Rural-based Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics teachers’ and learners’ acceptance of mobile learning

Background: Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) is faced with many challenges resulting in learners’ poor performance at matriculation level in South Africa. However, prior research has shown that mobile learning (m-learning) can be used to alleviate the challenges of STEM educat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Mutambara, Anass Bayaga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2020-09-01
Series:South African Journal of Information Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://sajim.co.za/index.php/sajim/article/view/1200
_version_ 1818134121147269120
author David Mutambara
Anass Bayaga
author_facet David Mutambara
Anass Bayaga
author_sort David Mutambara
collection DOAJ
description Background: Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) is faced with many challenges resulting in learners’ poor performance at matriculation level in South Africa. However, prior research has shown that mobile learning (m-learning) can be used to alleviate the challenges of STEM education. Prior research focused on tertiary institutions’ students and lecturers, in developed countries. However, very little is known about rural school STEM teachers’ and learners’ acceptance of m-learning. Objectives: The article investigates factors that rural-based STEM teachers and learners consider important when adopting mobile learning. Furthermore, the study also seeks to examine if there is a statistically significant difference between teachers’ and learners’ acceptance of mobile learning. Method: The research employed a quantitative approach. Stratified random sampling was used to select 350 teachers and learners to participate in the survey. Valid questionnaires received were 288 (82%), and data were analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling. Results: The proposed model explained 64% of the variance in rural-based STEM teachers’ and learners’ behavioural intention to use m-learning. Perceived attitude towards use was found to be the best predictor of teachers’ and learners’ behavioural intention. The results also showed no significant difference between teachers’ and learners’ path coefficients. Conclusion: The research recommends that awareness campaigns, infrastructure, mobile devices and data need to be made available for m-learning to be successfully adopted in rural areas.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T09:03:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-da455872feaf42c59b428b8858c625dc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2078-1865
1560-683X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T09:03:35Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher AOSIS
record_format Article
series South African Journal of Information Management
spelling doaj.art-da455872feaf42c59b428b8858c625dc2022-12-22T01:13:41ZengAOSISSouth African Journal of Information Management2078-18651560-683X2020-09-01221e1e1010.4102/sajim.v22i1.1200650Rural-based Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics teachers’ and learners’ acceptance of mobile learningDavid Mutambara0Anass Bayaga1Department of Maths, Science and Technology Education, Faculty of Education, University of Zululand, Richards BayDepartment of Maths, Science and Technology Education, Faculty of Education, University of Zululand, Richards BayBackground: Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) is faced with many challenges resulting in learners’ poor performance at matriculation level in South Africa. However, prior research has shown that mobile learning (m-learning) can be used to alleviate the challenges of STEM education. Prior research focused on tertiary institutions’ students and lecturers, in developed countries. However, very little is known about rural school STEM teachers’ and learners’ acceptance of m-learning. Objectives: The article investigates factors that rural-based STEM teachers and learners consider important when adopting mobile learning. Furthermore, the study also seeks to examine if there is a statistically significant difference between teachers’ and learners’ acceptance of mobile learning. Method: The research employed a quantitative approach. Stratified random sampling was used to select 350 teachers and learners to participate in the survey. Valid questionnaires received were 288 (82%), and data were analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling. Results: The proposed model explained 64% of the variance in rural-based STEM teachers’ and learners’ behavioural intention to use m-learning. Perceived attitude towards use was found to be the best predictor of teachers’ and learners’ behavioural intention. The results also showed no significant difference between teachers’ and learners’ path coefficients. Conclusion: The research recommends that awareness campaigns, infrastructure, mobile devices and data need to be made available for m-learning to be successfully adopted in rural areas.https://sajim.co.za/index.php/sajim/article/view/1200technology acceptance modelperceived social influenceperceived resourcesstemperceived usefulnessperceived ease of useperceived ease to collaborate.
spellingShingle David Mutambara
Anass Bayaga
Rural-based Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics teachers’ and learners’ acceptance of mobile learning
South African Journal of Information Management
technology acceptance model
perceived social influence
perceived resources
stem
perceived usefulness
perceived ease of use
perceived ease to collaborate.
title Rural-based Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics teachers’ and learners’ acceptance of mobile learning
title_full Rural-based Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics teachers’ and learners’ acceptance of mobile learning
title_fullStr Rural-based Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics teachers’ and learners’ acceptance of mobile learning
title_full_unstemmed Rural-based Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics teachers’ and learners’ acceptance of mobile learning
title_short Rural-based Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics teachers’ and learners’ acceptance of mobile learning
title_sort rural based science technology engineering and mathematics teachers and learners acceptance of mobile learning
topic technology acceptance model
perceived social influence
perceived resources
stem
perceived usefulness
perceived ease of use
perceived ease to collaborate.
url https://sajim.co.za/index.php/sajim/article/view/1200
work_keys_str_mv AT davidmutambara ruralbasedsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathematicsteachersandlearnersacceptanceofmobilelearning
AT anassbayaga ruralbasedsciencetechnologyengineeringandmathematicsteachersandlearnersacceptanceofmobilelearning