Comparison of glottic visualisation and ease of intubation with different laryngoscope blades

Context: Literature suggests glottic view is better with straight blades while tracheal intubation is easier with curved blades. Aims: To compare glottic view and ease of intubation with Macintosh, Miller, McCoy blades and the Trueview® laryngoscope. Settings and Design: This prospective randomised...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Atul P Kulkarni, Amar S Tirmanwar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2013-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2013;volume=57;issue=2;spage=170;epage=174;aulast=Kulkarni
_version_ 1819024282768900096
author Atul P Kulkarni
Amar S Tirmanwar
author_facet Atul P Kulkarni
Amar S Tirmanwar
author_sort Atul P Kulkarni
collection DOAJ
description Context: Literature suggests glottic view is better with straight blades while tracheal intubation is easier with curved blades. Aims: To compare glottic view and ease of intubation with Macintosh, Miller, McCoy blades and the Trueview® laryngoscope. Settings and Design: This prospective randomised study was undertaken in operation theatres of a 550 bedded tertiary referral cancer centre after approval from the Institutional Review Board. Methods: We compared the Macintosh, Miller, McCoy blades and the Trueview® laryngoscope for glottic visualisation and ease of tracheal intubation; in 120 patients undergoing elective cancer surgery; randomly divided into four groups. After induction of anaesthesia laryngoscopy was performed and trachea intubated. We recorded: Visualisation of glottis (Cormack Lehane grade), ease of intubation, number of attempts; need to change the blade and need for external laryngeal manipulation. Statistical Analysis: Demographic data, Mallampati classification were compared using the Chi-square test. A P<0.05 was considered significant. Results: Grade 1 view was obtained most often (87% patients) with Trueview® laryngoscope. Intubation was easier (Grade 1) with Trueview® and McCoy blades (93% each). Seven patients needed two attempts; one patient in Miller group needed three attempts. No patient in McCoy and Trueview® Groups required external laryngeal manipulation. Conclusions: We found that in patients with normal airway glottis was best visualised with Miller blade and Trueview® laryngoscope however, the trachea was more easily intubated with McCoy and Macintosh blades and Trueview® laryngoscope.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T04:52:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-da49ce6cce844b67a966490febe02d28
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0019-5049
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T04:52:19Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
spelling doaj.art-da49ce6cce844b67a966490febe02d282022-12-21T19:15:24ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Anaesthesia0019-50492013-01-0157217017410.4103/0019-5049.111846Comparison of glottic visualisation and ease of intubation with different laryngoscope bladesAtul P KulkarniAmar S TirmanwarContext: Literature suggests glottic view is better with straight blades while tracheal intubation is easier with curved blades. Aims: To compare glottic view and ease of intubation with Macintosh, Miller, McCoy blades and the Trueview® laryngoscope. Settings and Design: This prospective randomised study was undertaken in operation theatres of a 550 bedded tertiary referral cancer centre after approval from the Institutional Review Board. Methods: We compared the Macintosh, Miller, McCoy blades and the Trueview® laryngoscope for glottic visualisation and ease of tracheal intubation; in 120 patients undergoing elective cancer surgery; randomly divided into four groups. After induction of anaesthesia laryngoscopy was performed and trachea intubated. We recorded: Visualisation of glottis (Cormack Lehane grade), ease of intubation, number of attempts; need to change the blade and need for external laryngeal manipulation. Statistical Analysis: Demographic data, Mallampati classification were compared using the Chi-square test. A P<0.05 was considered significant. Results: Grade 1 view was obtained most often (87% patients) with Trueview® laryngoscope. Intubation was easier (Grade 1) with Trueview® and McCoy blades (93% each). Seven patients needed two attempts; one patient in Miller group needed three attempts. No patient in McCoy and Trueview® Groups required external laryngeal manipulation. Conclusions: We found that in patients with normal airway glottis was best visualised with Miller blade and Trueview® laryngoscope however, the trachea was more easily intubated with McCoy and Macintosh blades and Trueview® laryngoscope.http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2013;volume=57;issue=2;spage=170;epage=174;aulast=KulkarniCormack lehane gradeexternal laryngeal manipulationintubationlaryngoscopy
spellingShingle Atul P Kulkarni
Amar S Tirmanwar
Comparison of glottic visualisation and ease of intubation with different laryngoscope blades
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
Cormack lehane grade
external laryngeal manipulation
intubation
laryngoscopy
title Comparison of glottic visualisation and ease of intubation with different laryngoscope blades
title_full Comparison of glottic visualisation and ease of intubation with different laryngoscope blades
title_fullStr Comparison of glottic visualisation and ease of intubation with different laryngoscope blades
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of glottic visualisation and ease of intubation with different laryngoscope blades
title_short Comparison of glottic visualisation and ease of intubation with different laryngoscope blades
title_sort comparison of glottic visualisation and ease of intubation with different laryngoscope blades
topic Cormack lehane grade
external laryngeal manipulation
intubation
laryngoscopy
url http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2013;volume=57;issue=2;spage=170;epage=174;aulast=Kulkarni
work_keys_str_mv AT atulpkulkarni comparisonofglotticvisualisationandeaseofintubationwithdifferentlaryngoscopeblades
AT amarstirmanwar comparisonofglotticvisualisationandeaseofintubationwithdifferentlaryngoscopeblades