Brain Protection in Patients with Aortic Dissection and Coronary Artery Disease

The aim. To compare the effectiveness of methods of protecting the brain and visceral organs during operations for aortic aneurysms combined with coronary artery lesions. Materials and methods. In the period from 2012 to 2020, 23 patients with Stanford type A and non-A non-B aortic dissection wit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ihor I. Zhekov, Vitalii I. Kravchenko, Oleh I. Sarhosh, Genadii A. Zinchenko, Anatoliy V. Rudenko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Professional Edition Eastern Europe 2022-09-01
Series:Український журнал серцево-судинної хірургії
Subjects:
Online Access:http://cvs.org.ua/index.php/ujcvs/article/view/512
_version_ 1797997654999826432
author Ihor I. Zhekov
Vitalii I. Kravchenko
Oleh I. Sarhosh
Genadii A. Zinchenko
Anatoliy V. Rudenko
author_facet Ihor I. Zhekov
Vitalii I. Kravchenko
Oleh I. Sarhosh
Genadii A. Zinchenko
Anatoliy V. Rudenko
author_sort Ihor I. Zhekov
collection DOAJ
description The aim. To compare the effectiveness of methods of protecting the brain and visceral organs during operations for aortic aneurysms combined with coronary artery lesions. Materials and methods. In the period from 2012 to 2020, 23 patients with Stanford type A and non-A non-B aortic dissection with damage to the coronary arteries were operated at the National Amosov Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery of the NAMS of Ukraine using the brain protection techniques. Out of 23 surgical interventions, 16 were performed for Stanford type A acute aortic dissection, 3 for Stanford type A chronic aortic dissection, 1 for Stanford type A subacute aortic dissection, and 3 for Stanford non-A non-B aortic dissection. The main causes of aortic dissection were hypertension (16 patients), Marfan syndrome (3 patients), bicuspid aortic valve (4 patients). Results. The most threatening postoperative complication in this group of patients is neurological damage, which was observed in 4 (17%) patients after surgery, with gradual recovery of brain function. Also, the complications observed were respiratory failure in 3 (13%) patients, which required long-term artificial ventilation (more than 72 hours), and multiple organ failure in 1 (4.3%) patient, which caused a fatal outcome.Complications such as kidney and liver failure were not observed (most likely due to the small sample size). Heart failure was not noted as well. Hospital mortality was 4.3% (1 fatal case). In our study, among the entire group of operated patients, symptoms of neurological damage occurred in 4 (17.4%) patients, hemorrhagic stroke was present in 1 (4.3%) patient with a complicated medical history, 2 (8.6%) patients had hemiparesis and in 1 case (4.3%) there were cognitive disorders. Conclusions. Comparing brain protection techniques, taking into account the prolongation of aortic clamping time due to coronary artery shunting compared to isolated aortic dissection, it can be concluded that longer duration of selective brain perfusion (retrograde or antegrade) or duration of circulatory arrest more often lead to postoperative complications, namely neurological lesions. On the other hand, the small number of observations does not make it possible to fully assess the impact of each of the techniques. Further follow-up with a larger sample will provide opportunities for a more complete evaluation of brain protection techniques in operations for dissecting aortic aneurysms and coronary artery lesions.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T10:35:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-da91611e81764ddf9fd2420f60393e3b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2664-5963
2664-5971
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T10:35:03Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Professional Edition Eastern Europe
record_format Article
series Український журнал серцево-судинної хірургії
spelling doaj.art-da91611e81764ddf9fd2420f60393e3b2022-12-22T04:29:18ZengProfessional Edition Eastern EuropeУкраїнський журнал серцево-судинної хірургії2664-59632664-59712022-09-01303939710.30702/ujcvs/22.30(03)/ZhK038-9397512Brain Protection in Patients with Aortic Dissection and Coronary Artery DiseaseIhor I. Zhekov0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9785-7777Vitalii I. Kravchenko1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4873-5367Oleh I. Sarhosh2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1525-038XGenadii A. Zinchenko3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8542-0394Anatoliy V. Rudenko4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1099-1613National