Vaginal hysterectomy vs. laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas: a retrospective study

Introduction: Uterine leiomyomas are the most common benign tumors of the female reproductive system. Although the majority of myomas are asymptomatic, some patients have symptoms or signs of varying degrees and require a hysterectomy. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical results of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ewelina Litwińska, Marek Nowak, Dorota Kolasa-Zwierzchowska, Anna Nowińska-Serwach, Jacek Władziński, Artur Szpakowski, Marian Szpakowski, Jacek R. Wilczyński, Tomasz Stetkiewicz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Termedia Publishing House 2014-09-01
Series:Menopause Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.termedia.pl/Vaginal-hysterectomy-vs-laparoscopically-assisted-vaginal-hysterectomy-in-women-with-symptomatic-uterine-leiomyomas-a-retrospective-study,4,23464,1,1.html
_version_ 1818275224365301760
author Ewelina Litwińska
Marek Nowak
Dorota Kolasa-Zwierzchowska
Anna Nowińska-Serwach
Jacek Władziński
Artur Szpakowski
Marian Szpakowski
Jacek R. Wilczyński
Tomasz Stetkiewicz
author_facet Ewelina Litwińska
Marek Nowak
Dorota Kolasa-Zwierzchowska
Anna Nowińska-Serwach
Jacek Władziński
Artur Szpakowski
Marian Szpakowski
Jacek R. Wilczyński
Tomasz Stetkiewicz
author_sort Ewelina Litwińska
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Uterine leiomyomas are the most common benign tumors of the female reproductive system. Although the majority of myomas are asymptomatic, some patients have symptoms or signs of varying degrees and require a hysterectomy. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical results of two minimally invasive hysterectomy techniques: vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH). Material and methods : A retrospective, observational study was performed at a tertiary care center: the Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology Department, Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital Research Institute. The study period was from January 2003 to December 2012. A total of 159 women underwent either vaginal hysterectomy (VH, n = 120) or laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH, n = 39) for symptomatic uterine myomas. Outcome measures, including past medical history, blood loss, major complications, operating time and discharge time were assessed and compared between the studied groups. Statistical analysis was performed using Student t-test, U-Mann Whitney test, χ2 test and Yates‘χ2 test. P < 0.05 was considered statis­tically significant. Results : There were no differences in patients’ mean age. Parity was significantly higher in the VH group (VH 1.9 ± 0.7 vs. LAVH 1.5 ± 0.8; p = 0.008). No difference was found in the mean ± standard deviation (SD) uterine volume between vaginal hysterectomy and LAVH groups (179 ± 89 vs. 199 ± 88 cm3), respectively. The mean operative time was significantly longer for the LAVH group (83 ± 29 vs. 131 ± 30 min; p = 0.0001). The intraoperative blood loss (VH 1.3 ± 1.1 vs. LAVH 1.4 ± 0.9 g/dl; p = 0.2) and the rate of intra- and postoperative complications were similar in both groups studied. The mean discharge time was longer for LAVH than for VH (VH 4.2 ± 1.2 vs. LAVH 5.3 ± 1.3 days, p = 0.0001). Conclusions : Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and VH are safe hysterectomy techniques for women with the myomatous uterus. Concerning the LAVH, the abdominal-pelvic exploration and the ability to perform adnexectomy safely represent the major advantages comparing with VH. Vaginal hysterectomy had a shorter operating time and the mild blood loss making it a suitable method of hysterectomy for cases in which the shortest duration of surgery and anesthesia is preferable.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T22:26:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-db84ba9bd21c49488a5c868bfacf9c47
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1643-8876
2299-0038
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T22:26:21Z
publishDate 2014-09-01
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format Article
series Menopause Review
spelling doaj.art-db84ba9bd21c49488a5c868bfacf9c472022-12-22T00:09:45ZengTermedia Publishing HouseMenopause Review1643-88762299-00382014-09-0113424224610.5114/pm.2014.4500023464Vaginal hysterectomy vs. laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas: a retrospective studyEwelina LitwińskaMarek NowakDorota Kolasa-ZwierzchowskaAnna Nowińska-SerwachJacek WładzińskiArtur SzpakowskiMarian SzpakowskiJacek R. WilczyńskiTomasz StetkiewiczIntroduction: Uterine leiomyomas are the most common benign tumors of the female reproductive system. Although the majority of myomas are asymptomatic, some patients have symptoms or signs of varying degrees and require a hysterectomy. