The prevalence of intimate partner violence among couples signing up for universally offered parent preparation.

BACKGROUND:Intimate partner violence (IPV) during pregnancy can have serious health consequences for mothers and the unborn child. Nevertheless, IPV is seldom addressed in the context of parent preparation. AIM:This study aimed to map the prevalence, direction, and severity of IPV in a sample of exp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tea L Trillingsgaard, Hanne N Fentz, Marianne Simonsen, Richard E Heyman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223824
_version_ 1819019811500326912
author Tea L Trillingsgaard
Hanne N Fentz
Marianne Simonsen
Richard E Heyman
author_facet Tea L Trillingsgaard
Hanne N Fentz
Marianne Simonsen
Richard E Heyman
author_sort Tea L Trillingsgaard
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND:Intimate partner violence (IPV) during pregnancy can have serious health consequences for mothers and the unborn child. Nevertheless, IPV is seldom addressed in the context of parent preparation. AIM:This study aimed to map the prevalence, direction, and severity of IPV in a sample of expectant couples signing up for universally-offered parent preparation. METHOD:A total of 1726 Danish couples expecting their first child provided data on physical and psychological IPV by completing the Family Maltreatment measure during the second trimester of pregnancy. RESULTS:In 18.5% of the couples, at least one partner reported psychological or physical IPV acts during the past year. In more than 8% of couples, one or both partners reported acts and impacts above the ICD-11 threshold for clinically-significant IPV (CS-IPV) during the past year (3.6% physical CS-IPV, 5.3% psychological CS-IPV, and 0.8% both physical and psychological CS-IPV). Among couples with physical IPV below the clinical threshold, pregnant-woman-to-partner (50%) and bidirectional (38.2%) IPV were more common than partner-to-pregnant-woman IPV (11.8%). Among couples with physical CS-IPV, pregnant-woman-to-partner (36.1%), partner-to-pregnant-women (29.1%) and bidirectional (34.4%) forms were equally common. Among couples with psychological IPV, pregnant-woman-to-partner (54.9%) and partner-to-pregnant-woman (39.6%) IPV were more common than bidirectional IPV (5.5%). DISCUSSION:The prevalence of violence was markedly higher in this study compared with previous reports from the Nordic region and highlights a previous oversight of a substantial and clinically significant level of pregnant-woman-to-partner IPV-as well as the reverse. Data from this study call for IPV to be addressed in universally offered parent preparation programs.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T03:41:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-db9a7b64a4c140d29556597eee7ba978
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T03:41:15Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-db9a7b64a4c140d29556597eee7ba9782022-12-21T19:17:12ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-011410e022382410.1371/journal.pone.0223824The prevalence of intimate partner violence among couples signing up for universally offered parent preparation.Tea L TrillingsgaardHanne N FentzMarianne SimonsenRichard E HeymanBACKGROUND:Intimate partner violence (IPV) during pregnancy can have serious health consequences for mothers and the unborn child. Nevertheless, IPV is seldom addressed in the context of parent preparation. AIM:This study aimed to map the prevalence, direction, and severity of IPV in a sample of expectant couples signing up for universally-offered parent preparation. METHOD:A total of 1726 Danish couples expecting their first child provided data on physical and psychological IPV by completing the Family Maltreatment measure during the second trimester of pregnancy. RESULTS:In 18.5% of the couples, at least one partner reported psychological or physical IPV acts during the past year. In more than 8% of couples, one or both partners reported acts and impacts above the ICD-11 threshold for clinically-significant IPV (CS-IPV) during the past year (3.6% physical CS-IPV, 5.3% psychological CS-IPV, and 0.8% both physical and psychological CS-IPV). Among couples with physical IPV below the clinical threshold, pregnant-woman-to-partner (50%) and bidirectional (38.2%) IPV were more common than partner-to-pregnant-woman IPV (11.8%). Among couples with physical CS-IPV, pregnant-woman-to-partner (36.1%), partner-to-pregnant-women (29.1%) and bidirectional (34.4%) forms were equally common. Among couples with psychological IPV, pregnant-woman-to-partner (54.9%) and partner-to-pregnant-woman (39.6%) IPV were more common than bidirectional IPV (5.5%). DISCUSSION:The prevalence of violence was markedly higher in this study compared with previous reports from the Nordic region and highlights a previous oversight of a substantial and clinically significant level of pregnant-woman-to-partner IPV-as well as the reverse. Data from this study call for IPV to be addressed in universally offered parent preparation programs.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223824
spellingShingle Tea L Trillingsgaard
Hanne N Fentz
Marianne Simonsen
Richard E Heyman
The prevalence of intimate partner violence among couples signing up for universally offered parent preparation.
PLoS ONE
title The prevalence of intimate partner violence among couples signing up for universally offered parent preparation.
title_full The prevalence of intimate partner violence among couples signing up for universally offered parent preparation.
title_fullStr The prevalence of intimate partner violence among couples signing up for universally offered parent preparation.
title_full_unstemmed The prevalence of intimate partner violence among couples signing up for universally offered parent preparation.
title_short The prevalence of intimate partner violence among couples signing up for universally offered parent preparation.
title_sort prevalence of intimate partner violence among couples signing up for universally offered parent preparation
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223824
work_keys_str_mv AT tealtrillingsgaard theprevalenceofintimatepartnerviolenceamongcouplessigningupforuniversallyofferedparentpreparation
AT hannenfentz theprevalenceofintimatepartnerviolenceamongcouplessigningupforuniversallyofferedparentpreparation
AT mariannesimonsen theprevalenceofintimatepartnerviolenceamongcouplessigningupforuniversallyofferedparentpreparation
AT richardeheyman theprevalenceofintimatepartnerviolenceamongcouplessigningupforuniversallyofferedparentpreparation
AT tealtrillingsgaard prevalenceofintimatepartnerviolenceamongcouplessigningupforuniversallyofferedparentpreparation
AT hannenfentz prevalenceofintimatepartnerviolenceamongcouplessigningupforuniversallyofferedparentpreparation
AT mariannesimonsen prevalenceofintimatepartnerviolenceamongcouplessigningupforuniversallyofferedparentpreparation
AT richardeheyman prevalenceofintimatepartnerviolenceamongcouplessigningupforuniversallyofferedparentpreparation