Failure to Rescue (FTR) and Pitfalls in the Management of Complex Enteric Fistulas (CEF): From Rescue Surgery to Rescue Strategy

Purpose: Complex enteric fistulas (CEF) represent general surgeons’ nightmare. This paper aims to explore the impact on failure-to-rescue (FTR) rate of a standardised and integrated surgical and critical care step-up approach. Methods: This was a retrospective observational cohort study. Patients tr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stefano Piero Bernardo Cioffi, Osvaldo Chiara, Luca Del Prete, Alessandro Bonomi, Michele Altomare, Andrea Spota, Roberto Bini, Stefania Cimbanassi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-02-01
Series:Journal of Personalized Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/12/2/292
_version_ 1797478869004976128
author Stefano Piero Bernardo Cioffi
Osvaldo Chiara
Luca Del Prete
Alessandro Bonomi
Michele Altomare
Andrea Spota
Roberto Bini
Stefania Cimbanassi
author_facet Stefano Piero Bernardo Cioffi
Osvaldo Chiara
Luca Del Prete
Alessandro Bonomi
Michele Altomare
Andrea Spota
Roberto Bini
Stefania Cimbanassi
author_sort Stefano Piero Bernardo Cioffi
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: Complex enteric fistulas (CEF) represent general surgeons’ nightmare. This paper aims to explore the impact on failure-to-rescue (FTR) rate of a standardised and integrated surgical and critical care step-up approach. Methods: This was a retrospective observational cohort study. Patients treated for CEF from 2009 to 2019 at Niguarda Hospital were included. Each patient was approached following a three-step approach: study phase, sepsis control and strategy definition phase, and surgical rescue phase. Results: Sixteen patients were treated for CEF. Seven fistulas were classified as complex entero-cutaneous (ECF) and nine as entero-atmospheric fistula (EAF). Median number of surgical procedures for fistula control before definitive surgical attempt was 11 (IQR 2–33.5). The median time from culprit surgery and the first access at Niguarda Hospital to definitive surgical attempt were 279 days (IQR 231–409) and 120 days (IQR 34–231), respectively. Median ICU LOS was 71 days (IQR 28–101), and effective hospital LOS was 117 days, (IQR 69.5–188.8). Three patients (18.75%) experienced spontaneous fistula closure after conversion to simple ECF, whereas 13 (81.25%) underwent definitive surgery for fistula takedown. Surgical rescue was possible in nine patients. Nine patients underwent multiple postoperative revision for surgical complications. Four patients failed to be rescued. Conclusion: An integrated step-up rescue strategy is crucial to standardise the approach to CEF and go beyond the basic surgical rescue procedure. The definition of FTR is dependent from the examined population. CEF patients are a unique cluster of emergency general surgery patients who may need a tailored definition of FTR considering the burden of postoperative events influencing their outcome.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T21:37:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-db389447d4404c07b0b718e37114cae5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4426
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T21:37:43Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Personalized Medicine
spelling doaj.art-db389447d4404c07b0b718e37114cae52023-11-23T20:41:08ZengMDPI AGJournal of Personalized Medicine2075-44262022-02-0112229210.3390/jpm12020292Failure to Rescue (FTR) and Pitfalls in the Management of Complex Enteric Fistulas (CEF): From Rescue Surgery to Rescue StrategyStefano Piero Bernardo Cioffi0Osvaldo Chiara1Luca Del Prete2Alessandro Bonomi3Michele Altomare4Andrea Spota5Roberto Bini6Stefania Cimbanassi7General Surgery and Trauma Team, ASST GOM Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milan, ItalyGeneral Surgery and Trauma Team, ASST GOM Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milan, ItalyGeneral and Liver Transplant Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, ItalyGeneral Surgery Residency Program, State University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, ItalyGeneral Surgery and Trauma Team, ASST GOM Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milan, ItalyGeneral Surgery and Trauma Team, ASST GOM Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milan, ItalyGeneral Surgery and Trauma Team, ASST GOM Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milan, ItalyGeneral Surgery and Trauma Team, ASST