Study on electrical measurement stress analysis of root attachment overdenture of three different mecha⁃ nisams
Objective To analyze the stress difference of alveolar bone around the abutment and alveolar ridge of edentulous of three different kinds of root⁃attachment⁃supported overdenture under different load conditions, in order to provide a reference for the choice of clinical root attachment. Methods Th...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | zho |
Published: |
Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
2017-03-01
|
Series: | 口腔疾病防治 |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.kqjbfz.com/EN/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2017.03.004 |
_version_ | 1818856155221327872 |
---|---|
author | LIU Ke GAO Jiu⁃yu MENG Yu⁃kun |
author_facet | LIU Ke GAO Jiu⁃yu MENG Yu⁃kun |
author_sort | LIU Ke |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objective To analyze the stress difference of alveolar bone around the abutment and alveolar ridge of
edentulous of three different kinds of root⁃attachment⁃supported overdenture under different load conditions, in order to
provide a reference for the choice of clinical root attachment. Methods The occlusal force of overdenture was simulat⁃
ed by electrical resistance strain measurement in vitro. The stress of the alveolar bone, the central part of the mandibu⁃
lar arch and the first molar correspond to the alveolar ridge were measured. The stress difference of 3 kinds of attach⁃
ment overdenture under different loading conditions were compared and analyzed. Results Under the same loading
condition, all three kinds of overdentures had a certain degree of slip of the denture (magnetic attachment denture) or ro⁃
tation (3 kinds of attachment dentures). The abutment neck in different parts of the dental arch and alveolar bone, anteri⁃
or free end edentulous alveolar ridge stress distribution was significantly different. Conclusion ERA attachment over⁃
denture was the most preferable, followed by the magnetic attachment overdenture. Suitable attachment should be select⁃
ed based on specific clinical cases. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-19T08:20:00Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-da6e2da3a390434f83f0f7a82ba4e5ca |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2096-1456 2096-1456 |
language | zho |
last_indexed | 2024-12-19T08:20:00Z |
publishDate | 2017-03-01 |
publisher | Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases |
record_format | Article |
series | 口腔疾病防治 |
spelling | doaj.art-da6e2da3a390434f83f0f7a82ba4e5ca2022-12-21T20:29:26ZzhoEditorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases口腔疾病防治2096-14562096-14562017-03-0125315916510.12016/j.issn.2096⁃1456.2017.03.004Study on electrical measurement stress analysis of root attachment overdenture of three different mecha⁃ nisamsLIU Ke0GAO Jiu⁃yu1MENG Yu⁃kun2Department of Stomatology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical UniversityDepartment of Dentistry, People′s HospitalDepartment of Prosthodontics, West China School of StomatologyObjective To analyze the stress difference of alveolar bone around the abutment and alveolar ridge of edentulous of three different kinds of root⁃attachment⁃supported overdenture under different load conditions, in order to provide a reference for the choice of clinical root attachment. Methods The occlusal force of overdenture was simulat⁃ ed by electrical resistance strain measurement in vitro. The stress of the alveolar bone, the central part of the mandibu⁃ lar arch and the first molar correspond to the alveolar ridge were measured. The stress difference of 3 kinds of attach⁃ ment overdenture under different loading conditions were compared and analyzed. Results Under the same loading condition, all three kinds of overdentures had a certain degree of slip of the denture (magnetic attachment denture) or ro⁃ tation (3 kinds of attachment dentures). The abutment neck in different parts of the dental arch and alveolar bone, anteri⁃ or free end edentulous alveolar ridge stress distribution was significantly different. Conclusion ERA attachment over⁃ denture was the most preferable, followed by the magnetic attachment overdenture. Suitable attachment should be select⁃ ed based on specific clinical cases.http://www.kqjbfz.com/EN/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2017.03.004Ball⁃cap attachmentMagnetic attachmentERA attachmentOverdentureElectrometric stress analysis |
spellingShingle | LIU Ke GAO Jiu⁃yu MENG Yu⁃kun Study on electrical measurement stress analysis of root attachment overdenture of three different mecha⁃ nisams 口腔疾病防治 Ball⁃cap attachment Magnetic attachment ERA attachment Overdenture Electrometric stress analysis |
title | Study on electrical measurement stress analysis of root attachment overdenture of three different mecha⁃ nisams |
title_full | Study on electrical measurement stress analysis of root attachment overdenture of three different mecha⁃ nisams |
title_fullStr | Study on electrical measurement stress analysis of root attachment overdenture of three different mecha⁃ nisams |
title_full_unstemmed | Study on electrical measurement stress analysis of root attachment overdenture of three different mecha⁃ nisams |
title_short | Study on electrical measurement stress analysis of root attachment overdenture of three different mecha⁃ nisams |
title_sort | study on electrical measurement stress analysis of root attachment overdenture of three different mecha⁃ nisams |
topic | Ball⁃cap attachment Magnetic attachment ERA attachment Overdenture Electrometric stress analysis |
url | http://www.kqjbfz.com/EN/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2017.03.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuke studyonelectricalmeasurementstressanalysisofrootattachmentoverdentureofthreedifferentmechanisams AT gaojiuyu studyonelectricalmeasurementstressanalysisofrootattachmentoverdentureofthreedifferentmechanisams AT mengyukun studyonelectricalmeasurementstressanalysisofrootattachmentoverdentureofthreedifferentmechanisams |