The apples and oranges of reference and potential evapotranspiration: Implications for agroecosystem models
Abstract Although standardized evapotranspiration (ET) methods have been available for decades, they are commonly misunderstood, miscommunicated, and misused, especially within the agroecosystem modeling community. Some models misapply or misname standardized ET methods unbeknownst to users, and the...
Main Authors: | Kendall C. DeJonge, Kelly R. Thorp, Gary W. Marek |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Agricultural & Environmental Letters |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20011 |
Similar Items
-
Version 1.2.0 — pyfao56: FAO-56 evapotranspiration in Python
by: Kelly R. Thorp, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01) -
Version 1.1.0—pyfao56: FAO-56 evapotranspiration in Python
by: Josh Brekel, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01) -
Evapotranspiration Cycles in a High Latitude Agroecosystem: Potential Warming Role.
by: Watcharee Ruairuen, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Evapotranspiration: Potential or Reference?
by: Suat Irmak, et al.
Published: (2003-08-01) -
pyfao56: FAO-56 evapotranspiration in Python
by: Kelly R. Thorp
Published: (2022-07-01)