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical results of two minimally invasive hysterectomy techniques: vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH). Material and methods : A retrospective, observational study was performed at a tertiary care center: the Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology Department, Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital Research Institute. The study period was from January 2003 to December 2012. A total of 159 women underwent either vaginal hysterectomy (VH, n = 120) or laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH, n = 39) for symptomatic uterine myomas. Outcome measures, including past medical history, blood loss, major complications, operating time and discharge time were assessed and compared between the studied groups. Statistical analysis was performed using Student t-test, U-Mann Whitney test, χ2 test and Yates‘χ2 test. P < 0.05 was considered statis­tically significant. Results : There were no differences in patients’ mean age. Parity was significantly higher in the VH group (VH 1.9 ± 0.7 vs. LAVH 1.5 ± 0.8; p = 0.008). No difference was found in the mean ± standard deviation (SD) uterine volume between vaginal hysterectomy and LAVH groups (179 ± 89 vs. 199 ± 88 cm3), respectively. The mean operative time was significantly longer for the LAVH group (83 ± 29 vs. 131 ± 30 min; p = 0.0001). The intraoperative blood loss (VH 1.3 ± 1.1 vs. LAVH 1.4 ± 0.9 g/dl; p = 0.2) and the rate of intra- and postoperative complications were similar in both groups studied. The mean discharge time was longer for LAVH than for VH (VH 4.2 ± 1.2 vs. LAVH 5.3 ± 1.3 days, p = 0.0001). Conclusions : Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and VH are safe hysterectomy techniques for women with the myomatous uterus. Concerning the LAVH, the abdominal-pelvic exploration and the ability to perform adnexectomy safely represent the major advantages comparing with VH. Vaginal hysterectomy had a shorter operating time and the mild blood loss making it a suitable method of hysterectomy for cases in which the shortest duration of surgery and anesthesia is preferable.http://www.termedia.pl/Vaginal-hysterectomy-vs-laparoscopically-assisted-vaginal-hysterectomy-in-women-with-symptomatic-uterine-leiomyomas-a-retrospective-study,4,23464,1,1.htmluterine myomas vaginal hysterectomy (VH) laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH)
spellingShingle Ewelina Litwińska
Marek Nowak
Dorota Kolasa-Zwierzchowska
Anna Nowińska-Serwach
Jacek Władziński
Artur Szpakowski
Marian Szpakowski
Jacek R. Wilczyński
Tomasz Stetkiewicz
Vaginal hysterectomy vs. laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas: a retrospective study
Menopause Review
uterine myomas
vaginal hysterectomy (VH)
laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH)
title Vaginal hysterectomy vs. laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas: a retrospective study
title_full Vaginal hysterectomy vs. laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Vaginal hysterectomy vs. laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Vaginal hysterectomy vs. laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas: a retrospective study
title_short Vaginal hysterectomy vs. laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas: a retrospective study
title_sort vaginal hysterectomy vs laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas a retrospective study
topic uterine myomas
vaginal hysterectomy (VH)
laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH)
url http://www.termedia.pl/Vaginal-hysterectomy-vs-laparoscopically-assisted-vaginal-hysterectomy-in-women-with-symptomatic-uterine-leiomyomas-a-retrospective-study,4,23464,1,1.html
work_keys_str_mv AT ewelinalitwinska vaginalhysterectomyvslaparoscopicallyassistedvaginalhysterectomyinwomenwithsymptomaticuterineleiomyomasaretrospectivestudy
AT mareknowak vaginalhysterectomyvslaparoscopicallyassistedvaginalhysterectomyinwomenwithsymptomaticuterineleiomyomasaretrospectivestudy
AT dorotakolasazwierzchowska vaginalhysterectomyvslaparoscopicallyassistedvaginalhysterectomyinwomenwithsymptomaticuterineleiomyomasaretrospectivestudy
AT annanowinskaserwach vaginalhysterectomyvslaparoscopicallyassistedvaginalhysterectomyinwomenwithsymptomaticuterineleiomyomasaretrospectivestudy
AT jacekwładzinski vaginalhysterectomyvslaparoscopicallyassistedvaginalhysterectomyinwomenwithsymptomaticuterineleiomyomasaretrospectivestudy
AT arturszpakowski vaginalhysterectomyvslaparoscopicallyassistedvaginalhysterectomyinwomenwithsymptomaticuterineleiomyomasaretrospectivestudy
AT marianszpakowski vaginalhysterectomyvslaparoscopicallyassistedvaginalhysterectomyinwomenwithsymptomaticuterineleiomyomasaretrospectivestudy
AT jacekrwilczynski vaginalhysterectomyvslaparoscopicallyassistedvaginalhysterectomyinwomenwithsymptomaticuterineleiomyomasaretrospectivestudy
AT tomaszstetkiewicz vaginalhysterectomyvslaparoscopicallyassistedvaginalhysterectomyinwomenwithsymptomaticuterineleiomyomasaretrospectivestudy