Virtual prenatal visits associated with high measures of patient experience and satisfaction among average-risk patients: a prospective cohort study

Abstract Background Virtual visits have the potential to decrease barriers to prenatal care stemming from transportation, work, and childcare concerns. However, data regarding patient experience and satisfaction with virtual visits remain limited in obstetrics. To address this gap, we explore averag...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bethany Bruno, Mary Beth Mercer, Sabahat Hizlan, Julian Peskin, Paul J. Ford, Ruth M. Farrell, Susannah L. Rose
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-04-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05421-y
_version_ 1797849865290514432
author Bethany Bruno
Mary Beth Mercer
Sabahat Hizlan
Julian Peskin
Paul J. Ford
Ruth M. Farrell
Susannah L. Rose
author_facet Bethany Bruno
Mary Beth Mercer
Sabahat Hizlan
Julian Peskin
Paul J. Ford
Ruth M. Farrell
Susannah L. Rose
author_sort Bethany Bruno
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Virtual visits have the potential to decrease barriers to prenatal care stemming from transportation, work, and childcare concerns. However, data regarding patient experience and satisfaction with virtual visits remain limited in obstetrics. To address this gap, we explore average-risk pregnant women’s experiences with virtual visits and compare satisfaction with virtual vs. in-person visits as a secondary aim. Methods In this IRB-approved, prospective cohort study, we surveyed pregnant women after their first virtual visit between October 7, 2019 and March 20, 2020. Using heterogeneous purposive sampling, we identified a subset of respondents with diverse experiences and opinions for interviews. For comparison, Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) satisfaction data were collected after in-person visits during the study timeframe from a control cohort with the same prenatal providers. Logistic regression controlling for age, previous pregnancies, and prior live births compared satisfaction data between virtual and in-person visits. Other quantitative survey data were analyzed through descriptive statistics. Free text survey responses and interview data were analyzed using content analysis. Results Ninety five percent (n = 165/174) of surveys and 90% (n = 18/20) of interviews were completed. Most participants were Caucasian, married, and of middle to high income. 69% (114/165) agreed that their virtual appointment was as good as in-person; only 13% (21/165) disagreed. Almost all (148/165, 90%) would make another virtual appointment. Qualitative data highlighted ease of access, comparable provider-patient communication, confidence in care quality, and positive remote monitoring experiences. Recognizing these advantages but also inherent limitations, interviews emphasized interspersing telemedicine with in-person prenatal encounters. CAHPS responses after in-person visits were available for 60 patients. Logistic regression revealed no significant difference in three measures of satisfaction (p = 0.16, 0.09, 0.13) between virtual and in-person visits. Conclusions In an average-risk population, virtual prenatal visits provide a patient-centered alternative to traditional in-person encounters with high measures of patient experience and no significant difference in satisfaction. Obstetric providers should explore telemedicine to improve access – and, during the ongoing pandemic, to minimize exposures – using patients’ experiences for guidance. More research is needed regarding virtual visits’ medical quality, integration into prenatal schedules, and provision of equitable care for diverse populations.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T18:51:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-db5995f4aa6c48088601e78a61535900
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2393
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T18:51:06Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
spelling doaj.art-db5995f4aa6c48088601e78a615359002023-04-09T11:29:24ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932023-04-0123111110.1186/s12884-023-05421-yVirtual prenatal visits associated with high measures of patient experience and satisfaction among average-risk patients: a prospective cohort studyBethany Bruno0Mary Beth Mercer1Sabahat Hizlan2Julian Peskin3Paul J. Ford4Ruth M. Farrell5Susannah L. Rose6Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Medical University of South CarolinaOffice of Patient Experience, Cleveland ClinicOffice of Patient Experience, Cleveland ClinicCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve UniversityCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve UniversityCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve UniversityCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve UniversityAbstract Background Virtual visits have the potential to decrease barriers to prenatal care stemming from transportation, work, and childcare concerns. However, data regarding patient experience and satisfaction with virtual visits remain limited in obstetrics. To address this gap, we explore average-risk pregnant women’s experiences