The association between research funding status and clinical research papers’ citation impact in Japan: A cross-sectional bibliometric study
IntroductionStudies have not sufficiently clarified the differences in citation impact between funded and non-funded clinical research papers. Hence, this study seeks to evaluate the relation between research funding status and clinical research papers’ citation impact in different research fields u...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022-10-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.978174/full |
_version_ | 1797986203871477760 |
---|---|
author | Fumito Morisawa Fumito Morisawa Yuji Nishizaki Yuji Nishizaki Yuji Nishizaki Patrick Devos Naotake Yanagisawa Kotone Matsuyama Kotone Matsuyama Yasuhiro Homma Rieko Ueda Miwa Sekine Miwa Sekine Hiroyuki Daida Hiroyuki Daida Tohru Minamino Shoji Sanada |
author_facet | Fumito Morisawa Fumito Morisawa Yuji Nishizaki Yuji Nishizaki Yuji Nishizaki Patrick Devos Naotake Yanagisawa Kotone Matsuyama Kotone Matsuyama Yasuhiro Homma Rieko Ueda Miwa Sekine Miwa Sekine Hiroyuki Daida Hiroyuki Daida Tohru Minamino Shoji Sanada |
author_sort | Fumito Morisawa |
collection | DOAJ |
description | IntroductionStudies have not sufficiently clarified the differences in citation impact between funded and non-funded clinical research papers. Hence, this study seeks to evaluate the relation between research funding status and clinical research papers’ citation impact in different research fields using multiple evaluation indices.MethodsIn this cross-sectional bibliometric study, clinical research papers published by core clinical research hospitals in Japan were compared retrospectively in terms of times cited (TC), category normalized citation impact (CNCI), citation percentile (CP), journal impact factor (JIF), the Software to Identify, Manage, and Analyze Scientific Publications (SIGAPS) category, and whether they were the funded clinical research. The association between research funding status or the SIGAPS category and CNCI ≥ 2 was analyzed using logistic regression analysis.Results11 core clinical research hospitals published 553 clinical research papers, of which 120 were non-funded and 433 were funded (public institution-funded and industry-funded). The study found that funded clinical research papers (public institution-funded and industry-funded) had significantly higher TC, CNCI, CP, and JIF than non-funded ones [TC: 8 (3–17) vs. 14 (8–31), p < 0.001; CNCI: 0.53 (0.19–0.97) vs. 0.87 (0.45–1.85), p < 0.001; CP: 51.9 (24.48–70.42) vs. 66.7 (40.53–88.01), p < 0.001; JIF: 2.59 (1.90–3.84) vs. 2.93 (2.09–4.20) p = 0.008], while the proportion of A or B rank clinical research papers of the SIGAPS category was not significantly different between the two groups (30.0 vs. 34.9%, p = 0.318). In the logistic regression analysis, having a CNCI ≥ 2 was significantly associated with research funding (public institution-funded and industry-funded) and publication in A or B rank journals of the SIGAPS category [research funding: Estimate 2.169, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.153–4.083, p = 0.016; SIGAPS category A/B: Estimate 6.126, 95% CI 3.889–9.651, p < 0.001].ConclusionAnalysis via multiple indicators including CNCI and the SIGAPS category, which allows for a comparison of the papers’ citation impact in different research fields, found a positive relation between research funding status and the citation impact of clinical research papers. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T07:30:15Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-dba04bbe03504ca48ecd3803efe130b9 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2296-858X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T07:30:15Z |
publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Medicine |
spelling | doaj.art-dba04bbe03504ca48ecd3803efe130b92022-12-22T04:36:57ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Medicine2296-858X2022-10-01910.3389/fmed.2022.978174978174The association between research funding status and clinical research papers’ citation impact in Japan: A cross-sectional bibliometric studyFumito Morisawa0Fumito Morisawa1Yuji Nishizaki2Yuji Nishizaki3Yuji Nishizaki4Patrick Devos5Naotake Yanagisawa6Kotone Matsuyama7Kotone Matsuyama8Yasuhiro Homma9Rieko Ueda10Miwa Sekine11Miwa Sekine12Hiroyuki Daida13Hiroyuki Daida14Tohru Minamino15Shoji Sanada16Department of Cardiovascular Biology and Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanRare Disease Medical Affairs, Pfizer Japan Inc., Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Cardiovascular Biology and Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanDivision of Medical Education, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanMedical Technology Innovation Center, Juntendo University, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Lillometrics, University of Lille, CHU Lille, Lille, FranceMedical Technology Innovation Center, Juntendo University, Tokyo, JapanCenter for Strategic Research Initiative, Nippon Medical School Foundation, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanMedical Technology Innovation Center, Juntendo University, Tokyo, JapanDivision of Medical Education, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanMedical Technology Innovation Center, Juntendo University, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Cardiovascular Biology and Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanFaculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Cardiovascular Biology and Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan0Clinical and Translational Research Center, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, JapanIntroductionStudies have not sufficiently clarified the differences in citation impact between funded and non-funded clinical research papers. Hence, this study seeks to evaluate the relation between research funding status and clinical research papers’ citation impact in different research fields using multiple evaluation indices.MethodsIn this cross-sectional bibliometric study, clinical research papers published by core clinical research hospitals in Japan were compared retrospectively in terms of times cited (TC), category normalized citation impact (CNCI), citation percentile (CP), journal impact factor (JIF), the Software to Identify, Manage, and Analyze Scientific Publications (SIGAPS) category, and whether they were the funded clinical research. The association between research funding status or the SIGAPS category and CNCI ≥ 2 was analyzed using logistic regression analysis.Results11 core clinical research hospitals published 553 clinical research papers, of which 120 were non-funded and 433 were funded (public institution-funded and industry-funded). The study found that funded clinical research papers (public institution-funded and industry-funded) had significantly higher TC, CNCI, CP, and JIF than non-funded ones [TC: 8 (3–17) vs. 14 (8–31), p < 0.001; CNCI: 0.53 (0.19–0.97) vs. 0.87 (0.45–1.85), p < 0.001; CP: 51.9 (24.48–70.42) vs. 66.7 (40.53–88.01), p < 0.001; JIF: 2.59 (1.90–3.84) vs. 2.93 (2.09–4.20) p = 0.008], while the proportion of A or B rank clinical research papers of the SIGAPS category was not significantly different between the two groups (30.0 vs. 34.9%, p = 0.318). In the logistic regression analysis, having a CNCI ≥ 2 was significantly associated with research funding (public institution-funded and industry-funded) and publication in A or B rank journals of the SIGAPS category [research funding: Estimate 2.169, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.153–4.083, p = 0.016; SIGAPS category A/B: Estimate 6.126, 95% CI 3.889–9.651, p < 0.001].ConclusionAnalysis via multiple indicators including CNCI and the SIGAPS category, which allows for a comparison of the papers’ citation impact in different research fields, found a positive relation between research funding status and the citation impact of clinical research papers.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.978174/fullclinical researchresearch fundingcitation impactSIGAPScategory normalized citation impactbibliometrics |
spellingShingle | Fumito Morisawa Fumito Morisawa Yuji Nishizaki Yuji Nishizaki Yuji Nishizaki Patrick Devos Naotake Yanagisawa Kotone Matsuyama Kotone Matsuyama Yasuhiro Homma Rieko Ueda Miwa Sekine Miwa Sekine Hiroyuki Daida Hiroyuki Daida Tohru Minamino Shoji Sanada The association between research funding status and clinical research papers’ citation impact in Japan: A cross-sectional bibliometric study Frontiers in Medicine clinical research research funding citation impact SIGAPS category normalized citation impact bibliometrics |
title | The association between research funding status and clinical research papers’ citation impact in Japan: A cross-sectional bibliometric study |
title_full | The association between research funding status and clinical research papers’ citation impact in Japan: A cross-sectional bibliometric study |
title_fullStr | The association between research funding status and clinical research papers’ citation impact in Japan: A cross-sectional bibliometric study |
title_full_unstemmed | The association between research funding status and clinical research papers’ citation impact in Japan: A cross-sectional bibliometric study |
title_short | The association between research funding status and clinical research papers’ citation impact in Japan: A cross-sectional bibliometric study |
title_sort | association between research funding status and clinical research papers citation impact in japan a cross sectional bibliometric study |
topic | clinical research research funding citation impact SIGAPS category normalized citation impact bibliometrics |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.978174/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fumitomorisawa theassociationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT fumitomorisawa theassociationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT yujinishizaki theassociationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT yujinishizaki theassociationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT yujinishizaki theassociationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT patrickdevos theassociationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT naotakeyanagisawa theassociationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT kotonematsuyama theassociationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT kotonematsuyama theassociationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT yasuhirohomma theassociationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT riekoueda theassociationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT miwasekine theassociationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT miwasekine theassociationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT hiroyukidaida theassociationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT hiroyukidaida theassociationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT tohruminamino theassociationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT shojisanada theassociationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT fumitomorisawa associationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT fumitomorisawa associationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT yujinishizaki associationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT yujinishizaki associationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT yujinishizaki associationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT patrickdevos associationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT naotakeyanagisawa associationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT kotonematsuyama associationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT kotonematsuyama associationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT yasuhirohomma associationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT riekoueda associationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT miwasekine associationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT miwasekine associationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT hiroyukidaida associationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT hiroyukidaida associationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT tohruminamino associationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy AT shojisanada associationbetweenresearchfundingstatusandclinicalresearchpaperscitationimpactinjapanacrosssectionalbibliometricstudy |