A comprehensive evaluation of the use of Lagrangian particle dispersion models for inverse modeling of greenhouse gas emissions

<p>Using the example of sulfur hexafluoride (<span class="inline-formula">SF<sub>6</sub></span>), we investigate the use of Lagrangian particle dispersion models (LPDMs) for inverse modeling of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and explore the limitations of this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Vojta, A. Plach, R. L. Thompson, A. Stohl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2022-11-01
Series:Geoscientific Model Development
Online Access:https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/8295/2022/gmd-15-8295-2022.pdf
_version_ 1811307849564815360
author M. Vojta
A. Plach
A. Plach
R. L. Thompson
A. Stohl
author_facet M. Vojta
A. Plach
A. Plach
R. L. Thompson
A. Stohl
author_sort M. Vojta
collection DOAJ
description <p>Using the example of sulfur hexafluoride (<span class="inline-formula">SF<sub>6</sub></span>), we investigate the use of Lagrangian particle dispersion models (LPDMs) for inverse modeling of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and explore the limitations of this approach. We put the main focus on the impacts of baseline methods and the LPDM backward simulation period on the a posteriori emissions determined by the inversion. We consider baseline methods that are based on a statistical selection of observations at individual measurement sites and a global-distribution-based (GDB) approach, where global mixing ratio fields are coupled to the LPDM back-trajectories at their termination points. We show that purely statistical baseline methods can cause large systematic errors, which lead to inversion results that are sensitive to the LPDM backward simulation period and can generate unrealistic global total a posteriori emissions. The GDB method produces a posteriori emissions that are far less sensitive to the backward simulation period and that show a better agreement with recognized global total emissions. Our results show that longer backward simulation periods, beyond the often used 5 to 10 d, reduce the mean squared error and increase the correlation between a priori modeled and observed mixing ratios. Also, the inversion becomes less sensitive to biases in the a priori emissions and the global mixing ratio fields for longer backward simulation periods. Further, longer periods might help to better constrain emissions in regions poorly covered by the global <span class="inline-formula">SF<sub>6</sub></span> monitoring network. We find that the inclusion of existing flask measurements in the inversion helps to further close these gaps and suggest that a few additional and well-placed flask sampling sites would have great value for improving global a posteriori emission fields.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-13T09:12:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-db5d4dbb409c4edc884a1cdbb09dde31
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1991-959X
1991-9603
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T09:12:42Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Geoscientific Model Development
spelling doaj.art-db5d4dbb409c4edc884a1cdbb09dde312022-12-22T02:52:51ZengCopernicus PublicationsGeoscientific Model Development1991-959X1991-96032022-11-01158295832310.5194/gmd-15-8295-2022A comprehensive evaluation of the use of Lagrangian particle dispersion models for inverse modeling of greenhouse gas emissionsM. Vojta0A. Plach1A. Plach2R. L. Thompson3A. Stohl4Department of Meteorology and Geophysics, University of Vienna, Vienna, AustriaDepartment of Meteorology and Geophysics, University of Vienna, Vienna, AustriaPhysics Institute, Climate and Environmental Physics, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandNorwegian Institute for Air Research NILU, Kjeller, NorwayDepartment of Meteorology and Geophysics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria<p>Using the example of sulfur hexafluoride (<span class="inline-formula">SF<sub>6</sub></span>), we investigate the use of Lagrangian particle dispersion models (LPDMs) for inverse modeling of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and explore the limitations of this approach. We put the main focus on the impacts of baseline methods and the LPDM backward simulation period on the a posteriori emissions determined by the inversion. We consider baseline methods that are based on a statistical selection of observations at individual measurement sites and a global-distribution-based (GDB) approach, where global mixing ratio fields are coupled to the LPDM back-trajectories at their termination points. We show that purely statistical baseline methods can cause large systematic errors, which lead to inversion results that are sensitive to the LPDM backward simulation period and can generate unrealistic global total a posteriori emissions. The GDB method produces a posteriori emissions that are far less sensitive to the backward simulation period and that show a better agreement with recognized global total emissions. Our results show that longer backward simulation periods, beyond the often used 5 to 10 d, reduce the mean squared error and increase the correlation between a priori modeled and observed mixing ratios. Also, the inversion becomes less sensitive to biases in the a priori emissions and the global mixing ratio fields for longer backward simulation periods. Further, longer periods might help to better constrain emissions in regions poorly covered by the global <span class="inline-formula">SF<sub>6</sub></span> monitoring network. We find that the inclusion of existing flask measurements in the inversion helps to further close these gaps and suggest that a few additional and well-placed flask sampling sites would have great value for improving global a posteriori emission fields.</p>https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/8295/2022/gmd-15-8295-2022.pdf
spellingShingle M. Vojta
A. Plach
A. Plach
R. L. Thompson
A. Stohl
A comprehensive evaluation of the use of Lagrangian particle dispersion models for inverse modeling of greenhouse gas emissions
Geoscientific Model Development
title A comprehensive evaluation of the use of Lagrangian particle dispersion models for inverse modeling of greenhouse gas emissions
title_full A comprehensive evaluation of the use of Lagrangian particle dispersion models for inverse modeling of greenhouse gas emissions
title_fullStr A comprehensive evaluation of the use of Lagrangian particle dispersion models for inverse modeling of greenhouse gas emissions
title_full_unstemmed A comprehensive evaluation of the use of Lagrangian particle dispersion models for inverse modeling of greenhouse gas emissions
title_short A comprehensive evaluation of the use of Lagrangian particle dispersion models for inverse modeling of greenhouse gas emissions
title_sort comprehensive evaluation of the use of lagrangian particle dispersion models for inverse modeling of greenhouse gas emissions
url https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/15/8295/2022/gmd-15-8295-2022.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mvojta acomprehensiveevaluationoftheuseoflagrangianparticledispersionmodelsforinversemodelingofgreenhousegasemissions
AT aplach acomprehensiveevaluationoftheuseoflagrangianparticledispersionmodelsforinversemodelingofgreenhousegasemissions
AT aplach acomprehensiveevaluationoftheuseoflagrangianparticledispersionmodelsforinversemodelingofgreenhousegasemissions
AT rlthompson acomprehensiveevaluationoftheuseoflagrangianparticledispersionmodelsforinversemodelingofgreenhousegasemissions
AT astohl acomprehensiveevaluationoftheuseoflagrangianparticledispersionmodelsforinversemodelingofgreenhousegasemissions
AT mvojta comprehensiveevaluationoftheuseoflagrangianparticledispersionmodelsforinversemodelingofgreenhousegasemissions
AT aplach comprehensiveevaluationoftheuseoflagrangianparticledispersionmodelsforinversemodelingofgreenhousegasemissions
AT aplach comprehensiveevaluationoftheuseoflagrangianparticledispersionmodelsforinversemodelingofgreenhousegasemissions
AT rlthompson comprehensiveevaluationoftheuseoflagrangianparticledispersionmodelsforinversemodelingofgreenhousegasemissions
AT astohl comprehensiveevaluationoftheuseoflagrangianparticledispersionmodelsforinversemodelingofgreenhousegasemissions