Rethinking the basic conservation unit and associated protocol for augmentation of an "endangered" caribou population: An opinion

Use of the subspecies as the basic unit in the conservation of endangered caribou (Rangifer tarandus) would produce a “melting pot” end-product that would mask important genotypic, phenotypic, ecological, and behavioral variations found below the level of the subspecies. Therefore, we examined optio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frank L. Miller, Samuel J. Barry, Wendy A. Calvert, Keri A. Zittlau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Septentrio Academic Publishing 2007-04-01
Series:Rangifer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/314
_version_ 1818389614919942144
author Frank L. Miller
Samuel J. Barry
Wendy A. Calvert
Keri A. Zittlau
author_facet Frank L. Miller
Samuel J. Barry
Wendy A. Calvert
Keri A. Zittlau
author_sort Frank L. Miller
collection DOAJ
description Use of the subspecies as the basic unit in the conservation of endangered caribou (Rangifer tarandus) would produce a “melting pot” end-product that would mask important genotypic, phenotypic, ecological, and behavioral variations found below the level of the subspecies. Therefore, we examined options for establishing the basic conservation unit for an endangered caribou population: use of subspecies based on taxonomy, subspecies based solely on mtDNA, Evolutionarily Significant Units, and the geographic population. We reject the first three and conclude that the only feasible basic unit for biologically and ecologically sound conservation of endangered caribou in North America is the geographic population. Conservation of endangered caribou at the level of the geographic population is necessary to identify and maintain current biodiversity. As deliberations about endangered caribou conservation often involve consideration of population augmentation, we also discuss the appropriate augmentation protocol for conserving biodiversity. Management of a critically endangered caribou population by augmentation should only be initiated after adequate study and evaluation of the genotype, phenotype, ecology, and behavior for both the endangered caribou and the potential‘donor’ caribou to prevent the possible ‘contamination’ of the endangered caribou. Translocation of caribou into an endangered population will have failed, even if the restocking efforts succeed, if the donor animals functionally alter the population’s gene pool or phenotype, or alter the ecological and behavioral adaptations of individuals in the endangered population. Most importantly, a seriously flawed restocking would risk irreversibly altering those functional characteristics of caribou in an endangered population that make them distinct and possibly unique. It might even result in the loss of the endangered population, thus eliminating a uniquely evolved line from among the caribou species.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T04:44:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-da86561ea7c64ad48ad44330d46ab3c9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1890-6729
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T04:44:32Z
publishDate 2007-04-01
publisher Septentrio Academic Publishing
record_format Article
series Rangifer
spelling doaj.art-da86561ea7c64ad48ad44330d46ab3c92022-12-21T23:16:43ZengSeptentrio Academic PublishingRangifer1890-67292007-04-0127410.7557/2.27.4.314288Rethinking the basic conservation unit and associated protocol for augmentation of an "endangered" caribou population: An opinionFrank L. Miller0Samuel J. Barry1Wendy A. Calvert2Keri A. Zittlau3Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Prairie & Northern Region, Room 200, 4999 – 98th Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T6B 2X3, CanadaCanadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Prairie & Northern Region, Room 200, 4999 – 98th Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T6B 2X3, CanadaCanadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Prairie & Northern Region, Room 200, 4999 – 98th Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T6B 2X3, CanadaDivision of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Rocky Mountain College, 1511 Poly Drive, Billings, Montana, 59102, USAUse of the subspecies as the basic unit in the conservation of endangered caribou (Rangifer tarandus) would produce a “melting pot” end-product that would mask important genotypic, phenotypic, ecological, and behavioral variations found below the level of the subspecies. Therefore, we examined options for establishing the basic conservation unit for an endangered caribou population: use of subspecies based on taxonomy, subspecies based solely on mtDNA, Evolutionarily Significant Units, and the geographic population. We reject the first three and conclude that the only feasible basic unit for biologically and ecologically sound conservation of endangered caribou in North America is the geographic population. Conservation of endangered caribou at the level of the geographic population is necessary to identify and maintain current biodiversity. As deliberations about endangered caribou conservation often involve consideration of population augmentation, we also discuss the appropriate augmentation protocol for conserving biodiversity. Management of a critically endangered caribou population by augmentation should only be initiated after adequate study and evaluation of the genotype, phenotype, ecology, and behavior for both the endangered caribou and the potential‘donor’ caribou to prevent the possible ‘contamination’ of the endangered caribou. Translocation of caribou into an endangered population will have failed, even if the restocking efforts succeed, if the donor animals functionally alter the population’s gene pool or phenotype, or alter the ecological and behavioral adaptations of individuals in the endangered population. Most importantly, a seriously flawed restocking would risk irreversibly altering those functional characteristics of caribou in an endangered population that make them distinct and possibly unique. It might even result in the loss of the endangered population, thus eliminating a uniquely evolved line from among the caribou species.https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/314augmentationbehaviourecologygenotypegeographic populationphenotype
spellingShingle Frank L. Miller
Samuel J. Barry
Wendy A. Calvert
Keri A. Zittlau
Rethinking the basic conservation unit and associated protocol for augmentation of an "endangered" caribou population: An opinion
Rangifer
augmentation
behaviour
ecology
genotype
geographic population
phenotype
title Rethinking the basic conservation unit and associated protocol for augmentation of an "endangered" caribou population: An opinion
title_full Rethinking the basic conservation unit and associated protocol for augmentation of an "endangered" caribou population: An opinion
title_fullStr Rethinking the basic conservation unit and associated protocol for augmentation of an "endangered" caribou population: An opinion
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking the basic conservation unit and associated protocol for augmentation of an "endangered" caribou population: An opinion
title_short Rethinking the basic conservation unit and associated protocol for augmentation of an "endangered" caribou population: An opinion
title_sort rethinking the basic conservation unit and associated protocol for augmentation of an endangered caribou population an opinion
topic augmentation
behaviour
ecology
genotype
geographic population
phenotype
url https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/rangifer/article/view/314
work_keys_str_mv AT franklmiller rethinkingthebasicconservationunitandassociatedprotocolforaugmentationofanendangeredcariboupopulationanopinion
AT samueljbarry rethinkingthebasicconservationunitandassociatedprotocolforaugmentationofanendangeredcariboupopulationanopinion
AT wendyacalvert rethinkingthebasicconservationunitandassociatedprotocolforaugmentationofanendangeredcariboupopulationanopinion
AT keriazittlau rethinkingthebasicconservationunitandassociatedprotocolforaugmentationofanendangeredcariboupopulationanopinion