Femoral nerve block versus adductor canal block for postoperative pain control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized controlled double blind study

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the postoperative pain control using adductor canal block (ACB) compared that using the femoral nerve block (FNB) in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLR). Materials and methods: One hundred and twen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohamed Sayed El Ahl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2015-01-01
Series:Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2015;volume=9;issue=3;spage=279;epage=282;aulast=El
_version_ 1811199470821441536
author Mohamed Sayed El Ahl
author_facet Mohamed Sayed El Ahl
author_sort Mohamed Sayed El Ahl
collection DOAJ
description Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the postoperative pain control using adductor canal block (ACB) compared that using the femoral nerve block (FNB) in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLR). Materials and methods: One hundred and twenty-eight patients who had been scheduled to patellar graft ACLR were included in this double blind study, and were randomly allocated into two groups; group ACB and group FNB (64 patients each). All patients received general anesthesia. At the end of the surgery, patients in group FNB received a FNB and those in group ACB received an ACB. The postoperative pain (visual analog scale [VAS]) and muscle weakness were assessed in the postoperative care unit and every 6 h thereafter for 24 h. The total morphine requirements were also recorded. Results: Patients in group ACB had significantly higher VAS (at 18 h and 24 h), higher morphine consumption, but significantly less quadriceps weakness than those in group FNB. Conclusion: In patients with patellar graft ACLR, the ACB can maintain a higher quadriceps power, but with lesser analgesia compared with the FNB.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T01:48:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-da78ce4de0c24a2cac12dd4b32631d53
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1658-354X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T01:48:49Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
spelling doaj.art-da78ce4de0c24a2cac12dd4b32631d532022-12-22T03:53:00ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsSaudi Journal of Anaesthesia1658-354X2015-01-019327928210.4103/1658-354X.154708Femoral nerve block versus adductor canal block for postoperative pain control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized controlled double blind studyMohamed Sayed El AhlBackground: The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the postoperative pain control using adductor canal block (ACB) compared that using the femoral nerve block (FNB) in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLR). Materials and methods: One hundred and twenty-eight patients who had been scheduled to patellar graft ACLR were included in this double blind study, and were randomly allocated into two groups; group ACB and group FNB (64 patients each). All patients received general anesthesia. At the end of the surgery, patients in group FNB received a FNB and those in group ACB received an ACB. The postoperative pain (visual analog scale [VAS]) and muscle weakness were assessed in the postoperative care unit and every 6 h thereafter for 24 h. The total morphine requirements were also recorded. Results: Patients in group ACB had significantly higher VAS (at 18 h and 24 h), higher morphine consumption, but significantly less quadriceps weakness than those in group FNB. Conclusion: In patients with patellar graft ACLR, the ACB can maintain a higher quadriceps power, but with lesser analgesia compared with the FNB.http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2015;volume=9;issue=3;spage=279;epage=282;aulast=ElAnesthetic techniquesanesthetics localequipmentfemoralregionalropivacaineultrasound machines
spellingShingle Mohamed Sayed El Ahl
Femoral nerve block versus adductor canal block for postoperative pain control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized controlled double blind study
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
Anesthetic techniques
anesthetics local
equipment
femoral
regional
ropivacaine
ultrasound machines
title Femoral nerve block versus adductor canal block for postoperative pain control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized controlled double blind study
title_full Femoral nerve block versus adductor canal block for postoperative pain control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized controlled double blind study
title_fullStr Femoral nerve block versus adductor canal block for postoperative pain control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized controlled double blind study
title_full_unstemmed Femoral nerve block versus adductor canal block for postoperative pain control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized controlled double blind study
title_short Femoral nerve block versus adductor canal block for postoperative pain control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized controlled double blind study
title_sort femoral nerve block versus adductor canal block for postoperative pain control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a randomized controlled double blind study
topic Anesthetic techniques
anesthetics local
equipment
femoral
regional
ropivacaine
ultrasound machines
url http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2015;volume=9;issue=3;spage=279;epage=282;aulast=El
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedsayedelahl femoralnerveblockversusadductorcanalblockforpostoperativepaincontrolafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindstudy