Policy relevant results from an expert elicitation on the health risks of phthalates
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The EU 6th Framework Program (FP)-funded Health and Environment Network (HENVINET) aimed to support informed policy making by facilitating the availability of relevant knowledge on different environmental health issues. An approach w...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2012-06-01
|
| Series: | Environmental Health |
| _version_ | 1818789782810001408 |
|---|---|
| author | Zimmer Karin Gutleb Arno Ravnum Solveig Krayer von Krauss Martin Murk Albertinka J Ropstad Erik Skaare Janneche Eriksen Gunnar Lyche Jan Koppe Janna G Magnanti Brooke L Yang Aileen Bartonova Alena Keune Hans |
| author_facet | Zimmer Karin Gutleb Arno Ravnum Solveig Krayer von Krauss Martin Murk Albertinka J Ropstad Erik Skaare Janneche Eriksen Gunnar Lyche Jan Koppe Janna G Magnanti Brooke L Yang Aileen Bartonova Alena Keune Hans |
| author_sort | Zimmer Karin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The EU 6th Framework Program (FP)-funded Health and Environment Network (HENVINET) aimed to support informed policy making by facilitating the availability of relevant knowledge on different environmental health issues. An approach was developed by which scientific agreement, disagreement, and knowledge gaps could be efficiently identified, and expert advice prepared in a way that is usable for policy makers. There were two aims of the project: 1) to apply the tool to a relevant issue; the potential health impacts of the widely used plasticizers, phthalates, and 2) to evaluate the method and the tool by asking both scientific experts and the target audience, namely policy makers and stakeholders, for their opinions.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The tool consisted of an expert consultation in several steps on the issue of phthalates in environmental health. A diagram depicting the cause-effect chain, from the production and use of phthalates to potential health impacts, was prepared based on existing reviews. This was used as a basis for an online questionnaire, through which experts in the field were consulted. The results of this first round of consultation laid the foundation for a new questionnaire answered by an expert panel that, subsequently, also discussed approaches and results in a workshop. One major task of the expert panel was to pinpoint priorities from the cause-effect chain according to their impact on the extent of potential health risks and their relevance for reducing uncertainty. The results were condensed into a policy brief that was sent to policy makers and stakeholders for their evaluation.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The experts agreed about the substantial knowledge gaps within the field of phthalates. The top three priorities for further research and policy action were: 1) intrauterine exposure, 2) reproductive toxicology, and 3) exposure from medical devices. Although not all relevant information from the cause-effect chain is known for phthalates, most experts thought that there are enough indications to justify a precautionary approach and to restrict their general use. Although some of the experts expressed some scepticism about such a tool, most felt that important issues were highlighted.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The approach used was an efficient way at summarising priority knowledge gaps as a starting point for health risk assessment of compounds, based on their relevance for the risk assessment outcome. We conclude that this approach is useful for supporting policy makers with state-of-the-art scientific knowledge weighed by experts. The method can assist future evidence-based policy making.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-18T14:45:02Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-da70fcc669174d619934fa069121587b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1476-069X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-18T14:45:02Z |
| publishDate | 2012-06-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Environmental Health |
