Comparison of glottic visualisation and ease of intubation with different laryngoscope blades
Context: Literature suggests glottic view is better with straight blades while tracheal intubation is easier with curved blades. Aims: To compare glottic view and ease of intubation with Macintosh, Miller, McCoy blades and the Trueview® laryngoscope. Settings and Design: This prospective randomised...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2013-01-01
|
Series: | Indian Journal of Anaesthesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2013;volume=57;issue=2;spage=170;epage=174;aulast=Kulkarni |
_version_ | 1819024282768900096 |
---|---|
author | Atul P Kulkarni Amar S Tirmanwar |
author_facet | Atul P Kulkarni Amar S Tirmanwar |
author_sort | Atul P Kulkarni |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Context: Literature suggests glottic view is better with straight blades while tracheal intubation is easier with curved blades. Aims: To compare glottic view and ease of intubation with Macintosh, Miller, McCoy blades and the Trueview® laryngoscope. Settings and Design: This prospective randomised study was undertaken in operation theatres of a 550 bedded tertiary referral cancer centre after approval from the Institutional Review Board. Methods: We compared the Macintosh, Miller, McCoy blades and the Trueview® laryngoscope for glottic visualisation and ease of tracheal intubation; in 120 patients undergoing elective cancer surgery; randomly divided into four groups. After induction of anaesthesia laryngoscopy was performed and trachea intubated. We recorded: Visualisation of glottis (Cormack Lehane grade), ease of intubation, number of attempts; need to change the blade and need for external laryngeal manipulation. Statistical Analysis: Demographic data, Mallampati classification were compared using the Chi-square test. A P<0.05 was considered significant. Results: Grade 1 view was obtained most often (87% patients) with Trueview® laryngoscope. Intubation was easier (Grade 1) with Trueview® and McCoy blades (93% each). Seven patients needed two attempts; one patient in Miller group needed three attempts. No patient in McCoy and Trueview® Groups required external laryngeal manipulation. Conclusions: We found that in patients with normal airway glottis was best visualised with Miller blade and Trueview® laryngoscope however, the trachea was more easily intubated with McCoy and Macintosh blades and Trueview® laryngoscope. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-21T04:52:19Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-da49ce6cce844b67a966490febe02d28 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0019-5049 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-21T04:52:19Z |
publishDate | 2013-01-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Indian Journal of Anaesthesia |
spelling | doaj.art-da49ce6cce844b67a966490febe02d282022-12-21T19:15:24ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Anaesthesia0019-50492013-01-0157217017410.4103/0019-5049.111846Comparison of glottic visualisation and ease of intubation with different laryngoscope bladesAtul P KulkarniAmar S TirmanwarContext: Literature suggests glottic view is better with straight blades while tracheal intubation is easier with curved blades. Aims: To compare glottic view and ease of intubation with Macintosh, Miller, McCoy blades and the Trueview® laryngoscope. Settings and Design: This prospective randomised study was undertaken in operation theatres of a 550 bedded tertiary referral cancer centre after approval from the Institutional Review Board. Methods: We compared the Macintosh, Miller, McCoy blades and the Trueview® laryngoscope for glottic visualisation and ease of tracheal intubation; in 120 patients undergoing elective cancer surgery; randomly divided into four groups. After induction of anaesthesia laryngoscopy was performed and trachea intubated. We recorded: Visualisation of glottis (Cormack Lehane grade), ease of intubation, number of attempts; need to change the blade and need for external laryngeal manipulation. Statistical Analysis: Demographic data, Mallampati classification were compared using the Chi-square test. A P<0.05 was considered significant. Results: Grade 1 view was obtained most often (87% patients) with Trueview® laryngoscope. Intubation was easier (Grade 1) with Trueview® and McCoy blades (93% each). Seven patients needed two attempts; one patient in Miller group needed three attempts. No patient in McCoy and Trueview® Groups required external laryngeal manipulation. Conclusions: We found that in patients with normal airway glottis was best visualised with Miller blade and Trueview® laryngoscope however, the trachea was more easily intubated with McCoy and Macintosh blades and Trueview® laryngoscope.http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2013;volume=57;issue=2;spage=170;epage=174;aulast=KulkarniCormack lehane gradeexternal laryngeal manipulationintubationlaryngoscopy |
spellingShingle | Atul P Kulkarni Amar S Tirmanwar Comparison of glottic visualisation and ease of intubation with different laryngoscope blades Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Cormack lehane grade external laryngeal manipulation intubation laryngoscopy |
title | Comparison of glottic visualisation and ease of intubation with different laryngoscope blades |
title_full | Comparison of glottic visualisation and ease of intubation with different laryngoscope blades |
title_fullStr | Comparison of glottic visualisation and ease of intubation with different laryngoscope blades |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of glottic visualisation and ease of intubation with different laryngoscope blades |
title_short | Comparison of glottic visualisation and ease of intubation with different laryngoscope blades |
title_sort | comparison of glottic visualisation and ease of intubation with different laryngoscope blades |
topic | Cormack lehane grade external laryngeal manipulation intubation laryngoscopy |
url | http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2013;volume=57;issue=2;spage=170;epage=174;aulast=Kulkarni |
work_keys_str_mv | AT atulpkulkarni comparisonofglotticvisualisationandeaseofintubationwithdifferentlaryngoscopeblades AT amarstirmanwar comparisonofglotticvisualisationandeaseofintubationwithdifferentlaryngoscopeblades |