Technical efficacy and local recurrence after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of 2653 liver tumors: a 15-year single-center experience with evaluation of prognostic factors
Purpose To assess the technical outcome and local tumor control of multi-probe stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) in a large series of patients. Furthermore, to determine factors accounting for adverse outcomes.Material and methods Between 2003 and 2018, 865 patients were treated by SRFA fo...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2022-12-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Hyperthermia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/02656736.2022.2044522 |
_version_ | 1818488016594796544 |
---|---|
author | Peter Schullian Gregor Laimer Edward Johnston Daniel Putzer Gernot Eberle Yannick Scharll Gerlig Widmann Christian Kolbitsch Reto Bale |
author_facet | Peter Schullian Gregor Laimer Edward Johnston Daniel Putzer Gernot Eberle Yannick Scharll Gerlig Widmann Christian Kolbitsch Reto Bale |
author_sort | Peter Schullian |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Purpose To assess the technical outcome and local tumor control of multi-probe stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) in a large series of patients. Furthermore, to determine factors accounting for adverse outcomes.Material and methods Between 2003 and 2018, 865 patients were treated by SRFA for 2653 primary and metastatic liver tumors with a median tumor size of 2.0 cm (0.5 − 19 cm). Primary technical efficacy (PTE) and local recurrence (LR) were evaluated, and possible predictors for adverse events analyzed using uni- and multi-variable binary logistic regression.Results Overall, 2553 of 2653 tumors were successfully ablated at initial SRFA resulting in a PTE rate of 96.2%. Predictors of lower PTE rates were age > 70 years, tumor size > 5 cm, number of probes, location close to liver capsule/organs and segment II. LR occurred in 220 of 2653 tumors (8.3%) with the following predictors: age, tumor type/size, conglomerates, segments I/IVa/IVb, number of probes and location close to major vessels/bile duct. Multivariable analysis revealed tumor size > 5 cm (odds ratio [OR] 3.153), age > 70 years (OR 1.559), and location in segment II (OR 1.772) as independent prognostic factors for PTE, whereas tumor location close to major vessels (OR 1.653) and in segment IVb (OR 2.656) were identified as independent prognostic factors of LR.Conclusions Stereotactic RFA is an attractive option in the management of primary or metastatic liver tumors with good local tumor control, even in large tumors. The presented prognostic factors for adverse local oncological outcome might help to stratify unfavorable tumors for ablation. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-10T16:45:43Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-db552378491f4e938351c9de25094692 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0265-6736 1464-5157 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-10T16:45:43Z |
publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Hyperthermia |
spelling | doaj.art-db552378491f4e938351c9de250946922022-12-22T01:41:04ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Journal of Hyperthermia0265-67361464-51572022-12-0139142143010.1080/02656736.2022.2044522Technical efficacy and local recurrence after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of 2653 liver tumors: a 15-year single-center experience with evaluation of prognostic factorsPeter Schullian0Gregor Laimer1Edward Johnston2Daniel Putzer3Gernot Eberle4Yannick Scharll5Gerlig Widmann6Christian Kolbitsch7Reto Bale8Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaRoyal Marsden Hospital, London, UKDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Anesthesia, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaPurpose To assess the technical outcome and local tumor control of multi-probe stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) in a large series of patients. Furthermore, to determine factors accounting for adverse outcomes.Material and methods Between 2003 and 2018, 865 patients were treated by SRFA for 2653 primary and metastatic liver tumors with a median tumor size of 2.0 cm (0.5 − 19 cm). Primary technical efficacy (PTE) and local recurrence (LR) were evaluated, and possible predictors for adverse events analyzed using uni- and multi-variable binary logistic regression.Results Overall, 2553 of 2653 tumors were successfully ablated at initial SRFA resulting in a PTE rate of 96.2%. Predictors of