The Relationship Between Intra-Group Status and Propensity for Conformity in the Process of Forming Group Norms

The question of the relationship between the intragroup status of a group member and the degree of his conformity remains unresolved. Proponents of the idea of "middle-status conformity" tend to view low-status members as weakly susceptible to social influence, while their opponents - the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Valentina Pavlenko
Format: Article
Language:Ukrainian
Published: V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University 2023-12-01
Series:Вісник Харківського національного університету імені В.Н. Каразіна. Серія: Психологія
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicals.karazin.ua/psychology/article/view/22984
_version_ 1797218139381956608
author Valentina Pavlenko
author_facet Valentina Pavlenko
author_sort Valentina Pavlenko
collection DOAJ
description The question of the relationship between the intragroup status of a group member and the degree of his conformity remains unresolved. Proponents of the idea of "middle-status conformity" tend to view low-status members as weakly susceptible to social influence, while their opponents - the most conforming part of the group. An experimental study of this problem became the purpose of this article. 74 students of the 4th senior (8-11) grades took part in it. The following methods were used: a specially designed experiment to study the process of formation of group norms, sociometry and referentometry. The obtained results did not confirm the idea of middle status conformity. At the same time, the hypothesis of the existence of a significant negative relationship between intragroup status and susceptibility to group influence was confirmed. Leaders are characterized by stability of opinion and immutability of position, while low-status members are characterized by pronounced fluctuations in assessments and opinions. It is shown that with age, the revealed relationship between in-group status and the degree of susceptibility to social influence increases. The conclusions drawn are limited to natural, long-established and well-structured groups; physical characteristics in a situation of uncertainty as an object of assessment; definition of intragroup status as a combination of sociometric status with referentiality; conforming behavior in the form of internalization.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T12:13:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dbe476f0f22949a39b34efbec094b932
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2225-7756
2524-2512
language Ukrainian
last_indexed 2024-04-24T12:13:00Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University
record_format Article
series Вісник Харківського національного університету імені В.Н. Каразіна. Серія: Психологія
spelling doaj.art-dbe476f0f22949a39b34efbec094b9322024-04-08T10:32:48ZukrV. N. Karazin Kharkiv National UniversityВісник Харківського національного університету імені В.Н. Каразіна. Серія: Психологія2225-77562524-25122023-12-01755510.26565/2225-7756-2023-75-0522984The Relationship Between Intra-Group Status and Propensity for Conformity in the Process of Forming Group NormsValentina Pavlenko0Department of Applied Psychology, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, UkraineThe question of the relationship between the intragroup status of a group member and the degree of his conformity remains unresolved. Proponents of the idea of "middle-status conformity" tend to view low-status members as weakly susceptible to social influence, while their opponents - the most conforming part of the group. An experimental study of this problem became the purpose of this article. 74 students of the 4th senior (8-11) grades took part in it. The following methods were used: a specially designed experiment to study the process of formation of group norms, sociometry and referentometry. The obtained results did not confirm the idea of middle status conformity. At the same time, the hypothesis of the existence of a significant negative relationship between intragroup status and susceptibility to group influence was confirmed. Leaders are characterized by stability of opinion and immutability of position, while low-status members are characterized by pronounced fluctuations in assessments and opinions. It is shown that with age, the revealed relationship between in-group status and the degree of susceptibility to social influence increases. The conclusions drawn are limited to natural, long-established and well-structured groups; physical characteristics in a situation of uncertainty as an object of assessment; definition of intragroup status as a combination of sociometric status with referentiality; conforming behavior in the form of internalization.https://periodicals.karazin.ua/psychology/article/view/22984conformismstatusgroup normuncertaintyinternalization
spellingShingle Valentina Pavlenko
The Relationship Between Intra-Group Status and Propensity for Conformity in the Process of Forming Group Norms
Вісник Харківського національного університету імені В.Н. Каразіна. Серія: Психологія
conformism
status
group norm
uncertainty
internalization
title The Relationship Between Intra-Group Status and Propensity for Conformity in the Process of Forming Group Norms
title_full The Relationship Between Intra-Group Status and Propensity for Conformity in the Process of Forming Group Norms
title_fullStr The Relationship Between Intra-Group Status and Propensity for Conformity in the Process of Forming Group Norms
title_full_unstemmed The Relationship Between Intra-Group Status and Propensity for Conformity in the Process of Forming Group Norms
title_short The Relationship Between Intra-Group Status and Propensity for Conformity in the Process of Forming Group Norms
title_sort relationship between intra group status and propensity for conformity in the process of forming group norms
topic conformism
status
group norm
uncertainty
internalization
url https://periodicals.karazin.ua/psychology/article/view/22984
work_keys_str_mv AT valentinapavlenko therelationshipbetweenintragroupstatusandpropensityforconformityintheprocessofforminggroupnorms
AT valentinapavlenko relationshipbetweenintragroupstatusandpropensityforconformityintheprocessofforminggroupnorms