How can MCDA tools improve priority setting? Four critical questions
Abstract This comment argues that four critical questions needs to be resolved before MCDA tools can improve priority setting in health: how to merge the quantitative and deliberative elements of MCDA; how to select criteria; how to weigh them, and whom to bring to the table.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-11-01
|
Series: | Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12962-018-0119-6 |
_version_ | 1818280763658862592 |
---|---|
author | Ole F. Norheim |
author_facet | Ole F. Norheim |
author_sort | Ole F. Norheim |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract This comment argues that four critical questions needs to be resolved before MCDA tools can improve priority setting in health: how to merge the quantitative and deliberative elements of MCDA; how to select criteria; how to weigh them, and whom to bring to the table. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-12T23:54:24Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-db6ace2ddcd549efa3f3d67f273d895b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1478-7547 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-12T23:54:24Z |
publishDate | 2018-11-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation |
spelling | doaj.art-db6ace2ddcd549efa3f3d67f273d895b2022-12-22T00:06:37ZengBMCCost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation1478-75472018-11-0116S11310.1186/s12962-018-0119-6How can MCDA tools improve priority setting? Four critical questionsOle F. Norheim0Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of BergenAbstract This comment argues that four critical questions needs to be resolved before MCDA tools can improve priority setting in health: how to merge the quantitative and deliberative elements of MCDA; how to select criteria; how to weigh them, and whom to bring to the table.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12962-018-0119-6Priority settingMulti-criteria decision analysisCost-effectivenessEquity |
spellingShingle | Ole F. Norheim How can MCDA tools improve priority setting? Four critical questions Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation Priority setting Multi-criteria decision analysis Cost-effectiveness Equity |
title | How can MCDA tools improve priority setting? Four critical questions |
title_full | How can MCDA tools improve priority setting? Four critical questions |
title_fullStr | How can MCDA tools improve priority setting? Four critical questions |
title_full_unstemmed | How can MCDA tools improve priority setting? Four critical questions |
title_short | How can MCDA tools improve priority setting? Four critical questions |
title_sort | how can mcda tools improve priority setting four critical questions |
topic | Priority setting Multi-criteria decision analysis Cost-effectiveness Equity |
url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12962-018-0119-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT olefnorheim howcanmcdatoolsimproveprioritysettingfourcriticalquestions |