Flowering and Runnering of Seasonal Strawberry under Different Photoperiods Are Affected by Intensity of Supplemental or Night-Interrupting Blue Light
The strawberry (<i>Fragaria × ananassa</i> Duch.) “Sulhyang” is a typical seasonal flowering (SF) strawberry that produces flower buds in day lengths shorter than a critical limit (variable, but often defined as <12 h). There is a trade-off between photoperiod-controlled flowering and...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | Plants |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/13/3/375 |
| _version_ | 1797318351863676928 |
|---|---|
| author | Jingli Yang Jinnan Song Byoung Ryong Jeong |
| author_facet | Jingli Yang Jinnan Song Byoung Ryong Jeong |
| author_sort | Jingli Yang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The strawberry (<i>Fragaria × ananassa</i> Duch.) “Sulhyang” is a typical seasonal flowering (SF) strawberry that produces flower buds in day lengths shorter than a critical limit (variable, but often defined as <12 h). There is a trade-off between photoperiod-controlled flowering and gibberellin (GA) signaling pathway-mediated runnering. Some related genes (such as <i>CO</i>, <i>FT1</i>, <i>SOC1</i>, and <i>TFL1</i>) participating in light signaling and circadian rhythm in plants are altered under blue light (BL). Sugars for flowering and runnering are mainly produced by photosynthetic carbon assimilation. The intensity of light could affect photosynthesis, thereby regulating flowering and runnering. Here, we investigated the effect of the intensity of supplemental blue light (S-BL) or night-interrupting blue light (NI-BL) in photoperiodic flowering and runnering regulation by applying 4 h of S-BL or NI-BL with either 0, 10, 20, 30, or 40 μmol·m<sup>−2</sup>·s<sup>−1</sup> photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) in a 10 h short-day (SD10) (SD10 + S-BL4 or + NI-BL4 (0, 10, 20, 30, or 40)) or 14 h long-day (LD14) conditions (LD14 + S-BL4 or + NI-BL4 (0, 10, 20, 30, or 40)). Approximately 45 days after the photoperiodic light treatment, generally, whether S-BL or NI-BL, BL (20) was the most promotive in runnering, leading to more runners in both the LD and SD conditions. For flowering, except the treatment LD14 + S-BL, BL (20) was still the key light, either from BL (20) or BL (40), promoting flowering, especially when BL acted as the night-interrupting light, regardless of the photoperiod. At the harvest stage, larger numbers of inflorescences and runners were observed in the LD14 + NI-BL4 treatment, and the most were observed in the LD14 + NI-BL (20). Moreover, the SD10 + NI-BL4 was slightly inferior to the LD14 + NI-BL4 in increasing the numbers of inflorescences and runners, but it caused earlier flowering. Additionally, the circadian rhythm expression of flowering-related genes was affected differently by the S-BL and NI-BL. After the application of BL in LD conditions, the expression of an LD-specific floral activator <i>FaFT1</i> was stimulated, while that of a flowering suppressor <i>FaTFL1</i> was inhibited, resetting the balance of expression between these two opposite flowering regulators. The SD runnering was caused by BL in non-runnering SD conditions associated with the stimulation of two key genes that regulate runner formation in the GA pathway, <i>FaGRAS32</i> and <i>FaGA20ox4</i>. In addition, the positive effects of BL on enhancing photosynthesis and carbohydrate production also provided an abundant energy supply for the flowering and runnering processes. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T03:51:09Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-dba27f497d924a55a9a936269ae6abf0 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2223-7747 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T03:51:09Z |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Plants |
| spelling | doaj.art-dba27f497d924a55a9a936269ae6abf02024-02-09T15:20:15ZengMDPI AGPlants2223-77472024-01-0113337510.3390/plants13030375Flowering and Runnering of Seasonal Strawberry under Different Photoperiods Are Affected by Intensity of Supplemental or Night-Interrupting Blue LightJingli Yang0Jinnan Song1Byoung Ryong Jeong2Shandong Provincial University Laboratory for Protected Horticulture, Weifang University of Science and Technology, Shouguang 262700, ChinaShandong Provincial University Laboratory for Protected Horticulture, Weifang University of Science and Technology, Shouguang 262700, ChinaDepartment of Horticulture, Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Graduate School, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of KoreaThe strawberry (<i>Fragaria × ananassa</i> Duch.) “Sulhyang” is a typical seasonal flowering (SF) strawberry that produces flower buds in day lengths shorter