How can MCDA tools improve priority setting? Four critical questions
Abstract This comment argues that four critical questions needs to be resolved before MCDA tools can improve priority setting in health: how to merge the quantitative and deliberative elements of MCDA; how to select criteria; how to weigh them, and whom to bring to the table.
Main Author: | Ole F. Norheim |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-11-01
|
Series: | Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12962-018-0119-6 |
Similar Items
-
HTA and MCDA solely or combined? The case of priority-setting in Colombia
by: Héctor E. Castro, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Priority setting in health: development and application of a multi-criteria algorithm for the population of New Zealand’s Waikato region
by: Rashmi Dayalu, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Priority Setting on the Path to UHC: Time for Stronger Institutions and Stronger Health Systems: Response to Recent Commentaries
by: Ole F. Norheim
Published: (2019-08-01) -
Mapping of multiple criteria for priority setting of health interventions: an aid for decision makers
by: Tromp Noor, et al.
Published: (2012-12-01) -
Disease Control Priorities Third Edition Is Published: A Theory of Change Is Needed for Translating Evidence to Health Policy
by: Ole F. Norheim
Published: (2018-09-01)