Technical efficacy and local recurrence after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of 2653 liver tumors: a 15-year single-center experience with evaluation of prognostic factors

Purpose To assess the technical outcome and local tumor control of multi-probe stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) in a large series of patients. Furthermore, to determine factors accounting for adverse outcomes.Material and methods Between 2003 and 2018, 865 patients were treated by SRFA fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Schullian, Gregor Laimer, Edward Johnston, Daniel Putzer, Gernot Eberle, Yannick Scharll, Gerlig Widmann, Christian Kolbitsch, Reto Bale
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2022-12-01
Series:International Journal of Hyperthermia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/02656736.2022.2044522
_version_ 1818488016594796544
author Peter Schullian
Gregor Laimer
Edward Johnston
Daniel Putzer
Gernot Eberle
Yannick Scharll
Gerlig Widmann
Christian Kolbitsch
Reto Bale
author_facet Peter Schullian
Gregor Laimer
Edward Johnston
Daniel Putzer
Gernot Eberle
Yannick Scharll
Gerlig Widmann
Christian Kolbitsch
Reto Bale
author_sort Peter Schullian
collection DOAJ
description Purpose To assess the technical outcome and local tumor control of multi-probe stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) in a large series of patients. Furthermore, to determine factors accounting for adverse outcomes.Material and methods Between 2003 and 2018, 865 patients were treated by SRFA for 2653 primary and metastatic liver tumors with a median tumor size of 2.0 cm (0.5 − 19 cm). Primary technical efficacy (PTE) and local recurrence (LR) were evaluated, and possible predictors for adverse events analyzed using uni- and multi-variable binary logistic regression.Results Overall, 2553 of 2653 tumors were successfully ablated at initial SRFA resulting in a PTE rate of 96.2%. Predictors of lower PTE rates were age > 70 years, tumor size > 5 cm, number of probes, location close to liver capsule/organs and segment II. LR occurred in 220 of 2653 tumors (8.3%) with the following predictors: age, tumor type/size, conglomerates, segments I/IVa/IVb, number of probes and location close to major vessels/bile duct. Multivariable analysis revealed tumor size > 5 cm (odds ratio [OR] 3.153), age > 70 years (OR 1.559), and location in segment II (OR 1.772) as independent prognostic factors for PTE, whereas tumor location close to major vessels (OR 1.653) and in segment IVb (OR 2.656) were identified as independent prognostic factors of LR.Conclusions Stereotactic RFA is an attractive option in the management of primary or metastatic liver tumors with good local tumor control, even in large tumors. The presented prognostic factors for adverse local oncological outcome might help to stratify unfavorable tumors for ablation.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T16:45:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-db552378491f4e938351c9de25094692
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0265-6736
1464-5157
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T16:45:43Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series International Journal of Hyperthermia
spelling doaj.art-db552378491f4e938351c9de250946922022-12-22T01:41:04ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Journal of Hyperthermia0265-67361464-51572022-12-0139142143010.1080/02656736.2022.2044522Technical efficacy and local recurrence after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of 2653 liver tumors: a 15-year single-center experience with evaluation of prognostic factorsPeter Schullian0Gregor Laimer1Edward Johnston2Daniel Putzer3Gernot Eberle4Yannick Scharll5Gerlig Widmann6Christian Kolbitsch7Reto Bale8Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaRoyal Marsden Hospital, London, UKDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Anesthesia, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AustriaPurpose To assess the technical outcome and local tumor control of multi-probe stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) in a large series of patients. Furthermore, to determine factors accounting for adverse outcomes.Material and methods Between 2003 and 2018, 865 patients were treated by SRFA for 2653 primary and metastatic liver tumors with a median tumor size of 2.0 cm (0.5 − 19 cm). Primary technical efficacy (PTE) and local recurrence (LR) were evaluated, and possible predictors for adverse events analyzed using uni- and multi-variable binary logistic regression.Results Overall, 2553 of 