than a critical limit (variable, but often defined as <12 h). There is a trade-off between photoperiod-controlled flowering and gibberellin (GA) signaling pathway-mediated runnering. Some related genes (such as <i>CO</i>, <i>FT1</i>, <i>SOC1</i>, and <i>TFL1</i>) participating in light signaling and circadian rhythm in plants are altered under blue light (BL). Sugars for flowering and runnering are mainly produced by photosynthetic carbon assimilation. The intensity of light could affect photosynthesis, thereby regulating flowering and runnering. Here, we investigated the effect of the intensity of supplemental blue light (S-BL) or night-interrupting blue light (NI-BL) in photoperiodic flowering and runnering regulation by applying 4 h of S-BL or NI-BL with either 0, 10, 20, 30, or 40 μmol·m<sup>−2</sup>·s<sup>−1</sup> photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) in a 10 h short-day (SD10) (SD10 + S-BL4 or + NI-BL4 (0, 10, 20, 30, or 40)) or 14 h long-day (LD14) conditions (LD14 + S-BL4 or + NI-BL4 (0, 10, 20, 30, or 40)). Approximately 45 days after the photoperiodic light treatment, generally, whether S-BL or NI-BL, BL (20) was the most promotive in runnering, leading to more runners in both the LD and SD conditions. For flowering, except the treatment LD14 + S-BL, BL (20) was still the key light, either from BL (20) or BL (40), promoting flowering, especially when BL acted as the night-interrupting light, regardless of the photoperiod. At the harvest stage, larger numbers of inflorescences and runners were observed in the LD14 + NI-BL4 treatment, and the most were observed in the LD14 + NI-BL (20). Moreover, the SD10 + NI-BL4 was slightly inferior to the LD14 + NI-BL4 in increasing the numbers of inflorescences and runners, but it caused earlier flowering. Additionally, the circadian rhythm expression of flowering-related genes was affected differently by the S-BL and NI-BL. After the application of BL in LD conditions, the expression of an LD-specific floral activator <i>FaFT1</i> was stimulated, while that of a flowering suppressor <i>FaTFL1</i> was inhibited, resetting the balance of expression between these two opposite flowering regulators. The SD runnering was caused by BL in non-runnering SD conditions associated with the stimulation of two key genes that regulate runner formation in the GA pathway, <i>FaGRAS32</i> and <i>FaGA20ox4</i>. In addition, the positive effects of BL on enhancing photosynthesis and carbohydrate production also provided an abundant energy supply for the flowering and runnering processes.https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/13/3/375carbohydrate accumulationcircadian rhythmGA pathwaylight intensityphotoperiodic responsephotosynthetic efficiency |
| spellingShingle | Jingli Yang Jinnan Song Byoung Ryong Jeong Flowering and Runnering of Seasonal Strawberry under Different Photoperiods Are Affected by Intensity of Supplemental or Night-Interrupting Blue Light Plants carbohydrate accumulation circadian rhythm GA pathway light intensity photoperiodic response photosynthetic efficiency |
| title | Flowering and Runnering of Seasonal Strawberry under Different Photoperiods Are Affected by Intensity of Supplemental or Night-Interrupting Blue Light |
| title_full | Flowering and Runnering of Seasonal Strawberry under Different Photoperiods Are Affected by Intensity of Supplemental or Night-Interrupting Blue Light |
| title_fullStr | Flowering and Runnering of Seasonal Strawberry under Different Photoperiods Are Affected by Intensity of Supplemental or Night-Interrupting Blue Light |
| title_full_unstemmed | Flowering and Runnering of Seasonal Strawberry under Different Photoperiods Are Affected by Intensity of Supplemental or Night-Interrupting Blue Light |
| title_short | Flowering and Runnering of Seasonal Strawberry under Different Photoperiods Are Affected by Intensity of Supplemental or Night-Interrupting Blue Light |
| title_sort | flowering and runnering of seasonal strawberry under different photoperiods are affected by intensity of supplemental or night interrupting blue light |
| topic | carbohydrate accumulation circadian rhythm GA pathway light intensity photoperiodic response photosynthetic efficiency |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/13/3/375 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jingliyang floweringandrunneringofseasonalstrawberryunderdifferentphotoperiodsareaffectedbyintensityofsupplementalornightinterruptingbluelight AT jinnansong floweringandrunneringofseasonalstrawberryunderdifferentphotoperiodsareaffectedbyintensityofsupplementalornightinterruptingbluelight AT byoungryongjeong floweringandrunneringofseasonalstrawberryunderdifferentphotoperiodsareaffectedbyintensityofsupplementalornightinterruptingbluelight |