Correlating Standard Penetration Test and Dynamic Probe Super Heavy penetration resistance values in sandy soils

This paper presents a statistical method used to develop an empirical equivalence between the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and the Dynamic Probe Super Heavy (DPSH) in sandy material. Penetration resistance values from the two tests are often taken as equivalent for design purposes, as the same dr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C MacRobert, D Kalumba, P Beales
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: South African Institution of Civil Engineering 2011-04-01
Series:Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineers
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1021-20192011000100006
_version_ 1797764211057623040
author C MacRobert
D Kalumba
P Beales
author_facet C MacRobert
D Kalumba
P Beales
author_sort C MacRobert
collection DOAJ
description This paper presents a statistical method used to develop an empirical equivalence between the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and the Dynamic Probe Super Heavy (DPSH) in sandy material. Penetration resistance values from the two tests are often taken as equivalent for design purposes, as the same drive energy is used in both. SPT and DPSH resistance values from different geological depositional and weathering environments were examined. The data came from the following areas across southern Africa: Matola in Mozambique, Gope in Botswana, Umdloti and Cape Town in South Africa, and Illha de Luanda in Angola. It was apparent that energy losses were greater in the DPSH test than in the SPT, leading to higher resistance values in the former. The SPT is carried out within a borehole, whereas the DPSH is continuously driven into the soil. The dynamic force applied to the DPSH rods causes soil to fill the small air annulus around the rods, exerting a frictional resistance. The different geological settings of the test sites revealed that, although different factors cause the friction, the equivalence varied in a similar manner. Hence a single correlation formula is suggested to determine equivalent SPT values from raw DPSH resistance values.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T19:52:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dbe58ade91784e589dc79eff6979fba0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1021-2019
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T19:52:25Z
publishDate 2011-04-01
publisher South African Institution of Civil Engineering
record_format Article
series Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineers
spelling doaj.art-dbe58ade91784e589dc79eff6979fba02023-08-02T03:05:24ZengSouth African Institution of Civil EngineeringJournal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineers1021-20192011-04-015314654Correlating Standard Penetration Test and Dynamic Probe Super Heavy penetration resistance values in sandy soilsC MacRobertD KalumbaP BealesThis paper presents a statistical method used to develop an empirical equivalence between the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and the Dynamic Probe Super Heavy (DPSH) in sandy material. Penetration resistance values from the two tests are often taken as equivalent for design purposes, as the same drive energy is used in both. SPT and DPSH resistance values from different geological depositional and weathering environments were examined. The data came from the following areas across southern Africa: Matola in Mozambique, Gope in Botswana, Umdloti and Cape Town in South Africa, and Illha de Luanda in Angola. It was apparent that energy losses were greater in the DPSH test than in the SPT, leading to higher resistance values in the former. The SPT is carried out within a borehole, whereas the DPSH is continuously driven into the soil. The dynamic force applied to the DPSH rods causes soil to fill the small air annulus around the rods, exerting a frictional resistance. The different geological settings of the test sites revealed that, although different factors cause the friction, the equivalence varied in a similar manner. Hence a single correlation formula is suggested to determine equivalent SPT values from raw DPSH resistance values.http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1021-20192011000100006Standard Penetration Test (SPT)Dynamic Probe Super Heavy (DPSH)Empirical EquivalenceGeotechnical Site InvestigationsDynamic Penetration Testing
spellingShingle C MacRobert
D Kalumba
P Beales
Correlating Standard Penetration Test and Dynamic Probe Super Heavy penetration resistance values in sandy soils
Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineers
Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
Dynamic Probe Super Heavy (DPSH)
Empirical Equivalence
Geotechnical Site Investigations
Dynamic Penetration Testing
title Correlating Standard Penetration Test and Dynamic Probe Super Heavy penetration resistance values in sandy soils
title_full Correlating Standard Penetration Test and Dynamic Probe Super Heavy penetration resistance values in sandy soils
title_fullStr Correlating Standard Penetration Test and Dynamic Probe Super Heavy penetration resistance values in sandy soils
title_full_unstemmed Correlating Standard Penetration Test and Dynamic Probe Super Heavy penetration resistance values in sandy soils
title_short Correlating Standard Penetration Test and Dynamic Probe Super Heavy penetration resistance values in sandy soils
title_sort correlating standard penetration test and dynamic probe super heavy penetration resistance values in sandy soils
topic Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
Dynamic Probe Super Heavy (DPSH)
Empirical Equivalence
Geotechnical Site Investigations
Dynamic Penetration Testing
url http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1021-20192011000100006
work_keys_str_mv AT cmacrobert correlatingstandardpenetrationtestanddynamicprobesuperheavypenetrationresistancevaluesinsandysoils
AT dkalumba correlatingstandardpenetrationtestanddynamicprobesuperheavypenetrationresistancevaluesinsandysoils
AT pbeales correlatingstandardpenetrationtestanddynamicprobesuperheavypenetrationresistancevaluesinsandysoils