Rhizospheric Microbiome Responses to Cover Crop Suppression Methods

Although winter cover crops (WCCs) have demonstrated positive effects on soil properties, relatively little is known about the responses of the soil and plant microbiomes to the introduction of WCCs and their associated management. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of WCC suppression methods...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marianela E. Morales, Marco Allegrini, Gastón A. Iocoli, Jessica Basualdo, María B. Villamil, María C. Zabaloy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-09-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/10/2246
_version_ 1827652471224270848
author Marianela E. Morales
Marco Allegrini
Gastón A. Iocoli
Jessica Basualdo
María B. Villamil
María C. Zabaloy
author_facet Marianela E. Morales
Marco Allegrini
Gastón A. Iocoli
Jessica Basualdo
María B. Villamil
María C. Zabaloy
author_sort Marianela E. Morales
collection DOAJ
description Although winter cover crops (WCCs) have demonstrated positive effects on soil properties, relatively little is known about the responses of the soil and plant microbiomes to the introduction of WCCs and their associated management. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of WCC suppression methods on the rhizosphere microbiome of oats under field conditions. Rhizospheric soil was extracted to quantify the abundances of <i>amoA</i> gene of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea, and nitrite reductase genes (<i>nirK</i> and <i>nirS</i>), and to determine potential nitrification activity. The bacterial 16S rRNA V4 region and fungal ITS regions were sequenced with the Illumina MiSeq system. Overall, our results indicated that the composition of the bacterial and fungal communities of the rhizosphere were sensitive to the WCC suppression methods. Some bacterial genera, including fungal antagonists and chitin degraders, and two fungi associated with plant potential pathogens, were favored by both suppression methods, yet both methods negatively affected other genera associated with plant growth promotion characteristics. Our work contributes to a more complete understanding of the interactions between WCC management practices, soil properties, and microbial communities in the rhizosphere, which is essential for choosing management strategies that maintain soil health and promote environmental sustainability.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T20:54:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-db53f00dd3da4bd29a3ab8002b5b6043
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4395
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T20:54:56Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agronomy
spelling doaj.art-db53f00dd3da4bd29a3ab8002b5b60432023-11-23T22:23:43ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952022-09-011210224610.3390/agronomy12102246Rhizospheric Microbiome Responses to Cover Crop Suppression MethodsMarianela E. Morales0Marco Allegrini1Gastón A. Iocoli2Jessica Basualdo3María B. Villamil4María C. Zabaloy5Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida (CERZOS), Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca 8000, ArgentinaCentro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida (CERZOS), Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca 8000, ArgentinaDepartamento de Agronomía, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca 8000, ArgentinaDepartamento de Agronomía, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca 8000, ArgentinaDepartment of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USACentro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida (CERZOS), Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca 8000, ArgentinaAlthough winter cover crops (WCCs) have demonstrated positive effects on soil properties, relatively little is known about the responses of the soil and plant microbiomes to the introduction of WCCs and their associated management. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of WCC suppression methods on the rhizosphere microbiome of oats under field conditions. Rhizospheric soil was extracted to quantify the abundances of <i>amoA</i> gene of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea, and nitrite reductase genes (<i>nirK</i> and <i>nirS</i>), and to determine potential nitrification activity. The bacterial 16S rRNA V4 region and fungal ITS regions were sequenced with the Illumina MiSeq system. Overall, our results indicated that the composition of the bacterial and fungal communities of the rhizosphere were sensitive to the WCC suppression methods. Some bacterial genera, including fungal antagonists and chitin degraders, and two fungi associated with plant potential pathogens, were favored by both suppression methods, yet both methods negatively affected other genera associated with plant growth promotion characteristics. Our work contributes to a more complete understanding of the interactions between WCC management practices, soil properties, and microbial communities in the rhizosphere, which is essential for choosing management strategies that maintain soil health and promote environmental sustainability.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/10/2246oatsglyphosateroller-crimperrhizospheric soilfungibacteria
spellingShingle Marianela E. Morales
Marco Allegrini
Gastón A. Iocoli
Jessica Basualdo
María B. Villamil
María C. Zabaloy
Rhizospheric Microbiome Responses to Cover Crop Suppression Methods
Agronomy
oats
glyphosate
roller-crimper
rhizospheric soil
fungi
bacteria
title Rhizospheric Microbiome Responses to Cover Crop Suppression Methods
title_full Rhizospheric Microbiome Responses to Cover Crop Suppression Methods
title_fullStr Rhizospheric Microbiome Responses to Cover Crop Suppression Methods
title_full_unstemmed Rhizospheric Microbiome Responses to Cover Crop Suppression Methods
title_short Rhizospheric Microbiome Responses to Cover Crop Suppression Methods
title_sort rhizospheric microbiome responses to cover crop suppression methods
topic oats
glyphosate
roller-crimper
rhizospheric soil
fungi
bacteria
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/10/2246
work_keys_str_mv AT marianelaemorales rhizosphericmicrobiomeresponsestocovercropsuppressionmethods
AT marcoallegrini rhizosphericmicrobiomeresponsestocovercropsuppressionmethods
AT gastonaiocoli rhizosphericmicrobiomeresponsestocovercropsuppressionmethods
AT jessicabasualdo rhizosphericmicrobiomeresponsestocovercropsuppressionmethods
AT mariabvillamil rhizosphericmicrobiomeresponsestocovercropsuppressionmethods
AT mariaczabaloy rhizosphericmicrobiomeresponsestocovercropsuppressionmethods