Risk-adjusted cesarean section rates for the assessment of physician performance in Taiwan: a population-based study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Over the past decade, about one-third of all births nationwide in Taiwan were delivered by cesarean section (CS). Previous studies in the US and Europe have documented the need for risk adjustment for fairer comparisons among provide...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Su Hung-Wen, Hsu Chun-Sen, Wang Han-I, Tang Chao-Hsiun, Chen Mei-Ju, Lin Herng-Ching
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2006-10-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/6/246
_version_ 1811297716481818624
author Su Hung-Wen
Hsu Chun-Sen
Wang Han-I
Tang Chao-Hsiun
Chen Mei-Ju
Lin Herng-Ching
author_facet Su Hung-Wen
Hsu Chun-Sen
Wang Han-I
Tang Chao-Hsiun
Chen Mei-Ju
Lin Herng-Ching
author_sort Su Hung-Wen
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Over the past decade, about one-third of all births nationwide in Taiwan were delivered by cesarean section (CS). Previous studies in the US and Europe have documented the need for risk adjustment for fairer comparisons among providers. In this study, we set out to determine the impact that adjustment for patient-specific risk factors has on CS among different physicians in Taiwan.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>There were 172,511 live births which occurred in either hospitals or obstetrics/gynecology clinics between 1 January and 31 December 2003, and for whom birth certificate data could be linked with National Health Insurance (NHI) claims data, available as the sample for this study. Physicians were divided into four equivalent groups based upon the quartile distribution of their crude (actual) CS rates. Stepwise logistic regressions were conducted to develop a predictive model and to determine the expected (risk-adjusted) CS rate and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each physician. The actual rates were then compared with the expected CS rates to see the proportion of physicians whose actual rates were below, within, or above the predicted CI in each quartile.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The proportion of physicians whose CS rates were above the predicted CI increased as the quartile moved to the higher level. However, more than half of the physicians whose actual rates were higher than the predicted CI were not in the highest quartile. Conversely, there were some physicians (40 of 258 physicians) in the highest quartile who were actually providing obstetric care that was appropriate to the risk. When a stricter standard was applied to the assessment of physician performance by excluding physicians in quartile 4 for predicting CS rates, as many as 60% of physicians were found to have higher CS rates than the predicted CI, and indeed, the CS rates of no physicians in either quartile 3 or quartile 4 were below the predicted CI.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Overall, our study found that the comparison of unadjusted CS rates might not provide a valid reflection of the quality of obstetric care delivered by physicians, and may ultimately lead to biased judgments by purchasers. Our study has also shown that when we changed the standard of quality assessment, the evaluation results also changed.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-13T06:08:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-da49f51f43634271bdded9904eb22f31
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T06:08:16Z
publishDate 2006-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-da49f51f43634271bdded9904eb22f312022-12-22T02:59:09ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582006-10-016124610.1186/1471-2458-6-246Risk-adjusted cesarean section rates for the assessment of physician performance in Taiwan: a population-based studySu Hung-WenHsu Chun-SenWang Han-ITang Chao-HsiunChen Mei-JuLin Herng-Ching<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Over the past decade, about one-third of all births nationwide in Taiwan were delivered by cesarean section (CS). Previous studies in the US and Europe have documented the need for risk adjustment for fairer comparisons among providers. In this study, we set out to determine the impact that adjustment for patient-specific risk factors has on CS among different physicians in Taiwan.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>There were 172,511 live births which occurred in either hospitals or obstetrics/gynecology clinics between 1 January and 31 December 2003, and for whom birth certificate data could be linked with National Health Insurance (NHI) claims data, available as the sample for this study. Physicians were divided into four equivalent groups based upon the quartile distribution of their crude (actual) CS rates. Stepwise logistic regressions were conducted to develop a predictive model and to determine the expected (risk-adjusted) CS rate and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each physician. The actual rates were then compared with the expected CS rates to see the proportion of physicians whose actual rates were below, within, or above the predicted CI in each quartile.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The proportion of physicians whose CS rates were above the predicted CI increased as the quartile moved to the higher level. However, more than half of the physicians whose actual rates were higher than the predicted CI were not in the highest quartile. Conversely, there were some physicians (40 of 258 physicians) in the highest quartile who were actually providing obstetric care that was appropriate to the risk. When a stricter standard was applied to the assessment of physician performance by excluding physicians in quartile 4 for predicting CS rates, as many as 60% of physicians were found to have higher CS rates than the predicted CI, and indeed, the CS rates of no physicians in either quartile 3 or quartile 4 were below the predicted CI.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Overall, our study found that the comparison of unadjusted CS rates might not provide a valid reflection of the quality of obstetric care delivered by physicians, and may ultimately lead to biased judgments by purchasers. Our study has also shown that when we changed the standard of quality assessment, the evaluation results also changed.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/6/246
spellingShingle Su Hung-Wen
Hsu Chun-Sen
Wang Han-I
Tang Chao-Hsiun
Chen Mei-Ju
Lin Herng-Ching
Risk-adjusted cesarean section rates for the assessment of physician performance in Taiwan: a population-based study
BMC Public Health
title Risk-adjusted cesarean section rates for the assessment of physician performance in Taiwan: a population-based study
title_full Risk-adjusted cesarean section rates for the assessment of physician performance in Taiwan: a population-based study
title_fullStr Risk-adjusted cesarean section rates for the assessment of physician performance in Taiwan: a population-based study
title_full_unstemmed Risk-adjusted cesarean section rates for the assessment of physician performance in Taiwan: a population-based study
title_short Risk-adjusted cesarean section rates for the assessment of physician performance in Taiwan: a population-based study
title_sort risk adjusted cesarean section rates for the assessment of physician performance in taiwan a population based study
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/6/246
work_keys_str_mv AT suhungwen riskadjustedcesareansectionratesfortheassessmentofphysicianperformanceintaiwanapopulationbasedstudy
AT hsuchunsen riskadjustedcesareansectionratesfortheassessmentofphysicianperformanceintaiwanapopulationbasedstudy
AT wanghani riskadjustedcesareansectionratesfortheassessmentofphysicianperformanceintaiwanapopulationbasedstudy
AT tangchaohsiun riskadjustedcesareansectionratesfortheassessmentofphysicianperformanceintaiwanapopulationbasedstudy
AT chenmeiju riskadjustedcesareansectionratesfortheassessmentofphysicianperformanceintaiwanapopulationbasedstudy
AT linherngching riskadjustedcesareansectionratesfortheassessmentofphysicianperformanceintaiwanapopulationbasedstudy