GOM Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milan, ItalyPurpose: Complex enteric fistulas (CEF) represent general surgeons’ nightmare. This paper aims to explore the impact on failure-to-rescue (FTR) rate of a standardised and integrated surgical and critical care step-up approach. Methods: This was a retrospective observational cohort study. Patients treated for CEF from 2009 to 2019 at Niguarda Hospital were included. Each patient was approached following a three-step approach: study phase, sepsis control and strategy definition phase, and surgical rescue phase. Results: Sixteen patients were treated for CEF. Seven fistulas were classified as complex entero-cutaneous (ECF) and nine as entero-atmospheric fistula (EAF). Median number of surgical procedures for fistula control before definitive surgical attempt was 11 (IQR 2–33.5). The median time from culprit surgery and the first access at Niguarda Hospital to definitive surgical attempt were 279 days (IQR 231–409) and 120 days (IQR 34–231), respectively. Median ICU LOS was 71 days (IQR 28–101), and effective hospital LOS was 117 days, (IQR 69.5–188.8). Three patients (18.75%) experienced spontaneous fistula closure after conversion to simple ECF, whereas 13 (81.25%) underwent definitive surgery for fistula takedown. Surgical rescue was possible in nine patients. Nine patients underwent multiple postoperative revision for surgical complications. Four patients failed to be rescued. Conclusion: An integrated step-up rescue strategy is crucial to standardise the approach to CEF and go beyond the basic surgical rescue procedure. The definition of FTR is dependent from the examined population. CEF patients are a unique cluster of emergency general surgery patients who may need a tailored definition of FTR considering the burden of postoperative events influencing their outcome.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/12/2/292complex enteric fistulasrescue surgeryrescue strategyfailure to rescuegeneral emergency surgeryintegrated management
spellingShingle Stefano Piero Bernardo Cioffi
Osvaldo Chiara
Luca Del Prete
Alessandro Bonomi
Michele Altomare
Andrea Spota
Roberto Bini
Stefania Cimbanassi
Failure to Rescue (FTR) and Pitfalls in the Management of Complex Enteric Fistulas (CEF): From Rescue Surgery to Rescue Strategy
Journal of Personalized Medicine
complex enteric fistulas
rescue surgery
rescue strategy
failure to rescue
general emergency surgery
integrated management
title Failure to Rescue (FTR) and Pitfalls in the Management of Complex Enteric Fistulas (CEF): From Rescue Surgery to Rescue Strategy
title_full Failure to Rescue (FTR) and Pitfalls in the Management of Complex Enteric Fistulas (CEF): From Rescue Surgery to Rescue Strategy
title_fullStr Failure to Rescue (FTR) and Pitfalls in the Management of Complex Enteric Fistulas (CEF): From Rescue Surgery to Rescue Strategy
title_full_unstemmed Failure to Rescue (FTR) and Pitfalls in the Management of Complex Enteric Fistulas (CEF): From Rescue Surgery to Rescue Strategy
title_short Failure to Rescue (FTR) and Pitfalls in the Management of Complex Enteric Fistulas (CEF): From Rescue Surgery to Rescue Strategy
title_sort failure to rescue ftr and pitfalls in the management of complex enteric fistulas cef from rescue surgery to rescue strategy
topic complex enteric fistulas
rescue surgery
rescue strategy
failure to rescue
general emergency surgery
integrated management
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/12/2/292
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanopierobernardocioffi failuretorescueftrandpitfallsinthemanagementofcomplexentericfistulasceffromrescuesurgerytorescuestrategy
AT osvaldochiara failuretorescueftrandpitfallsinthemanagementofcomplexentericfistulasceffromrescuesurgerytorescuestrategy
AT lucadelprete failuretorescueftrandpitfallsinthemanagementofcomplexentericfistulasceffromrescuesurgerytorescuestrategy
AT alessandrobonomi failuretorescueftrandpitfallsinthemanagementofcomplexentericfistulasceffromrescuesurgerytorescuestrategy
AT michelealtomare failuretorescueftrandpitfallsinthemanagementofcomplexentericfistulasceffromrescuesurgerytorescuestrategy
AT andreaspota failuretorescueftrandpitfallsinthemanagementofcomplexentericfistulasceffromrescuesurgerytorescuestrategy
AT robertobini failuretorescueftrandpitfallsinthemanagementofcomplexentericfistulasceffromrescuesurgerytorescuestrategy
AT stefaniacimbanassi failuretorescueftrandpitfallsinthemanagementofcomplexentericfistulasceffromrescuesurgerytorescuestrategy