2653 tumors were successfully ablated at initial SRFA resulting in a PTE rate of 96.2%. Predictors of lower PTE rates were age > 70 years, tumor size > 5 cm, number of probes, location close to liver capsule/organs and segment II. LR occurred in 220 of 2653 tumors (8.3%) with the following predictors: age, tumor type/size, conglomerates, segments I/IVa/IVb, number of probes and location close to major vessels/bile duct. Multivariable analysis revealed tumor size > 5 cm (odds ratio [OR] 3.153), age > 70 years (OR 1.559), and location in segment II (OR 1.772) as independent prognostic factors for PTE, whereas tumor location close to major vessels (OR 1.653) and in segment IVb (OR 2.656) were identified as independent prognostic factors of LR.Conclusions Stereotactic RFA is an attractive option in the management of primary or metastatic liver tumors with good local tumor control, even in large tumors. The presented prognostic factors for adverse local oncological outcome might help to stratify unfavorable tumors for ablation.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/02656736.2022.2044522Radiofrequency ablationstereotaxyliver malignancieslocal recurrenceprimary technical efficacy
spellingShingle Peter Schullian
Gregor Laimer
Edward Johnston
Daniel Putzer
Gernot Eberle
Yannick Scharll
Gerlig Widmann
Christian Kolbitsch
Reto Bale
Technical efficacy and local recurrence after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of 2653 liver tumors: a 15-year single-center experience with evaluation of prognostic factors
International Journal of Hyperthermia
Radiofrequency ablation
stereotaxy
liver malignancies
local recurrence
primary technical efficacy
title Technical efficacy and local recurrence after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of 2653 liver tumors: a 15-year single-center experience with evaluation of prognostic factors
title_full Technical efficacy and local recurrence after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of 2653 liver tumors: a 15-year single-center experience with evaluation of prognostic factors
title_fullStr Technical efficacy and local recurrence after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of 2653 liver tumors: a 15-year single-center experience with evaluation of prognostic factors
title_full_unstemmed Technical efficacy and local recurrence after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of 2653 liver tumors: a 15-year single-center experience with evaluation of prognostic factors
title_short Technical efficacy and local recurrence after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of 2653 liver tumors: a 15-year single-center experience with evaluation of prognostic factors
title_sort technical efficacy and local recurrence after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of 2653 liver tumors a 15 year single center experience with evaluation of prognostic factors
topic Radiofrequency ablation
stereotaxy
liver malignancies
local recurrence
primary technical efficacy
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/02656736.2022.2044522
work_keys_str_mv AT peterschullian technicalefficacyandlocalrecurrenceafterstereotacticradiofrequencyablationof2653livertumorsa15yearsinglecenterexperiencewithevaluationofprognosticfactors
AT gregorlaimer technicalefficacyandlocalrecurrenceafterstereotacticradiofrequencyablationof2653livertumorsa15yearsinglecenterexperiencewithevaluationofprognosticfactors
AT edwardjohnston technicalefficacyandlocalrecurrenceafterstereotacticradiofrequencyablationof2653livertumorsa15yearsinglecenterexperiencewithevaluationofprognosticfactors
AT danielputzer technicalefficacyandlocalrecurrenceafterstereotacticradiofrequencyablationof2653livertumorsa15yearsinglecenterexperiencewithevaluationofprognosticfactors
AT gernoteberle technicalefficacyandlocalrecurrenceafterstereotacticradiofrequencyablationof2653livertumorsa15yearsinglecenterexperiencewithevaluationofprognosticfactors
AT yannickscharll technicalefficacyandlocalrecurrenceafterstereotacticradiofrequencyablationof2653livertumorsa15yearsinglecenterexperiencewithevaluationofprognosticfactors
AT gerligwidmann technicalefficacyandlocalrecurrenceafterstereotacticradiofrequencyablationof2653livertumorsa15yearsinglecenterexperiencewithevaluationofprognosticfactors
AT christiankolbitsch technicalefficacyandlocalrecurrenceafterstereotacticradiofrequencyablationof2653livertumorsa15yearsinglecenterexperiencewithevaluationofprognosticfactors
AT retobale technicalefficacyandlocalrecurrenceafterstereotacticradiofrequencyablationof2653livertumorsa15yearsinglecenterexperiencewithevaluationofprognosticfactors