Bioequivalence assessment of the two brands of glimepiride tablets

Background/Aim. Glimepiride, as an antidiabetic from the group of sulfonylurea, is administered perorally in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. The aim of this study was to compare pharmacokinetic profiles and relative bioavailabilities of the two oral formulations of glimepiride, generic and innov...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jovanović Dušan, Stojšić Dragan, Zlatković Milica, Jović-Stošić Jasmina, Jovanović Miodrag
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Military Health Department, Ministry of Defance, Serbia 2006-01-01
Series:Vojnosanitetski Pregled
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2006/0042-84500612015J.pdf
_version_ 1811337604545642496
author Jovanović Dušan
Stojšić Dragan
Zlatković Milica
Jović-Stošić Jasmina
Jovanović Miodrag
author_facet Jovanović Dušan
Stojšić Dragan
Zlatković Milica
Jović-Stošić Jasmina
Jovanović Miodrag
author_sort Jovanović Dušan
collection DOAJ
description Background/Aim. Glimepiride, as an antidiabetic from the group of sulfonylurea, is administered perorally in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. The aim of this study was to compare pharmacokinetic profiles and relative bioavailabilities of the two oral formulations of glimepiride, generic and innovator tablets, after a single dose of the active drug. Methods. An oral dose of 6 mg glimepiride was given under fasting conditions to 24 healthy volunteers. A one-week washout period was applied between the two consecutive periods. The serum samples obtained before dosing, and at various time points up to 48 hours, were analyzed for glimepiride concentration using the validated highperformance liquid chromatographic method with ultraviolet detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters representing early (maximal concentration, time to reach maximal concentration) and total exposure (area under the curve from the time 0 to the infinite time) to glimepiride were obtained and further analyzed using the multifactorial analysis of variance and the non-parametric Wilcoxon signed ranks test. Comparison of the secondary kinetic variables was only descriptive. Results. The point estimates of the ratios of geometric means (test/reference) of maximal concentrations and areas under the curve were 1.046 (90% confidence interval: 0.906−1.208) and 1.022 (90% confidence interval: 0.856−1.220), respectively, while the median values of times to reach maximal concentration, at 5% level of significance, did not differ significantly. Both formulations were well tolerated. Transient mild hypoglycaemia, which had been noted in 6 participants, resolved spontaneously within 30−60 minutes. Conclusion. Since all the parametric 90% confidence intervals for the log-transformed main variables of glimepiride were within the 0.80 and 1.25 interval, accepted as the definition of bioequivalence, and the differences in times to reach maximal concentration also did not reach statistical significance, studied tablets were considered bioequivalent.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T17:57:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dbe52dc762be43948e9de0119fa79e64
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0042-8450
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T17:57:26Z
publishDate 2006-01-01
publisher Military Health Department, Ministry of Defance, Serbia
record_format Article
series Vojnosanitetski Pregled
spelling doaj.art-dbe52dc762be43948e9de0119fa79e642022-12-22T02:36:25ZengMilitary Health Department, Ministry of Defance, SerbiaVojnosanitetski Pregled0042-84502006-01-0163121015102010.2298/VSP0612015JBioequivalence assessment of the two brands of glimepiride tabletsJovanović DušanStojšić DraganZlatković MilicaJović-Stošić JasminaJovanović MiodragBackground/Aim. Glimepiride, as an antidiabetic from the group of sulfonylurea, is administered perorally in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. The aim of this study was to compare pharmacokinetic profiles and relative bioavailabilities of the two oral formulations of glimepiride, generic and innovator tablets, after a single dose of the active drug. Methods. An oral dose of 6 mg glimepiride was given under fasting conditions to 24 healthy volunteers. A one-week washout period was applied between the two consecutive periods. The serum samples obtained before dosing, and at various time points up to 48 hours, were analyzed for glimepiride concentration using the validated highperformance liquid chromatographic method with ultraviolet detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters representing early (maximal concentration, time to reach maximal concentration) and total exposure (area under the curve from the time 0 to the infinite time) to glimepiride were obtained and further analyzed using the multifactorial analysis of variance and the non-parametric Wilcoxon signed ranks test. Comparison of the secondary kinetic variables was only descriptive. Results. The point estimates of the ratios of geometric means (test/reference) of maximal concentrations and areas under the curve were 1.046 (90% confidence interval: 0.906−1.208) and 1.022 (90% confidence interval: 0.856−1.220), respectively, while the median values of times to reach maximal concentration, at 5% level of significance, did not differ significantly. Both formulations were well tolerated. Transient mild hypoglycaemia, which had been noted in 6 participants, resolved spontaneously within 30−60 minutes. Conclusion. Since all the parametric 90% confidence intervals for the log-transformed main variables of glimepiride were within the 0.80 and 1.25 interval, accepted as the definition of bioequivalence, and the differences in times to reach maximal concentration also did not reach statistical significance, studied tablets were considered bioequivalent.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2006/0042-84500612015J.pdfdiabetes mellitus, type 2drugs, genericsulfonylurea compoundstherapeutic equivalencybiological availability
spellingShingle Jovanović Dušan
Stojšić Dragan
Zlatković Milica
Jović-Stošić Jasmina
Jovanović Miodrag
Bioequivalence assessment of the two brands of glimepiride tablets
Vojnosanitetski Pregled
diabetes mellitus, type 2
drugs, generic
sulfonylurea compounds
therapeutic equivalency
biological availability
title Bioequivalence assessment of the two brands of glimepiride tablets
title_full Bioequivalence assessment of the two brands of glimepiride tablets
title_fullStr Bioequivalence assessment of the two brands of glimepiride tablets
title_full_unstemmed Bioequivalence assessment of the two brands of glimepiride tablets
title_short Bioequivalence assessment of the two brands of glimepiride tablets
title_sort bioequivalence assessment of the two brands of glimepiride tablets
topic diabetes mellitus, type 2
drugs, generic
sulfonylurea compounds
therapeutic equivalency
biological availability
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2006/0042-84500612015J.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jovanovicdusan bioequivalenceassessmentofthetwobrandsofglimepiridetablets
AT stojsicdragan bioequivalenceassessmentofthetwobrandsofglimepiridetablets
AT zlatkovicmilica bioequivalenceassessmentofthetwobrandsofglimepiridetablets
AT jovicstosicjasmina bioequivalenceassessmentofthetwobrandsofglimepiridetablets
AT jovanovicmiodrag bioequivalenceassessmentofthetwobrandsofglimepiridetablets