Performance of Tablet Splitters, Crushers, and Grinders in Relation to Personalised Medication with Tablets

Swallowing problems and the required dose adaptations needed to obtain optimal pharmacotherapy may be a hurdle in the use of tablets in daily clinical practice. Tablet splitting, crushing, or grinding is often applied to personalise medication, especially for the elderly and children. In this study,...

全面介绍

书目详细资料
Main Authors: Herman J. Woerdenbag, J. Carolina Visser, Marlyn P. A. M. Leferink op Reinink, Roël R. van Orsoy, Anko C. Eissens, Paul Hagedoorn, Hilda Dijkstra, Derk P. Allersma, Shi W. Ng, Oscar S. N. M. Smeets, Henderik W. Frijlink
格式: 文件
语言:English
出版: MDPI AG 2022-01-01
丛编:Pharmaceutics
主题:
在线阅读:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/14/2/320
_version_ 1827653323267768320
author Herman J. Woerdenbag
J. Carolina Visser
Marlyn P. A. M. Leferink op Reinink
Roël R. van Orsoy
Anko C. Eissens
Paul Hagedoorn
Hilda Dijkstra
Derk P. Allersma
Shi W. Ng
Oscar S. N. M. Smeets
Henderik W. Frijlink
author_facet Herman J. Woerdenbag
J. Carolina Visser
Marlyn P. A. M. Leferink op Reinink
Roël R. van Orsoy
Anko C. Eissens
Paul Hagedoorn
Hilda Dijkstra
Derk P. Allersma
Shi W. Ng
Oscar S. N. M. Smeets
Henderik W. Frijlink
author_sort Herman J. Woerdenbag
collection DOAJ
description Swallowing problems and the required dose adaptations needed to obtain optimal pharmacotherapy may be a hurdle in the use of tablets in daily clinical practice. Tablet splitting, crushing, or grinding is often applied to personalise medication, especially for the elderly and children. In this study, the performance of different types of (commercially available) devices was studied. Included were splitters, screwcap crushers, manual grinders, and electric grinders. Unscored tablets without active ingredient were prepared, with a diameter of 9 and 13 mm and a hardness of 100–220 N. Tablets were split into two parts and the difference in weight was measured. The time needed to pulverise the tablets (crush time) was recorded. The residue remaining in the device (loss) was measured. The powder was sieved to obtain a particle fraction >600 µm and <600 µm. The median particle size and particle size distribution of the later fraction were determined using laser diffraction analysis. Splitting tablets into two equal parts appeared to be difficult with the devices tested. Most screwcap grinders yielded a coarse powder containing larger chunks. Manual and especially electric grinders produced a finer powder, making it suitable for administration via an enteral feeding tube as well as for use in individualised preparations such as capsules. In conclusion, for domestic and incidental use, a screwcap crusher may provide sufficient size reduction, while for the more demanding regular use in hospitals and nursing residences, a manual or electric grinder is preferred.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T21:15:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dbd3414b4f1148b4a0ffc85df18a027f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4923
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T21:15:23Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Pharmaceutics
spelling doaj.art-dbd3414b4f1148b4a0ffc85df18a027f2023-11-23T21:37:20ZengMDPI AGPharmaceutics1999-49232022-01-0114232010.3390/pharmaceutics14020320Performance of Tablet Splitters, Crushers, and Grinders in Relation to Personalised Medication with TabletsHerman J. Woerdenbag0J. Carolina Visser1Marlyn P. A. M. Leferink op Reinink2Roël R. van Orsoy3Anko C. Eissens4Paul Hagedoorn5Hilda Dijkstra6Derk P. Allersma7Shi W. Ng8Oscar S. N. M. Smeets9Henderik W. Frijlink10Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The NetherlandsRoyal Dutch Pharmacists Association (KNMP), Alexanderstraat 11, 2514 JL The Hague, The NetherlandsRoyal Dutch Pharmacists Association (KNMP), Alexanderstraat 11, 2514 JL The Hague, The NetherlandsDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The NetherlandsSwallowing problems and the required dose adaptations needed to obtain optimal pharmacotherapy may be a hurdle in the use of tablets in daily clinical practice. Tablet