with virtual visits and compare satisfaction with virtual vs. in-person visits as a secondary aim. Methods In this IRB-approved, prospective cohort study, we surveyed pregnant women after their first virtual visit between October 7, 2019 and March 20, 2020. Using heterogeneous purposive sampling, we identified a subset of respondents with diverse experiences and opinions for interviews. For comparison, Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) satisfaction data were collected after in-person visits during the study timeframe from a control cohort with the same prenatal providers. Logistic regression controlling for age, previous pregnancies, and prior live births compared satisfaction data between virtual and in-person visits. Other quantitative survey data were analyzed through descriptive statistics. Free text survey responses and interview data were analyzed using content analysis. Results Ninety five percent (n = 165/174) of surveys and 90% (n = 18/20) of interviews were completed. Most participants were Caucasian, married, and of middle to high income. 69% (114/165) agreed that their virtual appointment was as good as in-person; only 13% (21/165) disagreed. Almost all (148/165, 90%) would make another virtual appointment. Qualitative data highlighted ease of access, comparable provider-patient communication, confidence in care quality, and positive remote monitoring experiences. Recognizing these advantages but also inherent limitations, interviews emphasized interspersing telemedicine with in-person prenatal encounters. CAHPS responses after in-person visits were available for 60 patients. Logistic regression revealed no significant difference in three measures of satisfaction (p = 0.16, 0.09, 0.13) between virtual and in-person visits. Conclusions In an average-risk population, virtual prenatal visits provide a patient-centered alternative to traditional in-person encounters with high measures of patient experience and no significant difference in satisfaction. Obstetric providers should explore telemedicine to improve access – and, during the ongoing pandemic, to minimize exposures – using patients’ experiences for guidance. More research is needed regarding virtual visits’ medical quality, integration into prenatal schedules, and provision of equitable care for diverse populations.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05421-yPrenatal careObstetricsPatient experienceHealthcare accessRemote monitoringSurvey research
spellingShingle Bethany Bruno
Mary Beth Mercer
Sabahat Hizlan
Julian Peskin
Paul J. Ford
Ruth M. Farrell
Susannah L. Rose
Virtual prenatal visits associated with high measures of patient experience and satisfaction among average-risk patients: a prospective cohort study
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prenatal care
Obstetrics
Patient experience
Healthcare access
Remote monitoring
Survey research
title Virtual prenatal visits associated with high measures of patient experience and satisfaction among average-risk patients: a prospective cohort study
title_full Virtual prenatal visits associated with high measures of patient experience and satisfaction among average-risk patients: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Virtual prenatal visits associated with high measures of patient experience and satisfaction among average-risk patients: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Virtual prenatal visits associated with high measures of patient experience and satisfaction among average-risk patients: a prospective cohort study
title_short Virtual prenatal visits associated with high measures of patient experience and satisfaction among average-risk patients: a prospective cohort study
title_sort virtual prenatal visits associated with high measures of patient experience and satisfaction among average risk patients a prospective cohort study
topic Prenatal care
Obstetrics
Patient experience
Healthcare access
Remote monitoring
Survey research
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05421-y
work_keys_str_mv AT bethanybruno virtualprenatalvisitsassociatedwithhighmeasuresofpatientexperienceandsatisfactionamongaverageriskpatientsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT marybethmercer virtualprenatalvisitsassociatedwithhighmeasuresofpatientexperienceandsatisfactionamongaverageriskpatientsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT sabahathizlan virtualprenatalvisitsassociatedwithhighmeasuresofpatientexperienceandsatisfactionamongaverageriskpatientsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT julianpeskin virtualprenatalvisitsassociatedwithhighmeasuresofpatientexperienceandsatisfactionamongaverageriskpatientsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT pauljford virtualprenatalvisitsassociatedwithhighmeasuresofpatientexperienceandsatisfactionamongaverageriskpatientsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT ruthmfarrell virtualprenatalvisitsassociatedwithhighmeasuresofpatientexperienceandsatisfactionamongaverageriskpatientsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT susannahlrose virtualprenatalvisitsassociatedwithhighmeasuresofpatientexperienceandsatisfactionamongaverageriskpatientsaprospectivecohortstudy