An efficient method for bearing fault diagnosis

Statistical features and wavelet based fault detection are attempted to find computationally less complex, low-memory, and power for real-time implementation. The mean absolute value (MAV), simple sign integral (SSI), waveform length (WL), slope sign change, and zero crossing are extracted from the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. Geetha, P. Geethanjali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2024-12-01
Series:Systems Science & Control Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/21642583.2024.2329264
_version_ 1797257251690381312
author G. Geetha
P. Geethanjali
author_facet G. Geetha
P. Geethanjali
author_sort G. Geetha
collection DOAJ
description Statistical features and wavelet based fault detection are attempted to find computationally less complex, low-memory, and power for real-time implementation. The mean absolute value (MAV), simple sign integral (SSI), waveform length (WL), slope sign change, and zero crossing are extracted from the vibration signal, phase current signal-1, and phase current signal-2. The extracted features are combined varyingly to obtain 31 combinations and classified using a decision tree, k-nearest neighbor {k-NN}, and support vector machine. The identified features {MAV, SSI, WL} performed better with vibration and combined current signals, with an average accuracy of 99.8% and 99.5% with the k-NN classifier, respectively. Wavelet has shown an accuracy of 98%, and the Alexnet method obtained an average accuracy of 97.5% using a combined current signal, which is less than the time domain features-based machine learning approach. In addition, simple time-domain features require memory of 9.6 MB times less than wavelets and 4.18MB times less than Alexnet. The time domain-based technique requires a computation time of 30.21 minutes less than Alexnet and 53.54 minutes less than wavelets. Experimentally, the effectiveness of identified minimal features is verified using an induction motor current signal and achieved 100% accuracy with {MAV, SSI, WL}.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T22:34:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-db0d03eee09f4db8b58c4b208e552ab8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2164-2583
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T22:34:40Z
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Systems Science & Control Engineering
spelling doaj.art-db0d03eee09f4db8b58c4b208e552ab82024-03-19T12:00:25ZengTaylor & Francis GroupSystems Science & Control Engineering2164-25832024-12-0112110.1080/21642583.2024.2329264An efficient method for bearing fault diagnosisG. Geetha0P. Geethanjali1School of Electrical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, IndiaSchool of Electrical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, IndiaStatistical features and wavelet based fault detection are attempted to find computationally less complex, low-memory, and power for real-time implementation. The mean absolute value (MAV), simple sign integral (SSI), waveform length (WL), slope sign change, and zero crossing are extracted from the vibration signal, phase current signal-1, and phase current signal-2. The extracted features are combined varyingly to obtain 31 combinations and classified using a decision tree, k-nearest neighbor {k-NN}, and support vector machine. The identified features {MAV, SSI, WL} performed better with vibration and combined current signals, with an average accuracy of 99.8% and 99.5% with the k-NN classifier, respectively. Wavelet has shown an accuracy of 98%, and the Alexnet method obtained an average accuracy of 97.5% using a combined current signal, which is less than the time domain features-based machine learning approach. In addition, simple time-domain features require memory of 9.6 MB times less than wavelets and 4.18MB times less than Alexnet. The time domain-based technique requires a computation time of 30.21 minutes less than Alexnet and 53.54 minutes less than wavelets. Experimentally, the effectiveness of identified minimal features is verified using an induction motor current signal and achieved 100% accuracy with {MAV, SSI, WL}.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/21642583.2024.2329264Bearing faultclassifierscurrent signalfeature combinationstatistical featuresdeep learning
spellingShingle G. Geetha
P. Geethanjali
An efficient method for bearing fault diagnosis
Systems Science & Control Engineering
Bearing fault
classifiers
current signal
feature combination
statistical features
deep learning
title An efficient method for bearing fault diagnosis
title_full An efficient method for bearing fault diagnosis
title_fullStr An efficient method for bearing fault diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed An efficient method for bearing fault diagnosis
title_short An efficient method for bearing fault diagnosis
title_sort efficient method for bearing fault diagnosis
topic Bearing fault
classifiers
current signal
feature combination
statistical features
deep learning
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/21642583.2024.2329264
work_keys_str_mv AT ggeetha anefficientmethodforbearingfaultdiagnosis
AT pgeethanjali anefficientmethodforbearingfaultdiagnosis
AT ggeetha efficientmethodforbearingfaultdiagnosis
AT pgeethanjali efficientmethodforbearingfaultdiagnosis