The History of Archaeology as a ‘Colonial Discourse’
During the greater part of the twentieth century, the history of archaeology promoted an idealized image of archaeological practice in colonized places. Historians usually omitted the political implications of archaeology and, in many instances, justified the appr...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2006-11-01
|
| Series: | Bulletin of the History of Archaeology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.archaeologybulletin.org/article/view/114 |
| Summary: | During the greater part of the twentieth century, the history of
archaeology promoted an idealized image of archaeological practice in colonized places.
Historians usually omitted the political implications of archaeology and, in many
instances, justified the appropriation of material culture from colonized places. In
this paper, I suggest that postcolonial studies, a field constituted during the 1980s
and 1990s, offers a useful framework in which to understand the relationships between
the history of archaeology and colonialism. Taking postcolonial theory as reference, I
define the history of archaeology written until the 1980s as a particular form of
‘colonial discourse’. I conclude by proposing some ways in which postcolonial theory can
inform the history of archaeology. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1062-4740 2047-6930 |