Metadiscourse Markers: Frequency and Errors Made by EFL Students
To present a skillfully written abstract, an author should apply some strategies. One of them is the application of Metadiscourse Markers, which provides readers with linguistic features that will help them quickly get the gist of the entire research. Studies have examined the metadiscourse markers...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
2022-07-01
|
Series: | Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/FTL/article/view/14403 |
_version_ | 1811195714480373760 |
---|---|
author | Junaity Soften Sine Rosdiana Mata |
author_facet | Junaity Soften Sine Rosdiana Mata |
author_sort | Junaity Soften Sine |
collection | DOAJ |
description | To present a skillfully written abstract, an author should apply some strategies. One of them is the application of Metadiscourse Markers, which provides readers with linguistic features that will help them quickly get the gist of the entire research. Studies have examined the metadiscourse markers in abstracts of theses and published article journals written by Indonesian, but only a few used a corpus-based approach and analyzed the errors simultaneously. This study, therefore, aimed at finding the frequency of Metadiscourse Markers and grammatical errors made by Accounting Department students of Kupang State Polytechnic in their final papers’ abstracts. A corpus-based approach was applied by using AntConc Version 3.5.9 concordance tool. The study showed that interactive markers occurred more frequently than interactional resources. Moreover, grammatical errors were related to applying punctuation (comma), plural forms, verb tenses, and modality. This study suggests the teaching material includes the features of Metadiscourse Markers in abstract writing and further emphasizes the grammar on topics where students performed errors. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T00:48:39Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-dabec1134c364f3bbd534c5a2f3bd00b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2527-7650 2580-2070 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T00:48:39Z |
publishDate | 2022-07-01 |
publisher | Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning |
spelling | doaj.art-dabec1134c364f3bbd534c5a2f3bd00b2022-12-22T03:54:49ZengUniversitas Muhammadiyah YogyakartaJournal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning2527-76502580-20702022-07-017213815910.18196/ftl.v7i2.144036032Metadiscourse Markers: Frequency and Errors Made by EFL StudentsJunaity Soften Sine0Rosdiana Mata1Institut Agama Kristen Negeri KupangPoliteknik Negeri KupangTo present a skillfully written abstract, an author should apply some strategies. One of them is the application of Metadiscourse Markers, which provides readers with linguistic features that will help them quickly get the gist of the entire research. Studies have examined the metadiscourse markers in abstracts of theses and published article journals written by Indonesian, but only a few used a corpus-based approach and analyzed the errors simultaneously. This study, therefore, aimed at finding the frequency of Metadiscourse Markers and grammatical errors made by Accounting Department students of Kupang State Polytechnic in their final papers’ abstracts. A corpus-based approach was applied by using AntConc Version 3.5.9 concordance tool. The study showed that interactive markers occurred more frequently than interactional resources. Moreover, grammatical errors were related to applying punctuation (comma), plural forms, verb tenses, and modality. This study suggests the teaching material includes the features of Metadiscourse Markers in abstract writing and further emphasizes the grammar on topics where students performed errors.https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/FTL/article/view/14403metadiscourse markersinteractive markersinteractional markers |
spellingShingle | Junaity Soften Sine Rosdiana Mata Metadiscourse Markers: Frequency and Errors Made by EFL Students Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning metadiscourse markers interactive markers interactional markers |
title | Metadiscourse Markers: Frequency and Errors Made by EFL Students |
title_full | Metadiscourse Markers: Frequency and Errors Made by EFL Students |
title_fullStr | Metadiscourse Markers: Frequency and Errors Made by EFL Students |
title_full_unstemmed | Metadiscourse Markers: Frequency and Errors Made by EFL Students |
title_short | Metadiscourse Markers: Frequency and Errors Made by EFL Students |
title_sort | metadiscourse markers frequency and errors made by efl students |
topic | metadiscourse markers interactive markers interactional markers |
url | https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/FTL/article/view/14403 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT junaitysoftensine metadiscoursemarkersfrequencyanderrorsmadebyeflstudents AT rosdianamata metadiscoursemarkersfrequencyanderrorsmadebyeflstudents |