Amosov Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, UkraineNational Amosov Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, UkraineNational Amosov Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, UkraineNational Amosov Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, UkraineNational Amosov Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, UkraineThe aim. To compare the effectiveness of methods of protecting the brain and visceral organs during operations for aortic aneurysms combined with coronary artery lesions. Materials and methods. In the period from 2012 to 2020, 23 patients with Stanford type A and non-A non-B aortic dissection with damage to the coronary arteries were operated at the National Amosov Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery of the NAMS of Ukraine using the brain protection techniques. Out of 23 surgical interventions, 16 were performed for Stanford type A acute aortic dissection, 3 for Stanford type A chronic aortic dissection, 1 for Stanford type A subacute aortic dissection, and 3 for Stanford non-A non-B aortic dissection. The main causes of aortic dissection were hypertension (16 patients), Marfan syndrome (3 patients), bicuspid aortic valve (4 patients). Results. The most threatening postoperative complication in this group of patients is neurological damage, which was observed in 4 (17%) patients after surgery, with gradual recovery of brain function. Also, the complications observed were respiratory failure in 3 (13%) patients, which required long-term artificial ventilation (more than 72 hours), and multiple organ failure in 1 (4.3%) patient, which caused a fatal outcome.Complications such as kidney and liver failure were not observed (most likely due to the small sample size). Heart failure was not noted as well. Hospital mortality was 4.3% (1 fatal case). In our study, among the entire group of operated patients, symptoms of neurological damage occurred in 4 (17.4%) patients, hemorrhagic stroke was present in 1 (4.3%) patient with a complicated medical history, 2 (8.6%) patients had hemiparesis and in 1 case (4.3%) there were cognitive disorders. Conclusions. Comparing brain protection techniques, taking into account the prolongation of aortic clamping time due to coronary artery shunting compared to isolated aortic dissection, it can be concluded that longer duration of selective brain perfusion (retrograde or antegrade) or duration of circulatory arrest more often lead to postoperative complications, namely neurological lesions. On the other hand, the small number of observations does not make it possible to fully assess the impact of each of the techniques. Further follow-up with a larger sample will provide opportunities for a more complete evaluation of brain protection techniques in operations for dissecting aortic aneurysms and coronary artery lesions.http://cvs.org.ua/index.php/ujcvs/article/view/512aortic aneurysmacute dissecting aortic aneurysmcoronary artery bypass graftingcoronary heart diseasecerebral ischemiaaortic archprotection of the myocardium
spellingShingle Ihor I. Zhekov
Vitalii I. Kravchenko
Oleh I. Sarhosh
Genadii A. Zinchenko
Anatoliy V. Rudenko
Brain Protection in Patients with Aortic Dissection and Coronary Artery Disease
Український журнал серцево-судинної хірургії
aortic aneurysm
acute dissecting aortic aneurysm
coronary artery bypass grafting
coronary heart disease
cerebral ischemia
aortic arch
protection of the myocardium
title Brain Protection in Patients with Aortic Dissection and Coronary Artery Disease
title_full Brain Protection in Patients with Aortic Dissection and Coronary Artery Disease
title_fullStr Brain Protection in Patients with Aortic Dissection and Coronary Artery Disease
title_full_unstemmed Brain Protection in Patients with Aortic Dissection and Coronary Artery Disease
title_short Brain Protection in Patients with Aortic Dissection and Coronary Artery Disease
title_sort brain protection in patients with aortic dissection and coronary artery disease
topic aortic aneurysm
acute dissecting aortic aneurysm
coronary artery bypass grafting
coronary heart disease
cerebral ischemia
aortic arch
protection of the myocardium
url http://cvs.org.ua/index.php/ujcvs/article/view/512
work_keys_str_mv AT ihorizhekov brainprotectioninpatientswithaorticdissectionandcoronaryarterydisease
AT vitaliiikravchenko brainprotectioninpatientswithaorticdissectionandcoronaryarterydisease
AT olehisarhosh brainprotectioninpatientswithaorticdissectionandcoronaryarterydisease
AT genadiiazinchenko brainprotectioninpatientswithaorticdissectionandcoronaryarterydisease
AT anatoliyvrudenko brainprotectioninpatientswithaorticdissectionandcoronaryarterydisease