Evaluating the repetitive mucus extraction effects on mucus biomarkers, mucous cells, and the skin-barrier status in a marine fish model

Among all the mucosal barriers, the skin and its surrounding mucus are possibly the main defensive tool against changes in the environment that can be harmful for fish. Due to the extraction of this mucus being less invasive, the study of its production and functions has attracted great interest in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ignasi Sanahuja, Pedro M. Guerreiro, Albert Girons, Laura Fernandez-Alacid, Antoni Ibarz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Marine Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.1095246/full
_version_ 1797950585490636800
author Ignasi Sanahuja
Ignasi Sanahuja
Pedro M. Guerreiro
Albert Girons
Laura Fernandez-Alacid
Antoni Ibarz
author_facet Ignasi Sanahuja
Ignasi Sanahuja
Pedro M. Guerreiro
Albert Girons
Laura Fernandez-Alacid
Antoni Ibarz
author_sort Ignasi Sanahuja
collection DOAJ
description Among all the mucosal barriers, the skin and its surrounding mucus are possibly the main defensive tool against changes in the environment that can be harmful for fish. Due to the extraction of this mucus being less invasive, the study of its production and functions has attracted great interest in recent years. However, there are still many gaps concerning the sampling process as well as the possible alterations in skin integrity and mucus composition. In the current study, the effects of skin mucus extraction were determined by comparing the effects of a single extraction (single extraction group, SEG) with those of three successive extractions separated by 3 days (repetitive extractions group, REG). Intact skin histology without mucus extraction (ØEG) and both plasma and skin mucus biomarkers and antibacterial capacities were also assessed. Regarding the skin histology and skin barrier properties, both the SEG and REG did not show differences in the intact skin. Interestingly, repetitive mucus extractions seemed to activate skin mucus turnover, significantly increasing the number of small-sized mucous cells (cell area< 100 µm2) and reducing the number of large-sized mucous cells (cell area > 150 µm2). Repetitive extractions significantly decreased the amounts of soluble protein and increased cortisol secretion. These metabolites remained unaltered in the plasma, indicating different responses in the plasma and mucus. Despite changes in the mucus biomarkers, antibacterial capacity against pathogenic bacteria (Pseudomonas anguilliseptica and Vibrio anguillarum) was maintained in both the plasma and mucus irrespective of the number of mucus extractions. Overall, the mucus sampling protocol had little effect on skin integrity and mucus antibacterial properties, only modifying the amounts of soluble protein exuded and stimulating mucous cell replacement. This protocol is a feasible and minimally invasive way of studying and monitoring fish health and welfare and can be used as an alternative or a complement to plasma analysis. This methodology can be transferred to farm culture conditions and be very useful for studying threatened species in order to preserve fish welfare.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T22:18:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-da7f672df038493d9898929c69e88c0f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-7745
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T22:18:03Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Marine Science
spelling doaj.art-da7f672df038493d9898929c69e88c0f2023-01-18T07:12:06ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Marine Science2296-77452023-01-01910.3389/fmars.2022.10952461095246Evaluating the repetitive mucus extraction effects on mucus biomarkers, mucous cells, and the skin-barrier status in a marine fish modelIgnasi Sanahuja0Ignasi Sanahuja1Pedro M. Guerreiro2Albert Girons3Laura Fernandez-Alacid4Antoni Ibarz5IRTA-Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology, Aquaculture Program, La Ràpita, SpainCell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, SpainCCMAR-Center for Marine Sciences, University of Algarve, Faro, PortugalICTIOVET S.L., Barcelona, SpainCell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, SpainCell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, SpainAmong all the mucosal barriers, the skin and its surrounding mucus are possibly the main defensive tool against changes in the environment that can be harmful