lower PTE rates were age > 70 years, tumor size > 5 cm, number of probes, location close to liver capsule/organs and segment II. LR occurred in 220 of 2653 tumors (8.3%) with the following predictors: age, tumor type/size, conglomerates, segments I/IVa/IVb, number of probes and location close to major vessels/bile duct. Multivariable analysis revealed tumor size > 5 cm (odds ratio [OR] 3.153), age > 70 years (OR 1.559), and location in segment II (OR 1.772) as independent prognostic factors for PTE, whereas tumor location close to major vessels (OR 1.653) and in segment IVb (OR 2.656) were identified as independent prognostic factors of LR.Conclusions Stereotactic RFA is an attractive option in the management of primary or metastatic liver tumors with good local tumor control, even in large tumors. The presented prognostic factors for adverse local oncological outcome might help to stratify unfavorable tumors for ablation.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/02656736.2022.2044522Radiofrequency ablationstereotaxyliver malignancieslocal recurrenceprimary technical efficacy |
spellingShingle | Peter Schullian Gregor Laimer Edward Johnston Daniel Putzer Gernot Eberle Yannick Scharll Gerlig Widmann Christian Kolbitsch Reto Bale Technical efficacy and local recurrence after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of 2653 liver tumors: a 15-year single-center experience with evaluation of prognostic factors International Journal of Hyperthermia Radiofrequency ablation stereotaxy liver malignancies local recurrence primary technical efficacy |
title | Technical efficacy and local recurrence after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of 2653 liver tumors: a 15-year single-center experience with evaluation of prognostic factors |
title_full | Technical efficacy and local recurrence after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of 2653 liver tumors: a 15-year single-center experience with evaluation of prognostic factors |
title_fullStr | Technical efficacy and local recurrence after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of 2653 liver tumors: a 15-year single-center experience with evaluation of prognostic factors |
title_full_unstemmed | Technical efficacy and local recurrence after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of 2653 liver tumors: a 15-year single-center experience with evaluation of prognostic factors |
title_short | Technical efficacy and local recurrence after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of 2653 liver tumors: a 15-year single-center experience with evaluation of prognostic factors |
title_sort | technical efficacy and local recurrence after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of 2653 liver tumors a 15 year single center experience with evaluation of prognostic factors |
topic | Radiofrequency ablation stereotaxy liver malignancies local recurrence primary technical efficacy |
url | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/02656736.2022.2044522 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peterschullian technicalefficacyandlocalrecurrenceafterstereotacticradiofrequencyablationof2653livertumorsa15yearsinglecenterexperiencewithevaluationofprognosticfactors AT gregorlaimer technicalefficacyandlocalrecurrenceafterstereotacticradiofrequencyablationof2653livertumorsa15yearsinglecenterexperiencewithevaluationofprognosticfactors AT edwardjohnston technicalefficacyandlocalrecurrenceafterstereotacticradiofrequencyablationof2653livertumorsa15yearsinglecenterexperiencewithevaluationofprognosticfactors AT danielputzer technicalefficacyandlocalrecurrenceafterstereotacticradiofrequencyablationof2653livertumorsa15yearsinglecenterexperiencewithevaluationofprognosticfactors AT gernoteberle technicalefficacyandlocalrecurrenceafterstereotacticradiofrequencyablationof2653livertumorsa15yearsinglecenterexperiencewithevaluationofprognosticfactors AT yannickscharll technicalefficacyandlocalrecurrenceafterstereotacticradiofrequencyablationof2653livertumorsa15yearsinglecenterexperiencewithevaluationofprognosticfactors AT gerligwidmann technicalefficacyandlocalrecurrenceafterstereotacticradiofrequencyablationof2653livertumorsa15yearsinglecenterexperiencewithevaluationofprognosticfactors AT christiankolbitsch technicalefficacyandlocalrecurrenceafterstereotacticradiofrequencyablationof2653livertumorsa15yearsinglecenterexperiencewithevaluationofprognosticfactors AT retobale technicalefficacyandlocalrecurrenceafterstereotacticradiofrequencyablationof2653livertumorsa15yearsinglecenterexperiencewithevaluationofprognosticfactors |