The Security Gap in Syria: Individual and Collective Security in ‘Rebel-held’ Territories

This paper examines security in Syria through the conceptual lens of the security gap, understood as the gap between security practices and objectives which have implications for individual and collective security. Practices of security can be the state apparatus, the military, and militias. The obj...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ali Abdul Kadir Ali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centre for Security Governance 2015-07-01
Series:Stability : International Journal of Security and Development
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.stabilityjournal.org/articles/310
_version_ 1819136061418242048
author Ali Abdul Kadir Ali
author_facet Ali Abdul Kadir Ali
author_sort Ali Abdul Kadir Ali
collection DOAJ
description This paper examines security in Syria through the conceptual lens of the security gap, understood as the gap between security practices and objectives which have implications for individual and collective security. Practices of security can be the state apparatus, the military, and militias. The objective – safety – can refer to the safety or security of a range of collectives including the state, political parties, and ethnic groups, while individual security refers to the general safety of inhabitants and the protection of human rights. This paper compares the security situation in so-called ‘rebel-held’ areas of Syria where alternative governance structures have emerged, examining the security approaches of Local Administrative Councils and Rebel Councils in Deir Azzor, Manbij, Dera, and areas dominated by the Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PYD). It argues that security and safety are strongly influenced by authority formation and the nature of deals and relationships involved in the formation of these nascent authorities. It also argues that security in these areas is strongly influenced by the Syrian government, which disrupts collectives that threaten its own collective security while giving limited support to those which serve its agenda of retaining power. It also demonstrates the limited utility of the ‘regime’ vs. ‘rebel-held’ dichotomy, as rebel groups at times must accommodate the Syrian state in limited ways for instrumental purposes. The article is based on fieldwork conducted in Turkey in 2013–2014, interviews conducted in 2015, and secondary sources based on field research.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T10:28:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-da8e50f494cc4f0fa126cf0fc5025a69
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2165-2627
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T10:28:59Z
publishDate 2015-07-01
publisher Centre for Security Governance
record_format Article
series Stability : International Journal of Security and Development
spelling doaj.art-da8e50f494cc4f0fa126cf0fc5025a692022-12-21T18:29:23ZengCentre for Security GovernanceStability : International Journal of Security and Development2165-26272015-07-014110.5334/sta.gd170The Security Gap in Syria: Individual and Collective Security in ‘Rebel-held’ TerritoriesAli Abdul Kadir Ali0London School of EconomicsThis paper examines security in Syria through the conceptual lens of the security gap, understood as the gap between security practices and objectives which have implications for individual and collective security. Practices of security can be the state apparatus, the military, and militias. The objective – safety – can refer to the safety or security of a range of collectives including the state, political parties, and ethnic groups, while individual security refers to the general safety of inhabitants and the protection of human rights. This paper compares the security situation in so-called ‘rebel-held’ areas of Syria where alternative governance structures have emerged, examining the security approaches of Local Administrative Councils and Rebel Councils in Deir Azzor, Manbij, Dera, and areas dominated by the Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PYD). It argues that security and safety are strongly influenced by authority formation and the nature of deals and relationships involved in the formation of these nascent authorities. It also argues that security in these areas is strongly influenced by the Syrian government, which disrupts collectives that threaten its own collective security while giving limited support to those which serve its agenda of retaining power. It also demonstrates the limited utility of the ‘regime’ vs. ‘rebel-held’ dichotomy, as rebel groups at times must accommodate the Syrian state in limited ways for instrumental purposes. The article is based on fieldwork conducted in Turkey in 2013–2014, interviews conducted in 2015, and secondary sources based on field research.http://www.stabilityjournal.org/articles/310SyriaLocal Administrative CouncilsKurds of SyriaPYDUngoverned Spaces
spellingShingle Ali Abdul Kadir Ali
The Security Gap in Syria: Individual and Collective Security in ‘Rebel-held’ Territories
Stability : International Journal of Security and Development
Syria
Local Administrative Councils
Kurds of Syria
PYD
Ungoverned Spaces
title The Security Gap in Syria: Individual and Collective Security in ‘Rebel-held’ Territories
title_full The Security Gap in Syria: Individual and Collective Security in ‘Rebel-held’ Territories
title_fullStr The Security Gap in Syria: Individual and Collective Security in ‘Rebel-held’ Territories
title_full_unstemmed The Security Gap in Syria: Individual and Collective Security in ‘Rebel-held’ Territories
title_short The Security Gap in Syria: Individual and Collective Security in ‘Rebel-held’ Territories
title_sort security gap in syria individual and collective security in rebel held territories
topic Syria
Local Administrative Councils
Kurds of Syria
PYD
Ungoverned Spaces
url http://www.stabilityjournal.org/articles/310
work_keys_str_mv AT aliabdulkadirali thesecuritygapinsyriaindividualandcollectivesecurityinrebelheldterritories
AT aliabdulkadirali securitygapinsyriaindividualandcollectivesecurityinrebelheldterritories