The Critical Role of Institutional Services in Open Access Advocacy
This paper examines the development of the Open Access movement in scholarly communication, with particular attention to some of the rhetorical strategies and policy mechanisms used to promote it to scholars and scientists. Despite the majority of journal publishers’ acceptance of author self-arch...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Edinburgh
2013-06-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Digital Curation |
Online Access: | http://localhost:8032/ijdc/article/view/238 |
_version_ | 1797402155047452672 |
---|---|
author | Tomasz Neugebauer Annie Murray |
author_facet | Tomasz Neugebauer Annie Murray |
author_sort | Tomasz Neugebauer |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This paper examines the development of the Open Access movement in scholarly communication, with particular attention to some of the rhetorical strategies and policy mechanisms used to promote it to scholars and scientists. Despite the majority of journal publishers’ acceptance of author self-archiving practices, and the minimal time commitment required by authors to successfully self-archive their work in disciplinary or institutional repositories, the majority of authors still by and large avoid participation. The paper reviews the strategies and arguments used for increasing author participation in open access, including the role of open access mandates. We recommend a service-oriented approach towards increasing participation in open access, rather than rhetoric that speculates on the benefits that open access will have on text/data mining innovation. In advocating for open access participation, we recommend focusing on its most universal and tangible purpose: increasing public open (gratis) access to the published results of publicly funded research. Researchers require strong institutional support to understand the copyright climate of open access self-archiving, user-friendly interfaces and useful metrics, such as repository usage statistics. We recommend that mandates and well-crafted and responsive author support services at universities will ultimately be required to ensure the growth of open access. We describe the mediated deposit service that was developed to support author self-archiving in Spectrum: Concordia University Research Repository. By comparing the number of deposits of non-thesis materials (e.g. articles and conference presentations) that were accomplished through the staff-mediated deposit service to the number of deposits that were author-initiated, we demonstrate the relative significance of this service to the growth of the repository.
|
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T02:21:17Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-db71d5d866a34228af29215ea41b8691 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1746-8256 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T02:21:17Z |
publishDate | 2013-06-01 |
publisher | University of Edinburgh |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Digital Curation |
spelling | doaj.art-db71d5d866a34228af29215ea41b86912023-12-06T17:44:13ZengUniversity of EdinburghInternational Journal of Digital Curation1746-82562013-06-0181The Critical Role of Institutional Services in Open Access AdvocacyTomasz NeugebauerAnnie MurrayThis paper examines the development of the Open Access movement in scholarly communication, with particular attention to some of the rhetorical strategies and policy mechanisms used to promote it to scholars and scientists. Despite the majority of journal publishers’ acceptance of author self-archiving practices, and the minimal time commitment required by authors to successfully self-archive their work in disciplinary or institutional repositories, the majority of authors still by and large avoid participation. The paper reviews the strategies and arguments used for increasing author participation in open access, including the role of open access mandates. We recommend a service-oriented approach towards increasing participation in open access, rather than rhetoric that speculates on the benefits that open access will have on text/data mining innovation. In advocating for open access participation, we recommend focusing on its most universal and tangible purpose: increasing public open (gratis) access to the published results of publicly funded research. Researchers require strong institutional support to understand the copyright climate of open access self-archiving, user-friendly interfaces and useful metrics, such as repository usage statistics. We recommend that mandates and well-crafted and responsive author support services at universities will ultimately be required to ensure the growth of open access. We describe the mediated deposit service that was developed to support author self-archiving in Spectrum: Concordia University Research Repository. By comparing the number of deposits of non-thesis materials (e.g. articles and conference presentations) that were accomplished through the staff-mediated deposit service to the number of deposits that were author-initiated, we demonstrate the relative significance of this service to the growth of the repository. http://localhost:8032/ijdc/article/view/238 |
spellingShingle | Tomasz Neugebauer Annie Murray The Critical Role of Institutional Services in Open Access Advocacy International Journal of Digital Curation |
title | The Critical Role of Institutional Services in Open Access Advocacy |
title_full | The Critical Role of Institutional Services in Open Access Advocacy |
title_fullStr | The Critical Role of Institutional Services in Open Access Advocacy |
title_full_unstemmed | The Critical Role of Institutional Services in Open Access Advocacy |
title_short | The Critical Role of Institutional Services in Open Access Advocacy |
title_sort | critical role of institutional services in open access advocacy |
url | http://localhost:8032/ijdc/article/view/238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tomaszneugebauer thecriticalroleofinstitutionalservicesinopenaccessadvocacy AT anniemurray thecriticalroleofinstitutionalservicesinopenaccessadvocacy AT tomaszneugebauer criticalroleofinstitutionalservicesinopenaccessadvocacy AT anniemurray criticalroleofinstitutionalservicesinopenaccessadvocacy |