for fish. Due to the extraction of this mucus being less invasive, the study of its production and functions has attracted great interest in recent years. However, there are still many gaps concerning the sampling process as well as the possible alterations in skin integrity and mucus composition. In the current study, the effects of skin mucus extraction were determined by comparing the effects of a single extraction (single extraction group, SEG) with those of three successive extractions separated by 3 days (repetitive extractions group, REG). Intact skin histology without mucus extraction (ØEG) and both plasma and skin mucus biomarkers and antibacterial capacities were also assessed. Regarding the skin histology and skin barrier properties, both the SEG and REG did not show differences in the intact skin. Interestingly, repetitive mucus extractions seemed to activate skin mucus turnover, significantly increasing the number of small-sized mucous cells (cell area< 100 µm2) and reducing the number of large-sized mucous cells (cell area > 150 µm2). Repetitive extractions significantly decreased the amounts of soluble protein and increased cortisol secretion. These metabolites remained unaltered in the plasma, indicating different responses in the plasma and mucus. Despite changes in the mucus biomarkers, antibacterial capacity against pathogenic bacteria (Pseudomonas anguilliseptica and Vibrio anguillarum) was maintained in both the plasma and mucus irrespective of the number of mucus extractions. Overall, the mucus sampling protocol had little effect on skin integrity and mucus antibacterial properties, only modifying the amounts of soluble protein exuded and stimulating mucous cell replacement. This protocol is a feasible and minimally invasive way of studying and monitoring fish health and welfare and can be used as an alternative or a complement to plasma analysis. This methodology can be transferred to farm culture conditions and be very useful for studying threatened species in order to preserve fish welfare.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.1095246/fullantibacterial activityskin mucus-associated biomarkers (SMABs)mucous cellsmucus barriermarine fish
spellingShingle Ignasi Sanahuja
Ignasi Sanahuja
Pedro M. Guerreiro
Albert Girons
Laura Fernandez-Alacid
Antoni Ibarz
Evaluating the repetitive mucus extraction effects on mucus biomarkers, mucous cells, and the skin-barrier status in a marine fish model
Frontiers in Marine Science
antibacterial activity
skin mucus-associated biomarkers (SMABs)
mucous cells
mucus barrier
marine fish
title Evaluating the repetitive mucus extraction effects on mucus biomarkers, mucous cells, and the skin-barrier status in a marine fish model
title_full Evaluating the repetitive mucus extraction effects on mucus biomarkers, mucous cells, and the skin-barrier status in a marine fish model
title_fullStr Evaluating the repetitive mucus extraction effects on mucus biomarkers, mucous cells, and the skin-barrier status in a marine fish model
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the repetitive mucus extraction effects on mucus biomarkers, mucous cells, and the skin-barrier status in a marine fish model
title_short Evaluating the repetitive mucus extraction effects on mucus biomarkers, mucous cells, and the skin-barrier status in a marine fish model
title_sort evaluating the repetitive mucus extraction effects on mucus biomarkers mucous cells and the skin barrier status in a marine fish model
topic antibacterial activity
skin mucus-associated biomarkers (SMABs)
mucous cells
mucus barrier
marine fish
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.1095246/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ignasisanahuja evaluatingtherepetitivemucusextractioneffectsonmucusbiomarkersmucouscellsandtheskinbarrierstatusinamarinefishmodel
AT ignasisanahuja evaluatingtherepetitivemucusextractioneffectsonmucusbiomarkersmucouscellsandtheskinbarrierstatusinamarinefishmodel
AT pedromguerreiro evaluatingtherepetitivemucusextractioneffectsonmucusbiomarkersmucouscellsandtheskinbarrierstatusinamarinefishmodel
AT albertgirons evaluatingtherepetitivemucusextractioneffectsonmucusbiomarkersmucouscellsandtheskinbarrierstatusinamarinefishmodel
AT laurafernandezalacid evaluatingtherepetitivemucusextractioneffectsonmucusbiomarkersmucouscellsandtheskinbarrierstatusinamarinefishmodel
AT antoniibarz evaluatingtherepetitivemucusextractioneffectsonmucusbiomarkersmucouscellsandtheskinbarrierstatusinamarinefishmodel