Screw tightness and stripping rates vary between biomechanical researchers and practicing orthopaedic surgeons
Abstract Background Screws are the most frequently inserted orthopaedic implants. Biomechanical, laboratory-based studies are used to provide a controlled environment to investigate revolutionary and evolutionary improvements in orthopaedic techniques. Predominantly, biomechanical trained, non-surgi...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2021-10-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02800-z |
| _version_ | 1798043395597271040 |
|---|---|
| author | James W. A. Fletcher Verena Neumann Lisa Wenzel Boyko Gueorguiev R. Geoff Richards Harinderjit S. Gill Michael R. Whitehouse Ezio Preatoni |
| author_facet | James W. A. Fletcher Verena Neumann Lisa Wenzel Boyko Gueorguiev R. Geoff Richards Harinderjit S. Gill Michael R. Whitehouse Ezio Preatoni |
| author_sort | James W. A. Fletcher |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Screws are the most frequently inserted orthopaedic implants. Biomechanical, laboratory-based studies are used to provide a controlled environment to investigate revolutionary and evolutionary improvements in orthopaedic techniques. Predominantly, biomechanical trained, non-surgically practicing researchers perform these studies, whilst it will be orthopaedic surgeons who will put these procedures into practice on patients. Limited data exist on the comparative performance of surgically and non-surgically trained biomechanical researchers when inserting screws. Furthermore, any variation in performance by surgeons and/or biomechanical researchers may create an underappreciated confounder to biomechanical research findings. This study aimed to identify the differences between surgically and non-surgically trained biomechanical researchers’ achieved screw tightness and stripping rates with different fixation methods. Methods Ten orthopaedic surgeons and 10 researchers inserted 60 cortical screws each into artificial bone, for three different screw diameters (2.7, 3.5 and 4.5 mm), with 50% of screws inserted through plates and 50% through washers. Screw tightness, screw hole stripping rates and confidence in screw purchase were recorded. Three members of each group also inserted 30 screws using an augmented screwdriver, which indicated when optimum tightness was achieved. Results Unstripped screw tightness for orthopaedic surgeons and researchers was 82% (n = 928, 95% CI 81–83) and 76% (n = 1470, 95% CI 75–76) respectively (p < 0.001); surgeons stripped 48% (872/1800) of inserted screws and researchers 18% (330/1800). Using washers was associated with increased tightness [80% (95% CI 80–81), n = 1196] compared to screws inserted through plates [76% (95% CI 75–77), n = 1204] (p < 0.001). Researchers were more accurate in their overall assessment of good screw insertion (86% vs. 62%). No learning effect occurred when comparing screw tightness for the first 10 insertions against the last 10 insertions for any condition (p = 0.058–0.821). Augmented screwdrivers, indicating optimum tightness, reduced stripping rates from 34 to 21% (p < 0.001). Experience was not associated with improved performance in screw tightness or stripping rates for either group (p = 0.385–0.965). Conclusions Surgeons and researchers showed different screw tightness under the same in vitro conditions, with greater rates of screw hole stripping by surgeons. This may have important implications for the reproducibility and transferability of research findings from different settings depending on who undertakes the experiments. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T22:48:28Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-db412a3d993046c98c2a16e0af3ae050 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1749-799X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T22:48:28Z |
| publishDate | 2021-10-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-db412a3d993046c98c2a16e0af3ae0502022-12-22T03:58:41ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2021-10-011611910.1186/s13018-021-02800-zScrew tightness and stripping rates vary between biomechanical researchers and practicing orthopaedic surgeonsJames W. A. Fletcher0Verena Neumann1Lisa Wenzel2Boyko Gueorguiev3R. Geoff Richards4Harinderjit S. Gill5Michael R. Whitehouse6Ezio Preatoni7Applied Biomechanics Suite, Department for Health, University of BathAO Research Institute DavosAO Research Institute DavosAO Research Institute DavosAO Research Institute DavosDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of BathMusculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Southmead HospitalApplied Biomechanics Suite, Department for Health, University of BathAbstract Background Screws are the most frequently inserted orthopaedic implants. Biomechanical, laboratory-based studies are used to provide a controlled