On the inversion number of oriented graphs

Let $D$ be an oriented graph. The inversion of a set $X$ of vertices in $D$ consists in reversing the direction of all arcs with both ends in $X$. The inversion number of $D$, denoted by ${\rm inv}(D)$, is the minimum number of inversions needed to make $D$ acyclic. Denoting by $\tau(D)$, $\tau'...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jørgen Bang-Jensen, Jonas Costa Ferreira da Silva, Frédéric Havet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science 2022-12-01
Series:Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dmtcs.episciences.org/7474/pdf
_version_ 1797270039651418112
author Jørgen Bang-Jensen
Jonas Costa Ferreira da Silva
Frédéric Havet
author_facet Jørgen Bang-Jensen
Jonas Costa Ferreira da Silva
Frédéric Havet
author_sort Jørgen Bang-Jensen
collection DOAJ
description Let $D$ be an oriented graph. The inversion of a set $X$ of vertices in $D$ consists in reversing the direction of all arcs with both ends in $X$. The inversion number of $D$, denoted by ${\rm inv}(D)$, is the minimum number of inversions needed to make $D$ acyclic. Denoting by $\tau(D)$, $\tau' (D)$, and $\nu(D)$ the cycle transversal number, the cycle arc-transversal number and the cycle packing number of $D$ respectively, one shows that ${\rm inv}(D) \leq \tau' (D)$, ${\rm inv}(D) \leq 2\tau(D)$ and there exists a function $g$ such that ${\rm inv}(D)\leq g(\nu(D))$. We conjecture that for any two oriented graphs $L$ and $R$, ${\rm inv}(L\rightarrow R) ={\rm inv}(L) +{\rm inv}(R)$ where $L\rightarrow R$ is the dijoin of $L$ and $R$. This would imply that the first two inequalities are tight. We prove this conjecture when ${\rm inv}(L)\leq 1$ and ${\rm inv}(R)\leq 2$ and when ${\rm inv}(L) ={\rm inv}(R)=2$ and $L$ and $R$ are strongly connected. We also show that the function $g$ of the third inequality satisfies $g(1)\leq 4$. We then consider the complexity of deciding whether ${\rm inv}(D)\leq k$ for a given oriented graph $D$. We show that it is NP-complete for $k=1$, which together with the above conjecture would imply that it is NP-complete for every $k$. This contrasts with a result of Belkhechine et al. which states that deciding whether ${\rm inv}(T)\leq k$ for a given tournament $T$ is polynomial-time solvable.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T21:32:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dbaca9b369f14138ae0a93b3ebda0361
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1365-8050
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-25T01:57:56Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science
record_format Article
series Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science
spelling doaj.art-dbaca9b369f14138ae0a93b3ebda03612024-03-07T15:44:44ZengDiscrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer ScienceDiscrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science1365-80502022-12-01vol. 23 no. 2, special issue...Special issues10.46298/dmtcs.74747474On the inversion number of oriented graphsJørgen Bang-JensenJonas Costa Ferreira da SilvaFrédéric HavetLet $D$ be an oriented graph. The inversion of a set $X$ of vertices in $D$ consists in reversing the direction of all arcs with both ends in $X$. The inversion number of $D$, denoted by ${\rm inv}(D)$, is the minimum number of inversions needed to make $D$ acyclic. Denoting by $\tau(D)$, $\tau' (D)$, and $\nu(D)$ the cycle transversal number, the cycle arc-transversal number and the cycle packing number of $D$ respectively, one shows that ${\rm inv}(D) \leq \tau' (D)$, ${\rm inv}(D) \leq 2\tau(D)$ and there exists a function $g$ such that ${\rm inv}(D)\leq g(\nu(D))$. We conjecture that for any two oriented graphs $L$ and $R$, ${\rm inv}(L\rightarrow R) ={\rm inv}(L) +{\rm inv}(R)$ where $L\rightarrow R$ is the dijoin of $L$ and $R$. This would imply that the first two inequalities are tight. We prove this conjecture when ${\rm inv}(L)\leq 1$ and ${\rm inv}(R)\leq 2$ and when ${\rm inv}(L) ={\rm inv}(R)=2$ and $L$ and $R$ are strongly connected. We also show that the function $g$ of the third inequality satisfies $g(1)\leq 4$. We then consider the complexity of deciding whether ${\rm inv}(D)\leq k$ for a given oriented graph $D$. We show that it is NP-complete for $k=1$, which together with the above conjecture would imply that it is NP-complete for every $k$. This contrasts with a result of Belkhechine et al. which states that deciding whether ${\rm inv}(T)\leq k$ for a given tournament $T$ is polynomial-time solvable.https://dmtcs.episciences.org/7474/pdfmathematics - combinatoricscomputer science - discrete mathematics
spellingShingle Jørgen Bang-Jensen
Jonas Costa Ferreira da Silva
Frédéric Havet
On the inversion number of oriented graphs
Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science
mathematics - combinatorics
computer science - discrete mathematics
title On the inversion number of oriented graphs
title_full On the inversion number of oriented graphs
title_fullStr On the inversion number of oriented graphs
title_full_unstemmed On the inversion number of oriented graphs
title_short On the inversion number of oriented graphs
title_sort on the inversion number of oriented graphs
topic mathematics - combinatorics
computer science - discrete mathematics
url https://dmtcs.episciences.org/7474/pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jørgenbangjensen ontheinversionnumberoforientedgraphs
AT jonascostaferreiradasilva ontheinversionnumberoforientedgraphs
AT frederichavet ontheinversionnumberoforientedgraphs