit nutrient limitation. This increase could potentially increase the land carbon sink. Suppressed plant and soil respiration due to the cooling would reduce natural land carbon emission and therefore further enhance the terrestrial carbon sink during the geoengineering period. This potentially beneficial impact of stratospheric sulfate geoengineering would need to be balanced by a large number of potential risks in any future decisions about the implementation of geoengineering.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T21:03:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-da44162d623b40afb2a7b6e6b61d5907
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T21:03:27Z
publishDate 2016-02-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-da44162d623b40afb2a7b6e6b61d59072022-12-21T18:50:22ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242016-02-01161479148910.5194/acp-16-1479-2016Stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could enhance the terrestrial photosynthesis rateL. Xia0A. Robock1S. Tilmes2R. R. Neely III3R. R. Neely III4Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USADepartment of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USANational Center for Atmospheric Research, Atmospheric Chemistry Division, Boulder, CO, USANational Center for Atmospheric Research, Atmospheric Chemistry Division, Boulder, CO, USANational Centre for Atmospheric Science and the Institute of Climate and Atmospheric Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UKStratospheric sulfate geoengineering could impact the terrestrial carbon cycle by enhancing the carbon sink. With an 8 Tg yr<sup>−1</sup> injection of SO<sub>2</sub> to produce a stratospheric aerosol cloud to balance anthropogenic radiative forcing from the Representative Concentration Pathway 6.0 (RCP6.0) scenario, we conducted climate model simulations with the Community Earth System Model – the Community Atmospheric Model 4 fully coupled to tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry (CAM4–chem). During the geoengineering period, as compared to RCP6.0, land-averaged downward visible (300–700 nm) diffuse radiation increased 3.2 W m<sup>−2</sup> (11 %). The enhanced diffuse radiation combined with the cooling increased plant photosynthesis by 0.07 ± 0.02 µmol C m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>, which could contribute to an additional 3.8 ± 1.1 Gt C yr<sup>−1</sup> global gross primary productivity without explicit nutrient limitation. This increase could potentially increase the land carbon sink. Suppressed plant and soil respiration due to the cooling would reduce natural land carbon emission and therefore further enhance the terrestrial carbon sink during the geoengineering period. This potentially beneficial impact of stratospheric sulfate geoengineering would need to be balanced by a large number of potential risks in any future decisions about the implementation of geoengineering.https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/16/1479/2016/acp-16-1479-2016.pdf
spellingShingle L. Xia
A. Robock
S. Tilmes
R. R. Neely III
R. R. Neely III
Stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could enhance the terrestrial photosynthesis rate
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could enhance the terrestrial photosynthesis rate
title_full Stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could enhance the terrestrial photosynthesis rate
title_fullStr Stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could enhance the terrestrial photosynthesis rate
title_full_unstemmed Stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could enhance the terrestrial photosynthesis rate
title_short Stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could enhance the terrestrial photosynthesis rate
title_sort stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could enhance the terrestrial photosynthesis rate
url https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/16/1479/2016/acp-16-1479-2016.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT lxia stratosphericsulfategeoengineeringcouldenhancetheterrestrialphotosynthesisrate
AT arobock stratosphericsulfategeoengineeringcouldenhancetheterrestrialphotosynthesisrate
AT stilmes stratosphericsulfategeoengineeringcouldenhancetheterrestrialphotosynthesisrate
AT rrneelyiii stratosphericsulfategeoengineeringcouldenhancetheterrestrialphotosynthesisrate
AT rrneelyiii stratosphericsulfategeoengineeringcouldenhancetheterrestrialphotosynthesisrate