environment to investigate revolutionary and evolutionary improvements in orthopaedic techniques. Predominantly, biomechanical trained, non-surgically practicing researchers perform these studies, whilst it will be orthopaedic surgeons who will put these procedures into practice on patients. Limited data exist on the comparative performance of surgically and non-surgically trained biomechanical researchers when inserting screws. Furthermore, any variation in performance by surgeons and/or biomechanical researchers may create an underappreciated confounder to biomechanical research findings. This study aimed to identify the differences between surgically and non-surgically trained biomechanical researchers’ achieved screw tightness and stripping rates with different fixation methods. Methods Ten orthopaedic surgeons and 10 researchers inserted 60 cortical screws each into artificial bone, for three different screw diameters (2.7, 3.5 and 4.5 mm), with 50% of screws inserted through plates and 50% through washers. Screw tightness, screw hole stripping rates and confidence in screw purchase were recorded. Three members of each group also inserted 30 screws using an augmented screwdriver, which indicated when optimum tightness was achieved. Results Unstripped screw tightness for orthopaedic surgeons and researchers was 82% (n = 928, 95% CI 81–83) and 76% (n = 1470, 95% CI 75–76) respectively (p < 0.001); surgeons stripped 48% (872/1800) of inserted screws and researchers 18% (330/1800). Using washers was associated with increased tightness [80% (95% CI 80–81), n = 1196] compared to screws inserted through plates [76% (95% CI 75–77), n = 1204] (p < 0.001). Researchers were more accurate in their overall assessment of good screw insertion (86% vs. 62%). No learning effect occurred when comparing screw tightness for the first 10 insertions against the last 10 insertions for any condition (p = 0.058–0.821). Augmented screwdrivers, indicating optimum tightness, reduced stripping rates from 34 to 21% (p < 0.001). Experience was not associated with improved performance in screw tightness or stripping rates for either group (p = 0.385–0.965). Conclusions Surgeons and researchers showed different screw tightness under the same in vitro conditions, with greater rates of screw hole stripping by surgeons. This may have important implications for the reproducibility and transferability of research findings from different settings depending on who undertakes the experiments.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02800-zResearcherScrewStripping rateSurgeonTightnessTorque |
| spellingShingle | James W. A. Fletcher Verena Neumann Lisa Wenzel Boyko Gueorguiev R. Geoff Richards Harinderjit S. Gill Michael R. Whitehouse Ezio Preatoni Screw tightness and stripping rates vary between biomechanical researchers and practicing orthopaedic surgeons Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research Researcher Screw Stripping rate Surgeon Tightness Torque |
| title | Screw tightness and stripping rates vary between biomechanical researchers and practicing orthopaedic surgeons |
| title_full | Screw tightness and stripping rates vary between biomechanical researchers and practicing orthopaedic surgeons |
| title_fullStr | Screw tightness and stripping rates vary between biomechanical researchers and practicing orthopaedic surgeons |
| title_full_unstemmed | Screw tightness and stripping rates vary between biomechanical researchers and practicing orthopaedic surgeons |
| title_short | Screw tightness and stripping rates vary between biomechanical researchers and practicing orthopaedic surgeons |
| title_sort | screw tightness and stripping rates vary between biomechanical researchers and practicing orthopaedic surgeons |
| topic | Researcher Screw Stripping rate Surgeon Tightness Torque |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02800-z |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jameswafletcher screwtightnessandstrippingratesvarybetweenbiomechanicalresearchersandpracticingorthopaedicsurgeons AT verenaneumann screwtightnessandstrippingratesvarybetweenbiomechanicalresearchersandpracticingorthopaedicsurgeons AT lisawenzel screwtightnessandstrippingratesvarybetweenbiomechanicalresearchersandpracticingorthopaedicsurgeons AT boykogueorguiev screwtightnessandstrippingratesvarybetweenbiomechanicalresearchersandpracticingorthopaedicsurgeons AT rgeoffrichards screwtightnessandstrippingratesvarybetweenbiomechanicalresearchersandpracticingorthopaedicsurgeons AT harinderjitsgill screwtightnessandstrippingratesvarybetweenbiomechanicalresearchersandpracticingorthopaedicsurgeons AT michaelrwhitehouse screwtightnessandstrippingratesvarybetweenbiomechanicalresearchersandpracticingorthopaedicsurgeons AT eziopreatoni screwtightnessandstrippingratesvarybetweenbiomechanicalresearchersandpracticingorthopaedicsurgeons |