Subjectivity, historical imagination and the language of art history

Analysing the writings of Michael Baxandall, Michael Ann Holly, Adrian Stokes and T. J. Clark, and responding to recent art historiographical interest in the foregrounding of subjectivity, this essay deploys Baxandall’s analysis of the verbal description of visual interest to attend to subjectivity’...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thomas Hughes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Department of Art History, University of Birmingham 2020-12-01
Series:Journal of Art Historiography
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2020/11/hughes.pdf
_version_ 1818596725924823040
author Thomas Hughes
author_facet Thomas Hughes
author_sort Thomas Hughes
collection DOAJ
description Analysing the writings of Michael Baxandall, Michael Ann Holly, Adrian Stokes and T. J. Clark, and responding to recent art historiographical interest in the foregrounding of subjectivity, this essay deploys Baxandall’s analysis of the verbal description of visual interest to attend to subjectivity’s functioning in relationtothe object and its history. Revealing significant continuities between Baxandall and Clark, the essay traces a genealogy of writers who, in different ways, deploy subjectivity in the service of ethical commitments to painting. The essay proposes rethinking subjectivity in art-historical writing through an expanded notion of imagination.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T11:36:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dad0bed75ae54e729d56a74422a4a3bf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2042-4752
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T11:36:29Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Department of Art History, University of Birmingham
record_format Article
series Journal of Art Historiography
spelling doaj.art-dad0bed75ae54e729d56a74422a4a3bf2022-12-21T22:33:06ZengDepartment of Art History, University of BirminghamJournal of Art Historiography2042-47522020-12-012323TH1Subjectivity, historical imagination and the language of art historyThomas Hughes 0Courtauld InstituteAnalysing the writings of Michael Baxandall, Michael Ann Holly, Adrian Stokes and T. J. Clark, and responding to recent art historiographical interest in the foregrounding of subjectivity, this essay deploys Baxandall’s analysis of the verbal description of visual interest to attend to subjectivity’s functioning in relationtothe object and its history. Revealing significant continuities between Baxandall and Clark, the essay traces a genealogy of writers who, in different ways, deploy subjectivity in the service of ethical commitments to painting. The essay proposes rethinking subjectivity in art-historical writing through an expanded notion of imagination.https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2020/11/hughes.pdfsubjectivitylanguageart historymichael baxandallt. j. clarkearly modern paintingimagination
spellingShingle Thomas Hughes
Subjectivity, historical imagination and the language of art history
Journal of Art Historiography
subjectivity
language
art history
michael baxandall
t. j. clark
early modern painting
imagination
title Subjectivity, historical imagination and the language of art history
title_full Subjectivity, historical imagination and the language of art history
title_fullStr Subjectivity, historical imagination and the language of art history
title_full_unstemmed Subjectivity, historical imagination and the language of art history
title_short Subjectivity, historical imagination and the language of art history
title_sort subjectivity historical imagination and the language of art history
topic subjectivity
language
art history
michael baxandall
t. j. clark
early modern painting
imagination
url https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2020/11/hughes.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT thomashughes subjectivityhistoricalimaginationandthelanguageofarthistory