Quality of care in patients with community acquired pneumonia and sepsis in a Swiss hospital

QUESTIONS UNDER STUDY: Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and sepsis are leading causes of hospitalisation after admission to a medical emergency department (ED). Identifying these potentially life-threatening diseases is not always easy due to often unspecific or minimal symptoms. However, qu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Corinne C. Widmer, Esther B Bachli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW) 2012-01-01
Series:Swiss Medical Weekly
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/1419
_version_ 1811194122960109568
author Corinne C. Widmer
Esther B Bachli
author_facet Corinne C. Widmer
Esther B Bachli
author_sort Corinne C. Widmer
collection DOAJ
description QUESTIONS UNDER STUDY: Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and sepsis are leading causes of hospitalisation after admission to a medical emergency department (ED). Identifying these potentially life-threatening diseases is not always easy due to often unspecific or minimal symptoms. However, quick application of antibiotics is known to be crucial and is correlated with better outcome. The international guidelines of the joint commission suggest a 4 hour-rule for optimal quality of care in CAP and sepsis. In this study we assessed the door-to-needle time (DNT) in patients admitted to our ED with the diagnosis of CAP and/or sepsis. Furthermore we investigated the CRB-65 score, its clinical performance and its influence on DNT. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of all patients admitted and hospitalised through the ED of a Swiss hospital with the diagnosis of sepsis or pneumonia from June 2009 to June 2010 (n = 139). RESULTS: In 73% of the cases DNT was lower than the recommended 4 hours. In CAP, a correlation between the CRB-65 and DNT was not found (ρ = 0.13, p = 0.30). Further parameters, e.g. temperature or blood pressure did not improve DNT significantly. Analysis of the CRB-65 score was regularly impeded due to absent documented information on respiratory rate or confusion state. CONCLUSION: In most cases it was feasible to fulfill the 4 hours DNT. The CRB-65 score is an easy bedside tool, which was not routinely assessed by our emergency room personnel but its assessment did not affect DNT in our hospital.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T00:20:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-da76e7bda9314b6abe16389f347bdae7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-3997
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T00:20:41Z
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher SMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW)
record_format Article
series Swiss Medical Weekly
spelling doaj.art-da76e7bda9314b6abe16389f347bdae72022-12-22T03:55:44ZengSMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW)Swiss Medical Weekly1424-39972012-01-01142050610.4414/smw.2012.13510Quality of care in patients with community acquired pneumonia and sepsis in a Swiss hospitalCorinne C. WidmerEsther B Bachli QUESTIONS UNDER STUDY: Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and sepsis are leading causes of hospitalisation after admission to a medical emergency department (ED). Identifying these potentially life-threatening diseases is not always easy due to often unspecific or minimal symptoms. However, quick application of antibiotics is known to be crucial and is correlated with better outcome. The international guidelines of the joint commission suggest a 4 hour-rule for optimal quality of care in CAP and sepsis. In this study we assessed the door-to-needle time (DNT) in patients admitted to our ED with the diagnosis of CAP and/or sepsis. Furthermore we investigated the CRB-65 score, its clinical performance and its influence on DNT. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of all patients admitted and hospitalised through the ED of a Swiss hospital with the diagnosis of sepsis or pneumonia from June 2009 to June 2010 (n = 139). RESULTS: In 73% of the cases DNT was lower than the recommended 4 hours. In CAP, a correlation between the CRB-65 and DNT was not found (ρ = 0.13, p = 0.30). Further parameters, e.g. temperature or blood pressure did not improve DNT significantly. Analysis of the CRB-65 score was regularly impeded due to absent documented information on respiratory rate or confusion state. CONCLUSION: In most cases it was feasible to fulfill the 4 hours DNT. The CRB-65 score is an easy bedside tool, which was not routinely assessed by our emergency room personnel but its assessment did not affect DNT in our hospital. https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/1419CRB-65door-to-needle timequality control
spellingShingle Corinne C. Widmer
Esther B Bachli
Quality of care in patients with community acquired pneumonia and sepsis in a Swiss hospital
Swiss Medical Weekly
CRB-65
door-to-needle time
quality control
title Quality of care in patients with community acquired pneumonia and sepsis in a Swiss hospital
title_full Quality of care in patients with community acquired pneumonia and sepsis in a Swiss hospital
title_fullStr Quality of care in patients with community acquired pneumonia and sepsis in a Swiss hospital
title_full_unstemmed Quality of care in patients with community acquired pneumonia and sepsis in a Swiss hospital
title_short Quality of care in patients with community acquired pneumonia and sepsis in a Swiss hospital
title_sort quality of care in patients with community acquired pneumonia and sepsis in a swiss hospital
topic CRB-65
door-to-needle time
quality control
url https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/1419
work_keys_str_mv AT corinnecwidmer qualityofcareinpatientswithcommunityacquiredpneumoniaandsepsisinaswisshospital
AT estherbbachli qualityofcareinpatientswithcommunityacquiredpneumoniaandsepsisinaswisshospital