Simondon and Bohm between determinism and indeterminism
The radical redefinition of the landscape of physics that followed the contributions of Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg at the start of the 20th century led to plethora [of] new perspectives on age-old metaphysical questions on determinism and the nature of reality. The main contention of...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | Filozofija i Društvo |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2022/0353-57382203648J.pdf |
| Summary: | The radical redefinition of the landscape of physics that followed the
contributions of Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg at the start of the 20th
century led to plethora [of] new perspectives on age-old metaphysical
questions on determinism and the nature of reality. The main contention of
this article is that the work of Gilbert Simondon - whose magnum opus
possesses a scope uniting the most basic philosophical concerns with the
(then) most recent breakthroughs in natural sciences - is highly relevant
for an adequate understanding of the split between determinism and
indeterminism, as well as the underlying presuppositions which have driven
some influential contributions to this topic. To this end, the article shows
that the more deterministic interpretation of quantum mechanics offered by
David Bohm and Louis de Broglie proves to be a valuable reference point for
a more precise use and understanding of Simondon’s transductive logic -
especially when its philosophical lapses are considered closely. Finally,
following the considerations of both thinkers, we aim at a more precise
reconsideration of the stakes of indeterminism in modern physics, as well as
a restructuration of what is often understood as a polarization. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0353-5738 2334-8577 |