Locomotor adaptation to a powered ankle-foot orthosis depends on control method

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>We studied human locomotor adaptation to powered ankle-foot orthoses with the intent of identifying differences between two different orthosis control methods. The first orthosis control method used a footswitch to provide bang-bang...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gordon Keith E, Cain Stephen M, Ferris Daniel P
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2007-12-01
Series:Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Online Access:http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/4/1/48
_version_ 1818833021881548800
author Gordon Keith E
Cain Stephen M
Ferris Daniel P
author_facet Gordon Keith E
Cain Stephen M
Ferris Daniel P
author_sort Gordon Keith E
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>We studied human locomotor adaptation to powered ankle-foot orthoses with the intent of identifying differences between two different orthosis control methods. The first orthosis control method used a footswitch to provide bang-bang control (a kinematic control) and the second orthosis control method used a proportional myoelectric signal from the soleus (a physiological control). Both controllers activated an artificial pneumatic muscle providing plantar flexion torque.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Subjects walked on a treadmill for two thirty-minute sessions spaced three days apart under either footswitch control (n = 6) or myoelectric control (n = 6). We recorded lower limb electromyography (EMG), joint kinematics, and orthosis kinetics. We compared stance phase EMG amplitudes, correlation of joint angle patterns, and mechanical work performed by the powered orthosis between the two controllers over time.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>During steady state at the end of the second session, subjects using proportional myoelectric control had much lower soleus and gastrocnemius activation than the subjects using footswitch control. The substantial decrease in triceps surae recruitment allowed the proportional myoelectric control subjects to walk with ankle kinematics close to normal and reduce negative work performed by the orthosis. The footswitch control subjects walked with substantially perturbed ankle kinematics and performed more negative work with the orthosis.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>These results provide evidence that the choice of orthosis control method can greatly alter how humans adapt to powered orthosis assistance during walking. Specifically, proportional myoelectric control results in larger reductions in muscle activation and gait kinematics more similar to normal compared to footswitch control.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-19T02:12:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-db367658136247e5ba3193411c730275
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1743-0003
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T02:12:18Z
publishDate 2007-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
spelling doaj.art-db367658136247e5ba3193411c7302752022-12-21T20:40:41ZengBMCJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation1743-00032007-12-01414810.1186/1743-0003-4-48Locomotor adaptation to a powered ankle-foot orthosis depends on control methodGordon Keith ECain Stephen MFerris Daniel P<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>We studied human locomotor adaptation to powered ankle-foot orthoses with the intent of identifying differences between two different orthosis control methods. The first orthosis control method used a footswitch to provide bang-bang control (a kinematic control) and the second orthosis control method used a proportional myoelectric signal from the soleus (a physiological control). Both controllers activated an artificial pneumatic muscle providing plantar flexion torque.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Subjects walked on a treadmill for two thirty-minute sessions spaced three days apart under either footswitch control (n = 6) or myoelectric control (n = 6). We recorded lower limb electromyography (EMG), joint kinematics, and orthosis kinetics. We compared stance phase EMG amplitudes, correlation of joint angle patterns, and mechanical work performed by the powered orthosis between the two controllers over time.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>During steady state at the end of the second session, subjects using proportional myoelectric control had much lower soleus and gastrocnemius activation than the subjects using footswitch control. The substantial decrease in triceps surae recruitment allowed the proportional myoelectric control subjects to walk with ankle kinematics close to normal and reduce negative work performed by the orthosis. The footswitch control subjects walked with substantially perturbed ankle kinematics and performed more negative work with the orthosis.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>These results provide evidence that the choice of orthosis control method can greatly alter how humans adapt to powered orthosis assistance during walking. Specifically, proportional myoelectric control results in larger reductions in muscle activation and gait kinematics more similar to normal compared to footswitch control.</p>http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/4/1/48
spellingShingle Gordon Keith E
Cain Stephen M
Ferris Daniel P
Locomotor adaptation to a powered ankle-foot orthosis depends on control method
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
title Locomotor adaptation to a powered ankle-foot orthosis depends on control method
title_full Locomotor adaptation to a powered ankle-foot orthosis depends on control method
title_fullStr Locomotor adaptation to a powered ankle-foot orthosis depends on control method
title_full_unstemmed Locomotor adaptation to a powered ankle-foot orthosis depends on control method
title_short Locomotor adaptation to a powered ankle-foot orthosis depends on control method
title_sort locomotor adaptation to a powered ankle foot orthosis depends on control method
url http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/4/1/48
work_keys_str_mv AT gordonkeithe locomotoradaptationtoapoweredanklefootorthosisdependsoncontrolmethod
AT cainstephenm locomotoradaptationtoapoweredanklefootorthosisdependsoncontrolmethod
AT ferrisdanielp locomotoradaptationtoapoweredanklefootorthosisdependsoncontrolmethod