Xeloda as first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer-our experience

BACKGROUND: Results of phase III clinical studies comparing efficacy of Xeloda vs. standard 5-FU/FA protocols as first line therapy of metastatic colorectal carcinoma (MCRC), have shown better efficacy of Xeloda, with less toxic adverse effects, apart from handfoot syndrome. METHODS: From January 20...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kovčin Vladimir, Ješić Rada, Krivokapić Zoran V., Andrić Zoran, Pavlović Aleksandra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Oncology, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia 2002-01-01
Series:Archive of Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0354-7310/2002/0354-73100204249K.pdf
_version_ 1818833143571939328
author Kovčin Vladimir
Ješić Rada
Krivokapić Zoran V.
Andrić Zoran
Pavlović Aleksandra
author_facet Kovčin Vladimir
Ješić Rada
Krivokapić Zoran V.
Andrić Zoran
Pavlović Aleksandra
author_sort Kovčin Vladimir
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND: Results of phase III clinical studies comparing efficacy of Xeloda vs. standard 5-FU/FA protocols as first line therapy of metastatic colorectal carcinoma (MCRC), have shown better efficacy of Xeloda, with less toxic adverse effects, apart from handfoot syndrome. METHODS: From January 2000 to May 2001 the study enrolled 54 patients with MCRC, 38 males and 16 females, aged 30-78 years. All patients had metastatic diseases. In 33 the primary tumor was in colon, in 21 in rectum. All patients received Xeloda 2500 mg/m2/day in two daily doses, during 14 days followed by 7 days of pause. Dose intensity was 88,79% +/- 9,2. For efficacy evaluation the WHO criteria and tumor markers CEA and CA 19-9 were used. RESULTS: Overall response rate was 47%, with 13% complete responses, 34% partial responses 38% stable disease and 15% disease progression. No significant difference was found between patients with regard to localization of primary tumor (colon or rectum). There was no significant difference in response rate when compared 27 patients with adverse events of capecitabine ('hand and foot' syndrome and diarrhea) and those without them. Response rate in a subgroup of 21 evaluable (out of 29) patients with initial signs of liver dysfunction was worse (p<0.005) in comparison with patients with normal liver function. Most frequent adverse events were 'hand and foot' syndrome (52%) and diarrhea (24%), or both (14%). Other adverse events, up to grade 2 toxicity, were sporadically reported; however, hematological toxicity was significantly more common in a subgroup of patients with compromised liver function (p<0.007). CONCLUSION: This study has shown that Xeloda is a good monotherapy choice, with high response rate as first line therapy of metastatic CRC. Adverse events do not influence response. Liver dysfunction is a poor prognostic parameter. Therapy with Xeloda is convenient and relatively safe in patients with liver dysfunction, where administration of other cytotoxic agents is not possible.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T02:14:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-da70868540664f2795150181bdefc9ce
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0354-7310
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T02:14:14Z
publishDate 2002-01-01
publisher Institute of Oncology, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
record_format Article
series Archive of Oncology
spelling doaj.art-da70868540664f2795150181bdefc9ce2022-12-21T20:40:30ZengInstitute of Oncology, Sremska Kamenica, SerbiaArchive of Oncology0354-73102002-01-0110424925210.2298/AOO0204249KXeloda as first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer-our experienceKovčin VladimirJešić RadaKrivokapić Zoran V.Andrić ZoranPavlović AleksandraBACKGROUND: Results of phase III clinical studies comparing efficacy of Xeloda vs. standard 5-FU/FA protocols as first line therapy of metastatic colorectal carcinoma (MCRC), have shown better efficacy of Xeloda, with less toxic adverse effects, apart from handfoot syndrome. METHODS: From January 2000 to May 2001 the study enrolled 54 patients with MCRC, 38 males and 16 females, aged 30-78 years. All patients had metastatic diseases. In 33 the primary tumor was in colon, in 21 in rectum. All patients received Xeloda 2500 mg/m2/day in two daily doses, during 14 days followed by 7 days of pause. Dose intensity was 88,79% +/- 9,2. For efficacy evaluation the WHO criteria and tumor markers CEA and CA 19-9 were used. RESULTS: Overall response rate was 47%, with 13% complete responses, 34% partial responses 38% stable disease and 15% disease progression. No significant difference was found between patients with regard to localization of primary tumor (colon or rectum). There was no significant difference in response rate when compared 27 patients with adverse events of capecitabine ('hand and foot' syndrome and diarrhea) and those without them. Response rate in a subgroup of 21 evaluable (out of 29) patients with initial signs of liver dysfunction was worse (p<0.005) in comparison with patients with normal liver function. Most frequent adverse events were 'hand and foot' syndrome (52%) and diarrhea (24%), or both (14%). Other adverse events, up to grade 2 toxicity, were sporadically reported; however, hematological toxicity was significantly more common in a subgroup of patients with compromised liver function (p<0.007). CONCLUSION: This study has shown that Xeloda is a good monotherapy choice, with high response rate as first line therapy of metastatic CRC. Adverse events do not influence response. Liver dysfunction is a poor prognostic parameter. Therapy with Xeloda is convenient and relatively safe in patients with liver dysfunction, where administration of other cytotoxic agents is not possible.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0354-7310/2002/0354-73100204249K.pdfColorectal neoplasmsantimetabolitesantineoplasticcombined chemotherapy protocolsneoplasm metastasistreatment outcome
spellingShingle Kovčin Vladimir
Ješić Rada
Krivokapić Zoran V.
Andrić Zoran
Pavlović Aleksandra
Xeloda as first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer-our experience
Archive of Oncology
Colorectal neoplasms
antimetabolites
antineoplastic
combined chemotherapy protocols
neoplasm metastasis
treatment outcome
title Xeloda as first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer-our experience
title_full Xeloda as first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer-our experience
title_fullStr Xeloda as first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer-our experience
title_full_unstemmed Xeloda as first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer-our experience
title_short Xeloda as first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer-our experience
title_sort xeloda as first line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer our experience
topic Colorectal neoplasms
antimetabolites
antineoplastic
combined chemotherapy protocols
neoplasm metastasis
treatment outcome
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0354-7310/2002/0354-73100204249K.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kovcinvladimir xelodaasfirstlinetherapyofmetastaticcolorectalcancerourexperience
AT jesicrada xelodaasfirstlinetherapyofmetastaticcolorectalcancerourexperience
AT krivokapiczoranv xelodaasfirstlinetherapyofmetastaticcolorectalcancerourexperience
AT andriczoran xelodaasfirstlinetherapyofmetastaticcolorectalcancerourexperience
AT pavlovicaleksandra xelodaasfirstlinetherapyofmetastaticcolorectalcancerourexperience