| spelling | doaj.art-da70fcc669174d619934fa069121587b2022-12-21T21:04:17ZengBMCEnvironmental Health1476-069X2012-06-0111Suppl 1S610.1186/1476-069X-11-S1-S6Policy relevant results from an expert elicitation on the health risks of phthalatesZimmer KarinGutleb ArnoRavnum SolveigKrayer von Krauss MartinMurk Albertinka JRopstad ErikSkaare JannecheEriksen GunnarLyche JanKoppe Janna GMagnanti Brooke LYang AileenBartonova AlenaKeune Hans<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The EU 6th Framework Program (FP)-funded Health and Environment Network (HENVINET) aimed to support informed policy making by facilitating the availability of relevant knowledge on different environmental health issues. An approach was developed by which scientific agreement, disagreement, and knowledge gaps could be efficiently identified, and expert advice prepared in a way that is usable for policy makers. There were two aims of the project: 1) to apply the tool to a relevant issue; the potential health impacts of the widely used plasticizers, phthalates, and 2) to evaluate the method and the tool by asking both scientific experts and the target audience, namely policy makers and stakeholders, for their opinions.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The tool consisted of an expert consultation in several steps on the issue of phthalates in environmental health. A diagram depicting the cause-effect chain, from the production and use of phthalates to potential health impacts, was prepared based on existing reviews. This was used as a basis for an online questionnaire, through which experts in the field were consulted. The results of this first round of consultation laid the foundation for a new questionnaire answered by an expert panel that, subsequently, also discussed approaches and results in a workshop. One major task of the expert panel was to pinpoint priorities from the cause-effect chain according to their impact on the extent of potential health risks and their relevance for reducing uncertainty. The results were condensed into a policy brief that was sent to policy makers and stakeholders for their evaluation.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The experts agreed about the substantial knowledge gaps within the field of phthalates. The top three priorities for further research and policy action were: 1) intrauterine exposure, 2) reproductive toxicology, and 3) exposure from medical devices. Although not all relevant information from the cause-effect chain is known for phthalates, most experts thought that there are enough indications to justify a precautionary approach and to restrict their general use. Although some of the experts expressed some scepticism about such a tool, most felt that important issues were highlighted.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The approach used was an efficient way at summarising priority knowledge gaps as a starting point for health risk assessment of compounds, based on their relevance for the risk assessment outcome. We conclude that this approach is useful for supporting policy makers with state-of-the-art scientific knowledge weighed by experts. The method can assist future evidence-based policy making.</p> |
| spellingShingle | Zimmer Karin Gutleb Arno Ravnum Solveig Krayer von Krauss Martin Murk Albertinka J Ropstad Erik Skaare Janneche Eriksen Gunnar Lyche Jan Koppe Janna G Magnanti Brooke L Yang Aileen Bartonova Alena Keune Hans Policy relevant results from an expert elicitation on the health risks of phthalates Environmental Health |
| title | Policy relevant results from an expert elicitation on the health risks of phthalates |
| title_full | Policy relevant results from an expert elicitation on the health risks of phthalates |
| title_fullStr | Policy relevant results from an expert elicitation on the health risks of phthalates |
| title_full_unstemmed | Policy relevant results from an expert elicitation on the health risks of phthalates |
| title_short | Policy relevant results from an expert elicitation on the health risks of phthalates |
| title_sort | policy relevant results from an expert elicitation on the health risks of phthalates |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zimmerkarin policyrelevantresultsfromanexpertelicitationonthehealthrisksofphthalates AT gutlebarno policyrelevantresultsfromanexpertelicitationonthehealthrisksofphthalates AT ravnumsolveig policyrelevantresultsfromanexpertelicitationonthehealthrisksofphthalates AT krayervonkraussmartin policyrelevantresultsfromanexpertelicitationonthehealthrisksofphthalates AT murkalbertinkaj policyrelevantresultsfromanexpertelicitationonthehealthrisksofphthalates AT ropstaderik policyrelevantresultsfromanexpertelicitationonthehealthrisksofphthalates AT skaarejanneche policyrelevantresultsfromanexpertelicitationonthehealthrisksofphthalates AT eriksengunnar policyrelevantresultsfromanexpertelicitationonthehealthrisksofphthalates AT lychejan policyrelevantresultsfromanexpertelicitationonthehealthrisksofphthalates AT koppejannag policyrelevantresultsfromanexpertelicitationonthehealthrisksofphthalates AT magnantibrookel policyrelevantresultsfromanexpertelicitationonthehealthrisksofphthalates AT yangaileen policyrelevantresultsfromanexpertelicitationonthehealthrisksofphthalates AT bartonovaalena policyrelevantresultsfromanexpertelicitationonthehealthrisksofphthalates AT keunehans policyrelevantresultsfromanexpertelicitationonthehealthrisksofphthalates |