Effect of Streptomyces probiotics on the gut microbiota of Litopenaeus vannamei challenged with Vibrio parahaemolyticus

Abstract This study assessed the intestinal microbiota of juveniles of the White shrimp Litopenaus vannamei, whose feed was enriched with three probiotic formulations: Streptomyces sp. RL8 (RL8); a mix of Lactobacillus graminis and Streptomyces spp. RL8 and N7 (Lac‐Strep); and a mix of Bacillus spp....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: José Manuel Mazón‐Suástegui, Joan Sebastian Salas‐Leiva, Ricardo Medina‐Marrero, Ricardo Medina‐García, Milagro García‐Bernal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-02-01
Series:MicrobiologyOpen
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.967
_version_ 1818136939127111680
author José Manuel Mazón‐Suástegui
Joan Sebastian Salas‐Leiva
Ricardo Medina‐Marrero
Ricardo Medina‐García
Milagro García‐Bernal
author_facet José Manuel Mazón‐Suástegui
Joan Sebastian Salas‐Leiva
Ricardo Medina‐Marrero
Ricardo Medina‐García
Milagro García‐Bernal
author_sort José Manuel Mazón‐Suástegui
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This study assessed the intestinal microbiota of juveniles of the White shrimp Litopenaus vannamei, whose feed was enriched with three probiotic formulations: Streptomyces sp. RL8 (RL8); a mix of Lactobacillus graminis and Streptomyces spp. RL8 and N7 (Lac‐Strep); and a mix of Bacillus spp. and Streptomyces spp. RL8 and N7 (Bac‐Strep). The analysis was performed by sequencing the V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene of treated animals and the control group before and after Vibrio parahaemolyticus challenge. After challenge, the highest Shannon diversity indexes corresponded to RL8 and Bac‐Strep (3.94 ± 0.11 and 3.39 ± 0.3, respectively) and the lowest to the control group (2.58 ± 0.26). The most abundant phyla before and after challenge were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes. The principal component analysis and Statistical Analysis of Metagenomic Profiles (STAMP) showed that the gut microbiota of the groups RL8 and Bac‐Strep after challenge was different from the other experimental groups, which was characterized by a higher bacterial diversity, as well as a significant stimulation of the Bacteriovorax population and other antimicrobial producing genera that protected shrimp from infection.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T09:48:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dbc793cd75d8489099e95cf5b0571bff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-8827
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T09:48:22Z
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series MicrobiologyOpen
spelling doaj.art-dbc793cd75d8489099e95cf5b0571bff2022-12-22T01:12:28ZengWileyMicrobiologyOpen2045-88272020-02-0192n/an/a10.1002/mbo3.967Effect of Streptomyces probiotics on the gut microbiota of Litopenaeus vannamei challenged with Vibrio parahaemolyticusJosé Manuel Mazón‐Suástegui0Joan Sebastian Salas‐Leiva1Ricardo Medina‐Marrero2Ricardo Medina‐García3Milagro García‐Bernal4Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste (CIBNOR) La Paz B.C.S MéxicoCátedra‐CONACyT Departamento de Medio Ambiente y Energía Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados Chihuahua MéxicoCentro de Bioactivos Químicos Universidad Central de Las Villas Santa Clara Villa Clara CubaFacultad de Química‐Farmacia Universidad Central de Las Villas Santa Clara Villa Clara CubaCentro de Bioactivos Químicos Universidad Central de Las Villas Santa Clara Villa Clara CubaAbstract This study assessed the intestinal microbiota of juveniles of the White shrimp Litopenaus vannamei, whose feed was enriched with three probiotic formulations: Streptomyces sp. RL8 (RL8); a mix of Lactobacillus graminis and Streptomyces spp. RL8 and N7 (Lac‐Strep); and a mix of Bacillus spp. and Streptomyces spp. RL8 and N7 (Bac‐Strep). The analysis was performed by sequencing the V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene of treated animals and the control group before and after Vibrio parahaemolyticus challenge. After challenge, the highest Shannon diversity indexes corresponded to RL8 and Bac‐Strep (3.94 ± 0.11 and 3.39 ± 0.3, respectively) and the lowest to the control group (2.58 ± 0.26). The most abundant phyla before and after challenge were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes. The principal component analysis and Statistical Analysis of Metagenomic Profiles (STAMP) showed that the gut microbiota of the groups RL8 and Bac‐Strep after challenge was different from the other experimental groups, which was characterized by a higher bacterial diversity, as well as a significant stimulation of the Bacteriovorax population and other antimicrobial producing genera that protected shrimp from infection.https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.967BacteriovoraxLitopenaus vannameiMicrobiomeStreptomycesVibrio
spellingShingle José Manuel Mazón‐Suástegui
Joan Sebastian Salas‐Leiva
Ricardo Medina‐Marrero
Ricardo Medina‐García
Milagro García‐Bernal
Effect of Streptomyces probiotics on the gut microbiota of Litopenaeus vannamei challenged with Vibrio parahaemolyticus
MicrobiologyOpen
Bacteriovorax
Litopenaus vannamei
Microbiome
Streptomyces
Vibrio
title Effect of Streptomyces probiotics on the gut microbiota of Litopenaeus vannamei challenged with Vibrio parahaemolyticus
title_full Effect of Streptomyces probiotics on the gut microbiota of Litopenaeus vannamei challenged with Vibrio parahaemolyticus
title_fullStr Effect of Streptomyces probiotics on the gut microbiota of Litopenaeus vannamei challenged with Vibrio parahaemolyticus
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Streptomyces probiotics on the gut microbiota of Litopenaeus vannamei challenged with Vibrio parahaemolyticus
title_short Effect of Streptomyces probiotics on the gut microbiota of Litopenaeus vannamei challenged with Vibrio parahaemolyticus
title_sort effect of streptomyces probiotics on the gut microbiota of litopenaeus vannamei challenged with vibrio parahaemolyticus
topic Bacteriovorax
Litopenaus vannamei
Microbiome
Streptomyces
Vibrio
url https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.967
work_keys_str_mv AT josemanuelmazonsuastegui effectofstreptomycesprobioticsonthegutmicrobiotaoflitopenaeusvannameichallengedwithvibrioparahaemolyticus
AT joansebastiansalasleiva effectofstreptomycesprobioticsonthegutmicrobiotaoflitopenaeusvannameichallengedwithvibrioparahaemolyticus
AT ricardomedinamarrero effectofstreptomycesprobioticsonthegutmicrobiotaoflitopenaeusvannameichallengedwithvibrioparahaemolyticus
AT ricardomedinagarcia effectofstreptomycesprobioticsonthegutmicrobiotaoflitopenaeusvannameichallengedwithvibrioparahaemolyticus
AT milagrogarciabernal effectofstreptomycesprobioticsonthegutmicrobiotaoflitopenaeusvannameichallengedwithvibrioparahaemolyticus