Validation of Scolioscan Air-Portable Radiation-Free Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging Assessment System for Scoliosis

To diagnose scoliosis, the standing radiograph with Cobb’s method is the gold standard for clinical practice. Recently, three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging, which is radiation-free and inexpensive, has been demonstrated to be reliable for the assessment of scoliosis and validated by several gr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kelly Ka-Lee Lai, Timothy Tin-Yan Lee, Michael Ka-Shing Lee, Joseph Chi-Ho Hui, Yong-Ping Zheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/8/2858
_version_ 1797537217401323520
author Kelly Ka-Lee Lai
Timothy Tin-Yan Lee
Michael Ka-Shing Lee
Joseph Chi-Ho Hui
Yong-Ping Zheng
author_facet Kelly Ka-Lee Lai
Timothy Tin-Yan Lee
Michael Ka-Shing Lee
Joseph Chi-Ho Hui
Yong-Ping Zheng
author_sort Kelly Ka-Lee Lai
collection DOAJ
description To diagnose scoliosis, the standing radiograph with Cobb’s method is the gold standard for clinical practice. Recently, three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging, which is radiation-free and inexpensive, has been demonstrated to be reliable for the assessment of scoliosis and validated by several groups. A portable 3D ultrasound system for scoliosis assessment is very much demanded, as it can further extend its potential applications for scoliosis screening, diagnosis, monitoring, treatment outcome measurement, and progress prediction. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of a newly developed portable 3D ultrasound imaging system, Scolioscan Air, for scoliosis assessment using coronal images it generated. The system was comprised of a handheld probe and tablet PC linking with a USB cable, and the probe further included a palm-sized ultrasound module together with a low-profile optical spatial sensor. A plastic phantom with three different angle structures built-in was used to evaluate the accuracy of measurement by positioning in 10 different orientations. Then, 19 volunteers with scoliosis (13F and 6M; Age: 13.6 ± 3.2 years) with different severity of scoliosis were assessed. Each subject underwent scanning by a commercially available 3D ultrasound imaging system, Scolioscan, and the portable 3D ultrasound imaging system, with the same posture on the same date. The spinal process angles (SPA) were measured in the coronal images formed by both systems and compared with each other. The angle phantom measurement showed the measured angles well agreed with the designed values, 59.7 ± 2.9 vs. 60 degrees, 40.8 ± 1.9 vs. 40 degrees, and 20.9 ± 2.1 vs. 20 degrees. For the subject tests, results demonstrated that there was a very good agreement between the angles obtained by the two systems, with a strong correlation (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.78) for the 29 curves measured. The absolute difference between the two data sets was 2.9 ± 1.8 degrees. In addition, there was a small mean difference of 1.2 degrees, and the differences were symmetrically distributed around the mean difference according to the Bland–Altman test. Scolioscan Air was sufficiently comparable to Scolioscan in scoliosis assessment, overcoming the space limitation of Scolioscan and thus providing wider applications. Further studies involving a larger number of subjects are worthwhile to demonstrate its potential clinical values for the management of scoliosis.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T12:12:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dae98469841f44d08fd903ae9f5877a7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T12:12:57Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-dae98469841f44d08fd903ae9f5877a72023-11-21T16:07:52ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202021-04-01218285810.3390/s21082858Validation of Scolioscan Air-Portable Radiation-Free Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging Assessment System for ScoliosisKelly Ka-Lee Lai0Timothy Tin-Yan Lee1Michael Ka-Shing Lee2Joseph Chi-Ho Hui3Yong-Ping Zheng4Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong KongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong KongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong KongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong KongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong KongTo diagnose scoliosis, the standing radiograph with Cobb’s method is the gold standard for clinical practice. Recently, three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging, which is radiation-free and inexpensive, has been demonstrated to be reliable for the assessment of scoliosis and validated by several groups. A portable 3D ultrasound system for scoliosis assessment is very much demanded, as it can further extend its potential applications for scoliosis screening, diagnosis, monitoring, treatment outcome measurement, and progress prediction. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of a newly developed portable 3D ultrasound imaging system, Scolioscan Air, for scoliosis assessment using coronal images it generated. The system was comprised of a handheld probe and tablet PC linking with a USB cable, and the probe further included a palm-sized ultrasound module together with a low-profile optical spatial sensor. A plastic phantom with three different angle structures built-in was used to evaluate the accuracy of measurement by positioning in 10 different orientations. Then, 19 volunteers with scoliosis (13F and 6M; Age: 13.6 ± 3.2 years) with different severity of scoliosis were assessed. Each subject underwent scanning by a commercially available 3D ultrasound imaging system, Scolioscan, and the portable 3D ultrasound imaging system, with the same posture on the same date. The spinal process angles (SPA) were measured in the coronal images formed by both systems and compared with each other. The angle phantom measurement showed the measured angles well agreed with the designed values, 59.7 ± 2.9 vs. 60 degrees, 40.8 ± 1.9 vs. 40 degrees, and 20.9 ± 2.1 vs. 20 degrees. For the subject tests, results demonstrated that there was a very good agreement between the angles obtained by the two systems, with a strong correlation (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.78) for the 29 curves measured. The absolute difference between the two data sets was 2.9 ± 1.8 degrees. In addition, there was a small mean difference of 1.2 degrees, and the differences were symmetrically distributed around the mean difference according to the Bland–Altman test. Scolioscan Air was sufficiently comparable to Scolioscan in scoliosis assessment, overcoming the space limitation of Scolioscan and thus providing wider applications. Further studies involving a larger number of subjects are worthwhile to demonstrate its potential clinical values for the management of scoliosis.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/8/2858scoliosis3D ultrasoundultrasound imagingportable 3D ultrasoundradiation-free
spellingShingle Kelly Ka-Lee Lai
Timothy Tin-Yan Lee
Michael Ka-Shing Lee
Joseph Chi-Ho Hui
Yong-Ping Zheng
Validation of Scolioscan Air-Portable Radiation-Free Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging Assessment System for Scoliosis
Sensors
scoliosis
3D ultrasound
ultrasound imaging
portable 3D ultrasound
radiation-free
title Validation of Scolioscan Air-Portable Radiation-Free Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging Assessment System for Scoliosis
title_full Validation of Scolioscan Air-Portable Radiation-Free Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging Assessment System for Scoliosis
title_fullStr Validation of Scolioscan Air-Portable Radiation-Free Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging Assessment System for Scoliosis
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Scolioscan Air-Portable Radiation-Free Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging Assessment System for Scoliosis
title_short Validation of Scolioscan Air-Portable Radiation-Free Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging Assessment System for Scoliosis
title_sort validation of scolioscan air portable radiation free three dimensional ultrasound imaging assessment system for scoliosis
topic scoliosis
3D ultrasound
ultrasound imaging
portable 3D ultrasound
radiation-free
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/8/2858
work_keys_str_mv AT kellykaleelai validationofscolioscanairportableradiationfreethreedimensionalultrasoundimagingassessmentsystemforscoliosis
AT timothytinyanlee validationofscolioscanairportableradiationfreethreedimensionalultrasoundimagingassessmentsystemforscoliosis
AT michaelkashinglee validationofscolioscanairportableradiationfreethreedimensionalultrasoundimagingassessmentsystemforscoliosis
AT josephchihohui validationofscolioscanairportableradiationfreethreedimensionalultrasoundimagingassessmentsystemforscoliosis
AT yongpingzheng validationofscolioscanairportableradiationfreethreedimensionalultrasoundimagingassessmentsystemforscoliosis