splitting, crushing, or grinding is often applied to personalise medication, especially for the elderly and children. In this study, the performance of different types of (commercially available) devices was studied. Included were splitters, screwcap crushers, manual grinders, and electric grinders. Unscored tablets without active ingredient were prepared, with a diameter of 9 and 13 mm and a hardness of 100–220 N. Tablets were split into two parts and the difference in weight was measured. The time needed to pulverise the tablets (crush time) was recorded. The residue remaining in the device (loss) was measured. The powder was sieved to obtain a particle fraction >600 µm and <600 µm. The median particle size and particle size distribution of the later fraction were determined using laser diffraction analysis. Splitting tablets into two equal parts appeared to be difficult with the devices tested. Most screwcap grinders yielded a coarse powder containing larger chunks. Manual and especially electric grinders produced a finer powder, making it suitable for administration via an enteral feeding tube as well as for use in individualised preparations such as capsules. In conclusion, for domestic and incidental use, a screwcap crusher may provide sufficient size reduction, while for the more demanding regular use in hospitals and nursing residences, a manual or electric grinder is preferred.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/14/2/320oral solid dosage formstablet splittingtablet crushingtablet grindingpersonalised medicineswallowing problems
spellingShingle Herman J. Woerdenbag
J. Carolina Visser
Marlyn P. A. M. Leferink op Reinink
Roël R. van Orsoy
Anko C. Eissens
Paul Hagedoorn
Hilda Dijkstra
Derk P. Allersma
Shi W. Ng
Oscar S. N. M. Smeets
Henderik W. Frijlink
Performance of Tablet Splitters, Crushers, and Grinders in Relation to Personalised Medication with Tablets
Pharmaceutics
oral solid dosage forms
tablet splitting
tablet crushing
tablet grinding
personalised medicine
swallowing problems
title Performance of Tablet Splitters, Crushers, and Grinders in Relation to Personalised Medication with Tablets
title_full Performance of Tablet Splitters, Crushers, and Grinders in Relation to Personalised Medication with Tablets
title_fullStr Performance of Tablet Splitters, Crushers, and Grinders in Relation to Personalised Medication with Tablets
title_full_unstemmed Performance of Tablet Splitters, Crushers, and Grinders in Relation to Personalised Medication with Tablets
title_short Performance of Tablet Splitters, Crushers, and Grinders in Relation to Personalised Medication with Tablets
title_sort performance of tablet splitters crushers and grinders in relation to personalised medication with tablets
topic oral solid dosage forms
tablet splitting
tablet crushing
tablet grinding
personalised medicine
swallowing problems
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/14/2/320
work_keys_str_mv AT hermanjwoerdenbag performanceoftabletsplitterscrushersandgrindersinrelationtopersonalisedmedicationwithtablets
AT jcarolinavisser performanceoftabletsplitterscrushersandgrindersinrelationtopersonalisedmedicationwithtablets
AT marlynpamleferinkopreinink performanceoftabletsplitterscrushersandgrindersinrelationtopersonalisedmedicationwithtablets
AT roelrvanorsoy performanceoftabletsplitterscrushersandgrindersinrelationtopersonalisedmedicationwithtablets
AT ankoceissens performanceoftabletsplitterscrushersandgrindersinrelationtopersonalisedmedicationwithtablets
AT paulhagedoorn performanceoftabletsplitterscrushersandgrindersinrelationtopersonalisedmedicationwithtablets
AT hildadijkstra performanceoftabletsplitterscrushersandgrindersinrelationtopersonalisedmedicationwithtablets
AT derkpallersma performanceoftabletsplitterscrushersandgrindersinrelationtopersonalisedmedicationwithtablets
AT shiwng performanceoftabletsplitterscrushersandgrindersinrelationtopersonalisedmedicationwithtablets
AT oscarsnmsmeets performanceoftabletsplitterscrushersandgrindersinrelationtopersonalisedmedicationwithtablets
AT henderikwfrijlink performanceoftabletsplitterscrushersandgrindersinrelationtopersonalisedmedicationwithtablets